Associations between tobacco 21 and state flavour restrictions with young adult tobacco use.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Summer Sherburne Hawkins, Naoka Carey, Rebekah Levine Coley, Christopher F Baum
{"title":"Associations between tobacco 21 and state flavour restrictions with young adult tobacco use.","authors":"Summer Sherburne Hawkins, Naoka Carey, Rebekah Levine Coley, Christopher F Baum","doi":"10.1136/tc-2023-058448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>States have recently enacted tobacco-related age and flavour restrictions in addition to federal T21 laws. Little is known about the independent effects of these policies on young adult tobacco use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Linking 2011-2022 Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System data on 2 696 870, 18-59 years from 50 states and DC with policy data, we conducted probit regression models to evaluate the associations between state and federal T21 laws and state flavour restrictions with cigarettes, electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) and smokeless tobacco use. Models were adjusted for sociodemographics, additional tobacco policies, COVID-19-related factors, year and state. We tested two-way and three-way interactions between age, state T21 and federal T21 laws.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although we did not find evidence that state T21 laws were associated with cigarette, smokeless tobacco or ENDS use overall, the federal T21 law was associated with lower use of all three tobacco products by 0.39-0.92 percentage points. State flavour restrictions were associated with lower use of cigarettes by 0.68 (-1.27 to -0.09) and ENDS by 0.56 (-1.11 to -0.00) percentage points, but not with smokeless tobacco. A three-way interaction revealed that state and federal T21 laws together were associated with a lower prevalence of ENDS use among 18-20 years, but there were no differences in cigarette use from both policies combined versus either alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>State and federal T21 laws are broadly effective at reducing adult tobacco use, while state flavour restrictions specifically lower use of cigarettes and ENDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":" ","pages":"571-578"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11693773/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2023-058448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: States have recently enacted tobacco-related age and flavour restrictions in addition to federal T21 laws. Little is known about the independent effects of these policies on young adult tobacco use.

Methods: Linking 2011-2022 Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System data on 2 696 870, 18-59 years from 50 states and DC with policy data, we conducted probit regression models to evaluate the associations between state and federal T21 laws and state flavour restrictions with cigarettes, electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) and smokeless tobacco use. Models were adjusted for sociodemographics, additional tobacco policies, COVID-19-related factors, year and state. We tested two-way and three-way interactions between age, state T21 and federal T21 laws.

Results: Although we did not find evidence that state T21 laws were associated with cigarette, smokeless tobacco or ENDS use overall, the federal T21 law was associated with lower use of all three tobacco products by 0.39-0.92 percentage points. State flavour restrictions were associated with lower use of cigarettes by 0.68 (-1.27 to -0.09) and ENDS by 0.56 (-1.11 to -0.00) percentage points, but not with smokeless tobacco. A three-way interaction revealed that state and federal T21 laws together were associated with a lower prevalence of ENDS use among 18-20 years, but there were no differences in cigarette use from both policies combined versus either alone.

Conclusion: State and federal T21 laws are broadly effective at reducing adult tobacco use, while state flavour restrictions specifically lower use of cigarettes and ENDS.

烟草 21 和州烟草口味限制与青少年烟草使用之间的关系。
背景:除联邦 T21 法案外,各州最近还颁布了与烟草有关的年龄和口味限制。人们对这些政策对年轻成人烟草使用的独立影响知之甚少:我们将 2011-2022 年行为危险因素监测系统中来自 50 个州和华盛顿特区的 2 696 870 名 18-59 岁青少年的数据与政策数据联系起来,建立了概率回归模型,以评估州和联邦 T21 法律及州口味限制与卷烟、电子尼古丁递送系统 (ENDS) 和无烟烟草使用之间的关联。模型根据社会人口统计学、其他烟草政策、COVID-19 相关因素、年份和州进行了调整。我们测试了年龄、州 T21 法律和联邦 T21 法律之间的双向和三向交互作用:尽管我们没有发现证据表明州 T21 法律与卷烟、无烟烟草或 ENDS 的总体使用率有关,但联邦 T21 法律与这三种烟草产品的使用率降低了 0.39-0.92 个百分点。各州的烟草口味限制与卷烟使用量降低 0.68 个百分点(-1.27 到 -0.09)和 ENDS 使用量降低 0.56 个百分点(-1.11 到 -0.00)有关,但与无烟烟草无关。三方交互作用显示,州和联邦 T21 法律的共同作用与 18-20 岁人群使用 ENDS 的流行率降低有关,但这两项政策的共同作用与单独作用在卷烟使用方面没有差异:结论:州和联邦 T21 法律在减少成人烟草使用方面具有广泛的效果,而州的风味限制措施则特别能降低香烟和 ENDS 的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信