Improving Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy With Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction in Patients With Suspected Focal Epilepsy.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Pae Sun Suh, Ji Eun Park, Yun Hwa Roh, Seonok Kim, Mina Jung, Yong Seo Koo, Sang-Ahm Lee, Yangsean Choi, Ho Sung Kim
{"title":"Improving Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy With Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction in Patients With Suspected Focal Epilepsy.","authors":"Pae Sun Suh, Ji Eun Park, Yun Hwa Roh, Seonok Kim, Mina Jung, Yong Seo Koo, Sang-Ahm Lee, Yangsean Choi, Ho Sung Kim","doi":"10.3348/kjr.2023.0842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic performance and image quality of 1.5-mm slice thickness MRI with deep learning-based image reconstruction (1.5-mm MRI + DLR) compared to routine 3-mm slice thickness MRI (routine MRI) and 1.5-mm slice thickness MRI without DLR (1.5-mm MRI without DLR) for evaluating temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 117 MR image sets comprising 1.5-mm MRI + DLR, 1.5-mm MRI without DLR, and routine MRI from 117 consecutive patients (mean age, 41 years; 61 female; 34 patients with TLE and 83 without TLE). Two neuroradiologists evaluated the presence of hippocampal or temporal lobe lesions, volume loss, signal abnormalities, loss of internal structure of the hippocampus, and lesion conspicuity in the temporal lobe. Reference standards for TLE were independently constructed by neurologists using clinical and radiological findings. Subjective image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were analyzed. Performance in diagnosing TLE, lesion findings, and image quality were compared among the three protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled sensitivity of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR (91.2%) for diagnosing TLE was higher than that of routine MRI (72.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, 1.5-mm MRI + DLR showed higher sensitivity for hippocampal lesions than routine MRI (92.7% vs. 75.0%, <i>P</i> = 0.001), with improved depiction of hippocampal T2 high signal intensity change (<i>P</i> = 0.016) and loss of internal structure (<i>P</i> < 0.001). However, the pooled specificity of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR (76.5%) was lower than that of routine MRI (89.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.004). Compared with 1.5-mm MRI without DLR, 1.5-mm MRI + DLR resulted in significantly improved pooled accuracy (91.2% vs. 73.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.010), image quality, SNR, and CNR (all, <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR enhanced the performance of MRI in diagnosing TLE, particularly in hippocampal evaluation, because of improved depiction of hippocampal abnormalities and enhanced image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":17881,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Radiology","volume":"25 4","pages":"374-383"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10973740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2023.0842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and image quality of 1.5-mm slice thickness MRI with deep learning-based image reconstruction (1.5-mm MRI + DLR) compared to routine 3-mm slice thickness MRI (routine MRI) and 1.5-mm slice thickness MRI without DLR (1.5-mm MRI without DLR) for evaluating temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 117 MR image sets comprising 1.5-mm MRI + DLR, 1.5-mm MRI without DLR, and routine MRI from 117 consecutive patients (mean age, 41 years; 61 female; 34 patients with TLE and 83 without TLE). Two neuroradiologists evaluated the presence of hippocampal or temporal lobe lesions, volume loss, signal abnormalities, loss of internal structure of the hippocampus, and lesion conspicuity in the temporal lobe. Reference standards for TLE were independently constructed by neurologists using clinical and radiological findings. Subjective image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were analyzed. Performance in diagnosing TLE, lesion findings, and image quality were compared among the three protocols.

Results: The pooled sensitivity of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR (91.2%) for diagnosing TLE was higher than that of routine MRI (72.1%, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, 1.5-mm MRI + DLR showed higher sensitivity for hippocampal lesions than routine MRI (92.7% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.001), with improved depiction of hippocampal T2 high signal intensity change (P = 0.016) and loss of internal structure (P < 0.001). However, the pooled specificity of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR (76.5%) was lower than that of routine MRI (89.2%, P = 0.004). Compared with 1.5-mm MRI without DLR, 1.5-mm MRI + DLR resulted in significantly improved pooled accuracy (91.2% vs. 73.1%, P = 0.010), image quality, SNR, and CNR (all, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The use of 1.5-mm MRI + DLR enhanced the performance of MRI in diagnosing TLE, particularly in hippocampal evaluation, because of improved depiction of hippocampal abnormalities and enhanced image quality.

用基于深度学习的图像重构提高疑似局灶性癫痫患者颞叶癫痫核磁共振成像的诊断性能
目的评估基于深度学习图像重建的 1.5 毫米切片厚度 MRI(1.5 毫米 MRI + DLR)与常规 3 毫米切片厚度 MRI(常规 MRI)和无 DLR 的 1.5 毫米切片厚度 MRI(无 DLR 的 1.5 毫米 MRI)在评估颞叶癫痫(TLE)方面的诊断性能和图像质量:这项回顾性研究纳入了 117 套 MR 图像,包括 1.5 毫米 MRI + DLR、1.5 毫米 MRI(无 DLR)和 117 名连续患者(平均年龄 41 岁;61 名女性;34 名 TLE 患者和 83 名非 TLE 患者)的常规 MRI。两位神经放射学专家评估了海马或颞叶病变的存在、体积损失、信号异常、海马内部结构损失以及颞叶病变的明显性。TLE的参考标准由神经学家根据临床和放射学检查结果独立制定。对主观图像质量、信噪比(SNR)和对比度与噪声比(CNR)进行了分析。比较了三种方案在诊断 TLE 方面的性能、病变结果和图像质量:1.5毫米MRI+DLR诊断TLE的综合灵敏度(91.2%)高于常规MRI(72.1%,P<0.001)。在亚组分析中,1.5毫米磁共振成像+DLR对海马病变的敏感性高于常规磁共振成像(92.7% vs. 75.0%,P = 0.001),对海马T2高信号强度变化(P = 0.016)和内部结构缺失(P < 0.001)的描述也有所改善。然而,1.5 毫米 MRI + DLR 的集合特异性(76.5%)低于常规 MRI(89.2%,P = 0.004)。与不使用 DLR 的 1.5 毫米 MRI 相比,1.5 毫米 MRI + DLR 在汇总准确性(91.2% 对 73.1%,P = 0.010)、图像质量、信噪比和 CNR(均为 P <0.001)方面均有显著改善:结论:使用1.5毫米核磁共振成像+DLR提高了核磁共振成像诊断TLE的性能,尤其是在海马体评估方面,因为对海马体异常的描述得到了改善,图像质量得到了提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Radiology
Korean Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
141
审稿时长
1.3 months
期刊介绍: The inaugural issue of the Korean J Radiol came out in March 2000. Our journal aims to produce and propagate knowledge on radiologic imaging and related sciences. A unique feature of the articles published in the Journal will be their reflection of global trends in radiology combined with an East-Asian perspective. Geographic differences in disease prevalence will be reflected in the contents of papers, and this will serve to enrich our body of knowledge. World''s outstanding radiologists from many countries are serving as editorial board of our journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信