Deep learning on pre-procedural computed tomography and clinical data predicts outcome following stroke thrombectomy.

IF 4.5 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
James P Diprose, William K Diprose, Tuan-Yow Chien, Michael T M Wang, Andrew McFetridge, Gregory P Tarr, Kaustubha Ghate, James Beharry, JaeBeom Hong, Teddy Wu, Doug Campbell, P Alan Barber
{"title":"Deep learning on pre-procedural computed tomography and clinical data predicts outcome following stroke thrombectomy.","authors":"James P Diprose, William K Diprose, Tuan-Yow Chien, Michael T M Wang, Andrew McFetridge, Gregory P Tarr, Kaustubha Ghate, James Beharry, JaeBeom Hong, Teddy Wu, Doug Campbell, P Alan Barber","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2023-021154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep learning using clinical and imaging data may improve pre-treatment prognostication in ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Deep learning models were trained and tested on baseline clinical and imaging (CT head and CT angiography) data to predict 3-month functional outcomes in stroke patients who underwent EVT. Classical machine learning models (logistic regression and random forest classifiers) were constructed to compare their performance with the deep learning models. An external validation dataset was used to validate the models. The MR PREDICTS prognostic tool was tested on the external validation set, and its performance was compared with the deep learning and classical machine learning models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 975 patients (550 men; mean±SD age 67.5±15.1 years) were studied with 778 patients in the model development cohort and 197 in the external validation cohort. The deep learning model trained on baseline CT and clinical data, and the logistic regression model (clinical data alone) demonstrated the strongest discriminative abilities for 3-month functional outcome and were comparable (AUC 0.811 vs 0.817, Q=0.82). Both models exhibited superior prognostic performance than the other deep learning (CT head alone, CT head, and CT angiography) and MR PREDICTS models (all Q<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The discriminative performance of deep learning for predicting functional independence was comparable to logistic regression. Future studies should focus on whether incorporating procedural and post-procedural data significantly improves model performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"266-271"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2023-021154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deep learning using clinical and imaging data may improve pre-treatment prognostication in ischemic stroke patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).

Methods: Deep learning models were trained and tested on baseline clinical and imaging (CT head and CT angiography) data to predict 3-month functional outcomes in stroke patients who underwent EVT. Classical machine learning models (logistic regression and random forest classifiers) were constructed to compare their performance with the deep learning models. An external validation dataset was used to validate the models. The MR PREDICTS prognostic tool was tested on the external validation set, and its performance was compared with the deep learning and classical machine learning models.

Results: A total of 975 patients (550 men; mean±SD age 67.5±15.1 years) were studied with 778 patients in the model development cohort and 197 in the external validation cohort. The deep learning model trained on baseline CT and clinical data, and the logistic regression model (clinical data alone) demonstrated the strongest discriminative abilities for 3-month functional outcome and were comparable (AUC 0.811 vs 0.817, Q=0.82). Both models exhibited superior prognostic performance than the other deep learning (CT head alone, CT head, and CT angiography) and MR PREDICTS models (all Q<0.05).

Conclusions: The discriminative performance of deep learning for predicting functional independence was comparable to logistic regression. Future studies should focus on whether incorporating procedural and post-procedural data significantly improves model performance.

对手术前计算机断层扫描和临床数据的深度学习可预测中风血栓切除术后的预后。
背景利用临床和成像数据进行深度学习可改善接受血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的缺血性中风患者的治疗前预后:根据基线临床和成像(头部 CT 和 CT 血管造影)数据对深度学习模型进行了训练和测试,以预测接受 EVT 的脑卒中患者 3 个月的功能预后。构建了经典机器学习模型(逻辑回归和随机森林分类器),以比较它们与深度学习模型的性能。外部验证数据集用于验证模型。在外部验证集上测试了MR PREDICTS预后工具,并将其性能与深度学习模型和经典机器学习模型进行了比较:共研究了 975 名患者(550 名男性;平均(±SD)年龄为 67.5±15.1 岁),其中 778 名患者属于模型开发队列,197 名患者属于外部验证队列。根据基线 CT 和临床数据训练的深度学习模型和逻辑回归模型(仅临床数据)对 3 个月功能预后的判别能力最强,两者不相上下(AUC 0.811 vs 0.817,Q=0.82)。与其他深度学习模型(仅头部 CT、头部 CT 和 CT 血管造影)和 MR PREDICTS 模型相比,这两个模型都表现出更优越的预后性能(所有 Q 值结论):深度学习在预测功能独立性方面的判别性能与逻辑回归相当。未来的研究应重点关注纳入程序数据和程序后数据是否能显著提高模型性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信