Characterization of Telerehabilitation Visits and Patient Satisfaction in Outpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics From March 2020 to November 2021.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Brittany Wright, Candice Osborne, Swapnika Alahari, Shannon B Juengst, Rupali Kumar, Jason Smith, Surendra Barshikar
{"title":"Characterization of Telerehabilitation Visits and Patient Satisfaction in Outpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics From March 2020 to November 2021.","authors":"Brittany Wright, Candice Osborne, Swapnika Alahari, Shannon B Juengst, Rupali Kumar, Jason Smith, Surendra Barshikar","doi":"10.1097/PHM.0000000000002500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study is to explore the usability of and satisfaction with telerehabilitation services provided to rehabilitation patients with various diagnoses at two large urban medical facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a usability study and all patients that received telerehabilitation services from March 2020 to November 2021 were included. Of the 4070 surveys sent via mail or email links to REDCap, 405 were completed (10% response rate). Participants completed demographic surveys, surveys on the telerehabilitation visit characteristics, telerehabilitation usability, and overall satisfaction with the visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were mostly women (64.4%), White, non-Hispanic (74.3%), and English-speaking (99%). Most patients were seen via telerehabilitation due to COVID-19 restrictions (37.1%). Patients were generally satisfied with their telerehabilitation visit (3.64 out of 4). Additionally, patients generally found telerehab to be useful (6.4 out of 7), easy to use (6.3 out of 7), effective (6.2 out of 7), satisfactory (6.3 out of 7), and comparable to in-person visits (6.5 out of 7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients generally reported feeling satisfied and comfortable with telerehabilitation visits and felt that they were comparable to in-person visits. Future research should examine the impact of socioeconomic factors on telerehabilitation use, with a focus on education level and non-English speakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7850,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1012-1016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000002500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study is to explore the usability of and satisfaction with telerehabilitation services provided to rehabilitation patients with various diagnoses at two large urban medical facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Design: This was a usability study and all patients that received telerehabilitation services from March 2020 to November 2021 were included. Of the 4070 surveys sent via mail or email links to REDCap, 405 were completed (10% response rate). Participants completed demographic surveys, surveys on the telerehabilitation visit characteristics, telerehabilitation usability, and overall satisfaction with the visit.

Results: Patients were mostly women (64.4%), White, non-Hispanic (74.3%), and English-speaking (99%). Most patients were seen via telerehabilitation due to COVID-19 restrictions (37.1%). Patients were generally satisfied with their telerehabilitation visit (3.64 out of 4). Additionally, patients generally found telerehab to be useful (6.4 out of 7), easy to use (6.3 out of 7), effective (6.2 out of 7), satisfactory (6.3 out of 7), and comparable to in-person visits (6.5 out of 7).

Conclusions: Patients generally reported feeling satisfied and comfortable with telerehabilitation visits and felt that they were comparable to in-person visits. Future research should examine the impact of socioeconomic factors on telerehabilitation use, with a focus on education level and non-English speakers.

2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 11 月期间,物理医学和康复门诊中远程康复就诊的特点和患者满意度。
目的探讨在Covid-19大流行期间,两家大型城市医疗机构为不同诊断的康复患者提供的远程康复服务的可用性和满意度:这是一项可用性研究,纳入了 2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 11 月期间接受远程康复服务的所有患者。在通过邮件或电子邮件链接向 RedCap 发送的 4070 份调查中,有 405 份完成(回复率为 10%)。参与者完成了人口统计学调查、远程康复访问特征调查、远程康复可用性调查以及访问总体满意度调查:患者大多为女性(64.4%)、非西班牙裔白人(74.3%)和讲英语者(99%)。由于 Covid-19 的限制,大多数患者通过远程康复就诊(37.1%)。患者普遍对远程康复就诊感到满意(3.64 分,满分为 4 分)。此外,患者普遍认为远程康复治疗有用(6.4 分,满分为 7 分)、易于使用(6.3 分,满分为 7 分)、有效(6.2 分,满分为 7 分)、令人满意(6.3 分,满分为 7 分),并且与面对面就诊的效果相当(6.5 分,满分为 7 分):结论:患者普遍对远程康复就诊感到满意和舒适,并认为远程康复就诊与面对面就诊效果相当。未来的研究应探讨社会经济因素对远程康复服务使用的影响,重点关注教育水平和非英语使用者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
423
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation focuses on the practice, research and educational aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Monthly issues keep physiatrists up-to-date on the optimal functional restoration of patients with disabilities, physical treatment of neuromuscular impairments, the development of new rehabilitative technologies, and the use of electrodiagnostic studies. The Journal publishes cutting-edge basic and clinical research, clinical case reports and in-depth topical reviews of interest to rehabilitation professionals. Topics include prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of musculoskeletal conditions, brain injury, spinal cord injury, cardiopulmonary disease, trauma, acute and chronic pain, amputation, prosthetics and orthotics, mobility, gait, and pediatrics as well as areas related to education and administration. Other important areas of interest include cancer rehabilitation, aging, and exercise. The Journal has recently published a series of articles on the topic of outcomes research. This well-established journal is the official scholarly publication of the Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信