Effects of Size Polydispersity and Dense Media on Quantitative Ultrasound Estimates

IF 3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Olivier Lombard;Emilie Franceschini
{"title":"Effects of Size Polydispersity and Dense Media on Quantitative Ultrasound Estimates","authors":"Olivier Lombard;Emilie Franceschini","doi":"10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3379293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques based on the backscatter coefficient (BSC) aim to characterize the scattering properties of biological tissues. A scattering model is fit to the measured BSC, and the fitted QUS parameters can provide local tissue microstructure, namely, scatterer size and acoustic concentration. However, these techniques may fail to provide a correct description of tissue microstructure when the medium is polydisperse and/or dense. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of scatterer size polydispersity in sparse or dense media on the QUS estimates. Four scattering models (i.e., the monodisperse and polydisperse sparse models, and the monodisperse and polydisperse concentrated models based on the structure factor) are compared to assess their accuracy and reliability in quantifying the QUS estimates. Simulations are conducted with different scatterer size distributions for sparse, moderately dense, and dense media (volume fractions of 1%, 20%, and 73%, respectively). The QUS parameters are estimated by using model-based inverse methods at different center frequencies between 8 and 50 MHz. Experimental data are also analyzed using colon adenocarcinoma HT29 cell pellet biophantoms to further validate the results obtained from simulations at the volume fraction of 73%. Our findings reveal that the choice of scattering model has a significant impact on the accuracy of QUS estimates. For sufficiently high frequencies and dense media, the polydisperse concentrated model outperforms the other models and enables more accurate quantification. Furthermore, our results contribute to advancing our understanding of the complexities associated with scatterer size polydispersity and dense media in spectral-based QUS techniques.","PeriodicalId":13322,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","volume":"71 5","pages":"572-583"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10479173/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques based on the backscatter coefficient (BSC) aim to characterize the scattering properties of biological tissues. A scattering model is fit to the measured BSC, and the fitted QUS parameters can provide local tissue microstructure, namely, scatterer size and acoustic concentration. However, these techniques may fail to provide a correct description of tissue microstructure when the medium is polydisperse and/or dense. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects of scatterer size polydispersity in sparse or dense media on the QUS estimates. Four scattering models (i.e., the monodisperse and polydisperse sparse models, and the monodisperse and polydisperse concentrated models based on the structure factor) are compared to assess their accuracy and reliability in quantifying the QUS estimates. Simulations are conducted with different scatterer size distributions for sparse, moderately dense, and dense media (volume fractions of 1%, 20%, and 73%, respectively). The QUS parameters are estimated by using model-based inverse methods at different center frequencies between 8 and 50 MHz. Experimental data are also analyzed using colon adenocarcinoma HT29 cell pellet biophantoms to further validate the results obtained from simulations at the volume fraction of 73%. Our findings reveal that the choice of scattering model has a significant impact on the accuracy of QUS estimates. For sufficiently high frequencies and dense media, the polydisperse concentrated model outperforms the other models and enables more accurate quantification. Furthermore, our results contribute to advancing our understanding of the complexities associated with scatterer size polydispersity and dense media in spectral-based QUS techniques.
尺寸多分散性和致密介质对定量超声估算的影响。
基于后向散射系数(BSC)的定量超声(QUS)技术旨在描述生物组织的散射特性。将散射模型与测得的 BSC 进行拟合,拟合的 QUS 参数可提供局部组织的微观结构,即散射体大小和声波浓度。然而,当介质多分散和/或致密时,这些技术可能无法正确描述组织的微观结构。本研究的目的是研究稀疏或致密介质中散射体大小多分散性对 QUS 估计值的影响。比较了四种散射模型(即单分散和多分散稀疏模型,以及基于结构因子的单分散和多分散集中模型),以评估它们在量化 QUS 估计值方面的准确性和可靠性。针对稀疏、中等密度和高密度介质(体积分数分别为 1%、20% 和 73%)的不同散射体尺寸分布进行了模拟。在 8 MHz 和 50 MHz 之间的不同中心频率下,使用基于模型的反演方法估算 QUS 参数。还使用结肠腺癌 HT29 细胞颗粒生物体分析了实验数据,以进一步验证体积分数为 73% 时的模拟结果。我们的研究结果表明,散射模型的选择对 QUS 估计的准确性有重大影响。对于足够高的频率和致密介质,多分散浓缩模型优于其他模型,并能实现更精确的量化。此外,我们的研究结果有助于加深我们对基于光谱的 QUS 技术中与散射体尺寸多分散性和致密介质相关的复杂性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
583
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control includes the theory, technology, materials, and applications relating to: (1) the generation, transmission, and detection of ultrasonic waves and related phenomena; (2) medical ultrasound, including hyperthermia, bioeffects, tissue characterization and imaging; (3) ferroelectric, piezoelectric, and piezomagnetic materials, including crystals, polycrystalline solids, films, polymers, and composites; (4) frequency control, timing and time distribution, including crystal oscillators and other means of classical frequency control, and atomic, molecular and laser frequency control standards. Areas of interest range from fundamental studies to the design and/or applications of devices and systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信