Reactive or Proactive? How Robots Should Explain Failures

Gregory LeMasurier, Alvika Gautam, Zhao Han, Jacob W. Crandall, H. Yanco
{"title":"Reactive or Proactive? How Robots Should Explain Failures","authors":"Gregory LeMasurier, Alvika Gautam, Zhao Han, Jacob W. Crandall, H. Yanco","doi":"10.1145/3610977.3634963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As robots tackle increasingly complex tasks, the need for explanations becomes essential for gaining trust and acceptance. Explain-able robotic systems should not only elucidate failures when they occur but also predict and preemptively explain potential issues. This paper compares explanations from Reactive Systems, which detect and explain failures after they occur, to Proactive Systems, which predict and explain issues in advance. Our study reveals that the Proactive System fosters higher perceived intelligence and trust and its explanations were rated more understandable and timely. Our findings aim to advance the design of effective robot explanation systems, allowing people to diagnose and provide assistance for problems that may prevent a robot from finishing its task.","PeriodicalId":517915,"journal":{"name":"IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction","volume":"71 7","pages":"413-422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE/ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3610977.3634963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As robots tackle increasingly complex tasks, the need for explanations becomes essential for gaining trust and acceptance. Explain-able robotic systems should not only elucidate failures when they occur but also predict and preemptively explain potential issues. This paper compares explanations from Reactive Systems, which detect and explain failures after they occur, to Proactive Systems, which predict and explain issues in advance. Our study reveals that the Proactive System fosters higher perceived intelligence and trust and its explanations were rated more understandable and timely. Our findings aim to advance the design of effective robot explanation systems, allowing people to diagnose and provide assistance for problems that may prevent a robot from finishing its task.
反应式还是主动式?机器人应如何解释故障
随着机器人处理的任务越来越复杂,要想获得信任和认可,就必须进行解释。可解释的机器人系统不仅要在故障发生时进行解释,还要预测并预先解释潜在的问题。本文比较了反应式系统和主动式系统的解释,前者在故障发生后检测并解释故障,后者则提前预测并解释问题。我们的研究表明,主动式系统能提高感知智能和信任度,其解释也更容易理解、更及时。我们的研究结果旨在推动有效的机器人解释系统的设计,使人们能够对可能妨碍机器人完成任务的问题进行诊断并提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信