Weaning from mechanical ventilation and assessment of extubation readiness

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Guilherme Sant'Anna , Wissam Shalish
{"title":"Weaning from mechanical ventilation and assessment of extubation readiness","authors":"Guilherme Sant'Anna ,&nbsp;Wissam Shalish","doi":"10.1016/j.semperi.2024.151890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tremendous advancements in neonatal respiratory care have contributed to the improved survival of extremely preterm infants (gestational age ≤ 28 weeks). While mechanical ventilation is often considered one of the most important breakthroughs in neonatology, it is also associated with numerous short and long-term complications. For those reasons, clinical research has focused on strategies to avoid or reduce exposure to mechanical ventilation. Nonetheless, in the extreme preterm population, 70–100% of infants born 22–28 weeks of gestation are exposed to mechanical ventilation, with nearly 50% being ventilated for ≥ 3 weeks. As contemporary practices have shifted towards selectively reserving mechanical ventilation for those patients, mechanical ventilation weaning and extubation remain a priority yet offer a heightened challenge for clinicians. In this review, we will summarize the evidence for different strategies to expedite weaning and assess extubation readiness in preterm infants, with a particular focus on extremely preterm infants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21761,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in perinatology","volume":"48 2","pages":"Article 151890"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146000524000168/pdfft?md5=f3cae911d16545ade9ed583690199578&pid=1-s2.0-S0146000524000168-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146000524000168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tremendous advancements in neonatal respiratory care have contributed to the improved survival of extremely preterm infants (gestational age ≤ 28 weeks). While mechanical ventilation is often considered one of the most important breakthroughs in neonatology, it is also associated with numerous short and long-term complications. For those reasons, clinical research has focused on strategies to avoid or reduce exposure to mechanical ventilation. Nonetheless, in the extreme preterm population, 70–100% of infants born 22–28 weeks of gestation are exposed to mechanical ventilation, with nearly 50% being ventilated for ≥ 3 weeks. As contemporary practices have shifted towards selectively reserving mechanical ventilation for those patients, mechanical ventilation weaning and extubation remain a priority yet offer a heightened challenge for clinicians. In this review, we will summarize the evidence for different strategies to expedite weaning and assess extubation readiness in preterm infants, with a particular focus on extremely preterm infants.

机械通气断奶和拔管准备评估
新生儿呼吸护理的巨大进步提高了极早产儿(胎龄小于 28 周)的存活率。虽然机械通气通常被认为是新生儿科最重要的突破之一,但它也与许多短期和长期并发症有关。因此,临床研究主要集中在避免或减少机械通气的策略上。然而,在极早产儿中,70%-100% 的妊娠 22-28 周出生的婴儿需要接受机械通气,其中近 50%的婴儿通气时间超过 3 周。随着当代医疗实践转向有选择性地为这些患者保留机械通气,机械通气的断奶和拔管仍然是一个优先事项,但也给临床医生带来了更大的挑战。在本综述中,我们将总结早产儿(尤其是极早产儿)加速断奶和评估拔管准备的不同策略的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in perinatology
Seminars in perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of each issue of Seminars in Perinatology is to provide authoritative and comprehensive reviews of a single topic of interest to professionals who care for the mother, the fetus, and the newborn. The journal''s readership includes perinatologists, obstetricians, pediatricians, epidemiologists, students in these fields, and others. Each issue offers a comprehensive review of an individual topic, with emphasis on new developments that will have a direct impact on their practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信