Relationship Between Coagulation and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Lihui Zhu , Shuo Liu , Da Wang , Miao Yu , Hui Cai
{"title":"Relationship Between Coagulation and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Lihui Zhu ,&nbsp;Shuo Liu ,&nbsp;Da Wang ,&nbsp;Miao Yu ,&nbsp;Hui Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.curtheres.2024.100741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The hypercoagulable state of cancer patients is associated with their high mortality rate. Coagulation indicators may have an important role in the prognosis of gastric cancer patients and deserve to be explored in various aspects.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the correlation between coagulation and prognosis of gastric cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science databases, and the Cochrane Library up to February 16, 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. The processed data we pooled using either a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model and finally described overall survival with a risk ratio (hazard ratio [HR]) and predicted the likelihood of different clinicopathological events with a dominance ratio (OR).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 64 studies were screened for inclusion in the data analysis. Performing a meta-analysis of three indicators we derived that the risk of <span>d</span>-dimer (D-D), fibrinogen (FIB), and platelets (PLTs) were: HR = 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59–2.15, <em>N</em> = 15), HR = 1.77 (95% CI: 1.57–1.99, <em>N</em> = 28), HR = 1.16 (95% CI: 1.12–1.21, <em>N</em> = 29). In addition to this, all three were associated with advanced clinicopathological stage (D-D: OR = 2.25, FIB: OR = 2.07, PLT: OR = 1.84), T stage (D-D: OR = 2.30, FIB: OR = 2.38, PLT: OR = 2.22) and lymph node metastasis (D-D: OR = 1.79, FIB: OR = 1.70, PLT: OR = 1.51).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Overall, the findings suggest that the three indicators, D-D, FIB, and PLT count, have significant predictive value for the prognosis of gastric cancer. They were associated with an advanced clinicopathological stage and a high risk of lymph node metastasis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10920,"journal":{"name":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 100741"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X24000110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The hypercoagulable state of cancer patients is associated with their high mortality rate. Coagulation indicators may have an important role in the prognosis of gastric cancer patients and deserve to be explored in various aspects.

Objective

We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the correlation between coagulation and prognosis of gastric cancer.

Methods

A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science databases, and the Cochrane Library up to February 16, 2024. Literature screening and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. The processed data we pooled using either a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model and finally described overall survival with a risk ratio (hazard ratio [HR]) and predicted the likelihood of different clinicopathological events with a dominance ratio (OR).

Results

A total of 64 studies were screened for inclusion in the data analysis. Performing a meta-analysis of three indicators we derived that the risk of d-dimer (D-D), fibrinogen (FIB), and platelets (PLTs) were: HR = 1.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59–2.15, N = 15), HR = 1.77 (95% CI: 1.57–1.99, N = 28), HR = 1.16 (95% CI: 1.12–1.21, N = 29). In addition to this, all three were associated with advanced clinicopathological stage (D-D: OR = 2.25, FIB: OR = 2.07, PLT: OR = 1.84), T stage (D-D: OR = 2.30, FIB: OR = 2.38, PLT: OR = 2.22) and lymph node metastasis (D-D: OR = 1.79, FIB: OR = 1.70, PLT: OR = 1.51).

Conclusion

Overall, the findings suggest that the three indicators, D-D, FIB, and PLT count, have significant predictive value for the prognosis of gastric cancer. They were associated with an advanced clinicopathological stage and a high risk of lymph node metastasis.
凝血与胃癌预后的关系:系统回顾与荟萃分析
背景癌症患者的高凝状态与其高死亡率有关。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,探讨凝血与胃癌预后之间的相关性。方法在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 数据库和 Cochrane 图书馆中进行了全面的系统检索,截至 2024 年 2 月 16 日。文献筛选和数据提取由两名独立审稿人完成。我们使用随机效应模型或固定效应模型对处理后的数据进行汇总,最后用风险比(危险比[HR])描述总生存率,并用优势比(OR)预测不同临床病理事件发生的可能性。通过对三项指标进行荟萃分析,我们得出二聚体(D-D)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)和血小板(PLTs)的风险分别为HR = 1.85(95% 置信区间[CI]:1.59-2.15,N = 15)、HR = 1.77(95% 置信区间:1.57-1.99,N = 28)、HR = 1.16(95% 置信区间:1.12-1.21,N = 29)。除此之外,三者均与临床病理分期晚期(D-D:OR = 2.25,FIB:OR = 2.07,PLT:OR = 1.84)、T 期(D-D:OR = 2.30,FIB:OR = 2.38,PLT:OR = 2.总之,研究结果表明,D-D、FIB 和 PLT 计数这三个指标对胃癌的预后具有显著的预测价值。它们与临床病理分期的晚期和淋巴结转移的高风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: We also encourage the submission of manuscripts presenting preclinical and very preliminary research that may stimulate further investigation of potentially relevant findings, as well as in-depth review articles on specific therapies or disease states, and applied health delivery or pharmacoeconomics. CTR encourages and supports the submission of manuscripts describing: • Interventions designed to understand or improve human health, disease treatment or disease prevention; • Studies that focus on problems that are uncommon in resource-rich countries; • Research that is "under-published" because of limited access to monetary resources such as English language support and Open Access fees (CTR offers deeply discounted English language editing); • Republication of articles previously published in non-English journals (eg, evidence-based guidelines) which could be useful if translated into English; • Preclinical and clinical product development studies that are not pursued for further investigation based upon early phase results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信