Environmental Impact Assessment of Composition Wall Materials Alternatives Ibny Baitak as a Case Study

Ahmed Ali
{"title":"Environmental Impact Assessment of Composition Wall Materials Alternatives Ibny Baitak as a Case Study","authors":"Ahmed Ali","doi":"10.21608/sej.2024.268056.1052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated six wall composition material substitutes employed in constructing Egypt's Ibny Baitak Project for their potential environmental impact. Clay brick (20 cm ), cement brick (20 cm ), and autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) (20 𝑐𝑚 ) blocks were the four materials evaluated. Each wall material is reinforced with (4 cm extruded polystyrene (XPS) insulation in the fourth, fifth, and sixth scenarios. The study used a life cycle assessment (LCA) technique to assess the environmental impact of these products from cradle to gate, including raw material extraction, processing, and transportation. The outcomes showed that the environmental effects of the four materials varied greatly regarding the three impact categories of potential global warming, non-renewable energy use, and respiratory pollution. Regarding the midpoint result, the AAC ranked second by 1.49 𝑝𝑡 , followed by the cement bricks by 2.25 pt , with the clay brick recording the lowest environmental effect. The environmental impacts in the three final scenarios increased by 1.24 pt , 1.86 𝑝𝑡 , and 2.55 𝑝𝑡 , and an incremental rate of 13% when the XPS was added to the three wall types. The 20 𝑐𝑚 cement brick recorded the highest value, 8.40K KG Co 2 e, and the 4 cm XPS + 20 𝑐𝑚 cement brick composition recorded the lowest value, 1.97K KG Co 2 e. When considering the endpoint results, the cement brick recorded the highest values by 8.40K 𝐾𝐺 𝐶𝑜 2 e, which show climate change has the most significant impacts. Regarding the resource's depletion impact, cement bricks recorded the highest values with 138.42K Mj primay . The study's findings provide important details regarding the environmental effects of composition wall materials. They can influence decisions made in the construction sector, favoring greener building practices. © 2024 Published by Faculty of Engineering – Sohag University. DOI: 10.21608/SEJ.2024.268056.1052","PeriodicalId":34550,"journal":{"name":"Sohag Engineering Journal","volume":"600 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sohag Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/sej.2024.268056.1052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated six wall composition material substitutes employed in constructing Egypt's Ibny Baitak Project for their potential environmental impact. Clay brick (20 cm ), cement brick (20 cm ), and autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) (20 𝑐𝑚 ) blocks were the four materials evaluated. Each wall material is reinforced with (4 cm extruded polystyrene (XPS) insulation in the fourth, fifth, and sixth scenarios. The study used a life cycle assessment (LCA) technique to assess the environmental impact of these products from cradle to gate, including raw material extraction, processing, and transportation. The outcomes showed that the environmental effects of the four materials varied greatly regarding the three impact categories of potential global warming, non-renewable energy use, and respiratory pollution. Regarding the midpoint result, the AAC ranked second by 1.49 𝑝𝑡 , followed by the cement bricks by 2.25 pt , with the clay brick recording the lowest environmental effect. The environmental impacts in the three final scenarios increased by 1.24 pt , 1.86 𝑝𝑡 , and 2.55 𝑝𝑡 , and an incremental rate of 13% when the XPS was added to the three wall types. The 20 𝑐𝑚 cement brick recorded the highest value, 8.40K KG Co 2 e, and the 4 cm XPS + 20 𝑐𝑚 cement brick composition recorded the lowest value, 1.97K KG Co 2 e. When considering the endpoint results, the cement brick recorded the highest values by 8.40K 𝐾𝐺 𝐶𝑜 2 e, which show climate change has the most significant impacts. Regarding the resource's depletion impact, cement bricks recorded the highest values with 138.42K Mj primay . The study's findings provide important details regarding the environmental effects of composition wall materials. They can influence decisions made in the construction sector, favoring greener building practices. © 2024 Published by Faculty of Engineering – Sohag University. DOI: 10.21608/SEJ.2024.268056.1052
复合墙体材料替代品的环境影响评估 Ibny Baitak 案例研究
本研究调查了埃及 Ibny Baitak 项目建设过程中使用的六种墙体组成材料替代品对环境的潜在影响。粘土砖(20 厘米)、水泥砖(20 厘米)和蒸压加气混凝土(AAC)(20 𝑐𝑚 )砌块是接受评估的四种材料。在第四、第五和第六种方案中,每种墙体材料都使用 4 厘米挤塑聚苯乙烯(XPS)保温材料进行加固。研究采用生命周期评估(LCA)技术来评估这些产品从摇篮到大门的环境影响,包括原材料提取、加工和运输。结果表明,四种材料对环境的影响在潜在全球变暖、不可再生能源使用和呼吸污染这三个影响类别上存在很大差异。在中点结果方面,AAC 以 1.49 𝑝𝑡 排名第二,水泥砖以 2.25 pt 紧随其后,粘土砖的环境影响最低。三种最终方案的环境影响分别增加了 1.24pt、1.86 𝑝𝑡 和 2.55 𝑝𝑡,三种墙体中加入挤塑聚苯乙烯后,环境影响增加了 13%。在考虑终点结果时,水泥砖记录了最高值 8.40K 𝐺 𝐶𝑜 2 e,这表明气候变化的影响最为显著。在资源损耗影响方面,水泥砖的损耗值最高,为 138.42K Mj primay。研究结果提供了有关组成墙体材料对环境影响的重要细节。它们可以影响建筑行业的决策,促进绿色建筑的实践。© 2024 索哈格大学工程学院出版。DOI: 10.21608/SEJ.2024.268056.1052
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信