Anomaly distribution acquisition method for probabilistic damage tolerance assessment of hole features

IF 5.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Guo Li , Huimin Zhou , Junbo Liu , Shuyang Xia , Shuiting Ding
{"title":"Anomaly distribution acquisition method for probabilistic damage tolerance assessment of hole features","authors":"Guo Li ,&nbsp;Huimin Zhou ,&nbsp;Junbo Liu ,&nbsp;Shuyang Xia ,&nbsp;Shuiting Ding","doi":"10.1016/j.jppr.2023.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Anomaly distribution is an essential input for the probabilistic damage tolerance assessment, which is required by the airworthiness certification criteria Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) 33.70. The default anomaly distribution of hole features has been established and published in airworthiness advisory circular 33.70-2 based on historical anomaly data collected from cracked or ruptured parts recorded in laboratory analysis reports of the special industries before 2005. However, for other industries, this default anomaly distribution fails to reflect the machining level of these industries. Besides, insufficient historical maintenance anomaly data makes the mathematical model of the default distribution inapplicable, and few models can deal with the production data. Therefore, this paper proposes a model for achieving the anomaly distribution of hole features induced by machine or maintenance process, including collecting anomaly data, deriving the exceedance number by the probability of detection (POD), conducting the curve fitting process, and calibrating and modifying the anomaly distribution. The anomaly distribution and the probability of failure (POF) are dependent on defect numbers as well as confidence levels. To recommend the number of collected data and the correction factor for the POFs with different sample numbers and confidence levels, the sensitivity analysis is conducted by quantifying the influence of the anomaly distributions of different anomaly numbers on the POFs. Results show that when the anomaly number is 25, the differences between the POFs are less than 32.9%, and a 1.329 correction factor <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>z</mi><mi>P</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> is supposed to modify the POF. When the anomaly number is larger than 50, a 1.2 correction factor <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>z</mi><mi>P</mi></msub></mrow></math></span> is supposed to obtain the most conservative risk value with a 95% confidence level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51341,"journal":{"name":"Propulsion and Power Research","volume":"13 4","pages":"Pages 503-522"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Propulsion and Power Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212540X24000026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anomaly distribution is an essential input for the probabilistic damage tolerance assessment, which is required by the airworthiness certification criteria Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) 33.70. The default anomaly distribution of hole features has been established and published in airworthiness advisory circular 33.70-2 based on historical anomaly data collected from cracked or ruptured parts recorded in laboratory analysis reports of the special industries before 2005. However, for other industries, this default anomaly distribution fails to reflect the machining level of these industries. Besides, insufficient historical maintenance anomaly data makes the mathematical model of the default distribution inapplicable, and few models can deal with the production data. Therefore, this paper proposes a model for achieving the anomaly distribution of hole features induced by machine or maintenance process, including collecting anomaly data, deriving the exceedance number by the probability of detection (POD), conducting the curve fitting process, and calibrating and modifying the anomaly distribution. The anomaly distribution and the probability of failure (POF) are dependent on defect numbers as well as confidence levels. To recommend the number of collected data and the correction factor for the POFs with different sample numbers and confidence levels, the sensitivity analysis is conducted by quantifying the influence of the anomaly distributions of different anomaly numbers on the POFs. Results show that when the anomaly number is 25, the differences between the POFs are less than 32.9%, and a 1.329 correction factor zP is supposed to modify the POF. When the anomaly number is larger than 50, a 1.2 correction factor zP is supposed to obtain the most conservative risk value with a 95% confidence level.
用于孔洞特征损伤容限概率评估的异常分布采集方法
根据美国联邦航空法规(FAR) 33.70的适航认证标准,异常分布是概率损伤容限评估的重要输入。根据2005年以前特殊行业实验室分析报告中记录的裂纹或破裂部件的历史异常数据,建立了孔洞特征的默认异常分布,并发布在适航通告33.70-2中。然而,对于其他行业,这种默认的异常分布并不能反映这些行业的加工水平。此外,由于历史维修异常数据不足,使得默认分布的数学模型不适用,很少有模型可以处理生产数据。因此,本文提出了一种实现机器或维修过程引起的孔特征异常分布的模型,包括收集异常数据,通过检测概率(POD)推导出异常数,进行曲线拟合,校正和修改异常分布。异常分布和故障概率(POF)依赖于缺陷数和置信度。通过量化不同异常数的异常分布对pof的影响,进行敏感性分析,为不同样本数和置信水平的pof推荐采集数据的数量和校正因子。结果表明,当异常数为25时,POF之间的差异小于32.9%,应采用1.329修正因子zP对POF进行修正。当异常数大于50时,假设修正系数zP为1.2,得到最保守的风险值,置信水平为95%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
5.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Propulsion and Power Research is a peer reviewed scientific journal in English established in 2012. The Journals publishes high quality original research articles and general reviews in fundamental research aspects of aeronautics/astronautics propulsion and power engineering, including, but not limited to, system, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, combustion, vibration and acoustics, solid mechanics and dynamics, control and so on. The journal serves as a platform for academic exchange by experts, scholars and researchers in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信