Individual stigma in people with severe mental illness: Associations with public stigma, psychological capital, cognitive appraisal and coping orientations

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Xiuxiu Shi , Xuhai Sun , Chong Zhang , Zheng Li
{"title":"Individual stigma in people with severe mental illness: Associations with public stigma, psychological capital, cognitive appraisal and coping orientations","authors":"Xiuxiu Shi ,&nbsp;Xuhai Sun ,&nbsp;Chong Zhang ,&nbsp;Zheng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The reason why some people with severe mental illness (SMI) maintain positive self-identity, while some are affected by the stigmatized environment is unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To describe the status of individual stigma and explore the relationship between self-stigma, stigma resistance and related variables in people with SMI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2021 to March 2022. The Chinese version of Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale and Stigma Resistance Scale were used to assess individual stigma. Perceived public stigma, psychological capital, stigma stress appraisal and coping orientations were also measured by scales. Data was provided by 422 patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, from one psychiatric hospital and four community healthcare centers in China. A structural equation model was applied for analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The total mean scores of self-stigma and stigma resistance were (2.06 ± 0.65), and (3.95 ± 0.84). Perceived public stigma was the primary condition for constructing individual stigma, which indirectly affected self-stigma (<em>β</em> = 0.268) and stigma resistance (<em>β</em> = −0.145). Stigma stress appraisal mediated the transformation of public stigma into individual, which had direct and indirect effects on self-stigma (<em>β</em> = 0.417, 0.166), and an indirect effect on stigma resistance (<em>β</em> = −0.374). Secrecy positively affected self-stigma (<em>β</em> = 0.117), while positive coping positively affected stigma resistance (<em>β</em> = 0.380). Psychological capital significantly directly impacted individual stigma.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings highlighted how public stigma determines the degree to which patients with SMI deal with stigma stress appraisal, and how this influences individuals. Anti-stigma programs and interventions to improve individuals' psychological capital and coping capabilities should be emphasized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10554,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive psychiatry","volume":"132 ","pages":"Article 152474"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000257/pdfft?md5=1c827808363d6e4a1afe13e69d501ea6&pid=1-s2.0-S0010440X24000257-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X24000257","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The reason why some people with severe mental illness (SMI) maintain positive self-identity, while some are affected by the stigmatized environment is unclear.

Aims

To describe the status of individual stigma and explore the relationship between self-stigma, stigma resistance and related variables in people with SMI.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2021 to March 2022. The Chinese version of Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale and Stigma Resistance Scale were used to assess individual stigma. Perceived public stigma, psychological capital, stigma stress appraisal and coping orientations were also measured by scales. Data was provided by 422 patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, from one psychiatric hospital and four community healthcare centers in China. A structural equation model was applied for analysis.

Results

The total mean scores of self-stigma and stigma resistance were (2.06 ± 0.65), and (3.95 ± 0.84). Perceived public stigma was the primary condition for constructing individual stigma, which indirectly affected self-stigma (β = 0.268) and stigma resistance (β = −0.145). Stigma stress appraisal mediated the transformation of public stigma into individual, which had direct and indirect effects on self-stigma (β = 0.417, 0.166), and an indirect effect on stigma resistance (β = −0.374). Secrecy positively affected self-stigma (β = 0.117), while positive coping positively affected stigma resistance (β = 0.380). Psychological capital significantly directly impacted individual stigma.

Conclusions

Findings highlighted how public stigma determines the degree to which patients with SMI deal with stigma stress appraisal, and how this influences individuals. Anti-stigma programs and interventions to improve individuals' psychological capital and coping capabilities should be emphasized.

严重精神病患者的个人耻辱感:与公众羞辱、心理资本、认知评估和应对取向的关系
目的描述严重精神疾病患者的个人污名化状况,并探讨严重精神疾病患者的自我污名化、污名抵抗及相关变量之间的关系。采用中文版精神疾病内部化成见量表和成见抵抗量表评估个人成见。此外,还采用量表对感知到的公众污名、心理资本、污名压力评估和应对取向进行了测量。数据由来自中国一家精神病医院和四家社区医疗中心的 422 名精神分裂症或躁郁症患者提供。结果 自我成见和成见抵抗的总平均分为(2.06±0.65)分和(3.95±0.84)分。感知到的公众污名是构建个人污名的首要条件,它间接影响了自我污名(β = 0.268)和污名抵抗(β = -0.145)。成见压力评估介导了公众成见向个体成见的转化,对自我成见有直接和间接影响(β = 0.417,0.166),对成见抵制有间接影响(β = -0.374)。隐秘性对自我成见有正向影响(β = 0.117),而积极应对对成见抵制有正向影响(β = 0.380)。结论研究结果凸显了公众成见如何决定 SMI 患者应对成见压力评估的程度,以及这对个人的影响。应重视反污名化计划和干预措施,以提高个人的心理资本和应对能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comprehensive psychiatry
Comprehensive psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: "Comprehensive Psychiatry" is an open access, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the field of psychiatry and mental health. Its primary mission is to share the latest advancements in knowledge to enhance patient care and deepen the understanding of mental illnesses. The journal is supported by a diverse team of international editors and peer reviewers, ensuring the publication of high-quality research with a strong focus on clinical relevance and the implications for psychopathology. "Comprehensive Psychiatry" encourages authors to present their research in an accessible manner, facilitating engagement with clinicians, policymakers, and the broader public. By embracing an open access policy, the journal aims to maximize the global impact of its content, making it readily available to a wide audience and fostering scientific collaboration and public awareness beyond the traditional academic community. This approach is designed to promote a more inclusive and informed dialogue on mental health, contributing to the overall progress in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信