{"title":"Determinants for non-attendance in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening","authors":"Saira Mauland Mansoor MD , Jørgen Joakim Jørgensen MD , Tonje Grønvold MSc , Jonny Hisdal MSc, PhD , Toril Rabben MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Benefits of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening are dependent on high attendance. We sought to examine self-reported reasons for non-attendance and to describe differences in socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and risk factors between non-attenders and attenders.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All non-attenders to screening at Oslo University Hospital in 2022 were contacted by letter/phone with a questionnaire about reasons for non-attendance, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and risk factors. For all the attenders in 2022, information on comorbidities and risk factors was available in the screening database, and a randomized selection (1:1 to non-attenders) was contacted by phone to obtain information on socioeconomic factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 259 non-attenders and 1483 attenders to screening in 2022. Data on comorbidities and risk factors were available for all attenders. For the 259 men contacted in each group, the response rate was 39% for the non-attenders and 72% for the attenders. Among non-attenders who replied, 57% did not remember receiving an invitation or forgot the appointment; however, 76% replied that they would attend AAA screening if they were to receive a second invitation. Compared with attenders, non-attenders were more likely to live alone (41% vs 22%; <em>P</em> = .001), receive home nursing (10% vs 0.5%; <em>P</em> < .001), and to smoke (27% vs 14%; <em>P</em> < .001), and they were less likely to have a higher education (54% vs 71%; <em>P</em> = .004).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Contacting non-attenders yielded a reply from only 39%; thus, reasons for non-attendance are still obscured among the majority. Among those who replied, the main reasons for non-attendance were not remembering receiving an invitation or forgetting the appointment—modifiable factors that could be accounted for in the invitation process. There were significantly more smokers (the strongest modifiable AAA risk factor) among non-attenders, indicating that non-attenders would especially benefit from AAA screening.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100070"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000187/pdfft?md5=6d691c6e773a268772aeb34319e4cf32&pid=1-s2.0-S2949912724000187-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949912724000187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Benefits of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening are dependent on high attendance. We sought to examine self-reported reasons for non-attendance and to describe differences in socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and risk factors between non-attenders and attenders.
Methods
All non-attenders to screening at Oslo University Hospital in 2022 were contacted by letter/phone with a questionnaire about reasons for non-attendance, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, and risk factors. For all the attenders in 2022, information on comorbidities and risk factors was available in the screening database, and a randomized selection (1:1 to non-attenders) was contacted by phone to obtain information on socioeconomic factors.
Results
There were 259 non-attenders and 1483 attenders to screening in 2022. Data on comorbidities and risk factors were available for all attenders. For the 259 men contacted in each group, the response rate was 39% for the non-attenders and 72% for the attenders. Among non-attenders who replied, 57% did not remember receiving an invitation or forgot the appointment; however, 76% replied that they would attend AAA screening if they were to receive a second invitation. Compared with attenders, non-attenders were more likely to live alone (41% vs 22%; P = .001), receive home nursing (10% vs 0.5%; P < .001), and to smoke (27% vs 14%; P < .001), and they were less likely to have a higher education (54% vs 71%; P = .004).
Conclusions
Contacting non-attenders yielded a reply from only 39%; thus, reasons for non-attendance are still obscured among the majority. Among those who replied, the main reasons for non-attendance were not remembering receiving an invitation or forgetting the appointment—modifiable factors that could be accounted for in the invitation process. There were significantly more smokers (the strongest modifiable AAA risk factor) among non-attenders, indicating that non-attenders would especially benefit from AAA screening.
目的腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查的益处取决于高就诊率。我们试图研究自我报告的未参加筛查的原因,并描述未参加筛查者与参加筛查者在社会经济因素、合并症和风险因素方面的差异。方法通过信件/电话联系 2022 年在奥斯陆大学医院参加筛查的所有未参加者,向其发放有关未参加筛查的原因、社会经济因素、合并症和风险因素的调查问卷。对于2022年参加筛查的所有人员,筛查数据库中都有关于合并症和风险因素的信息,并通过电话随机选择(与未参加筛查人员的比例为1:1)人员进行联系,以获得关于社会经济因素的信息。所有参加筛查者都有合并症和风险因素的数据。在每组联系的 259 名男性中,未参加筛查者的回复率为 39%,参加筛查者的回复率为 72%。在回复的未参加者中,有 57% 的人不记得收到过邀请或忘记了预约时间;但有 76% 的人回复说,如果再次收到邀请,他们会参加 AAA 筛查。与参加者相比,未参加者更有可能独居(41% vs 22%; P = .001)、接受家庭护理(10% vs 0.5%; P <.001)和吸烟(27% vs 14%; P <.001),而且他们不太可能受过高等教育(54% vs 71%; P = .004)。在回复者中,未出席的主要原因是不记得收到过邀请或忘记了预约时间--这些都是在邀请过程中可以考虑的可改变因素。未参加筛查者中吸烟者(可改变 AAA 风险最大的因素)明显较多,这表明未参加筛查者将特别受益于 AAA 筛查。