Results of selective decontamination with oral neomycin and metronidazole for major colorectal surgery in Australia: A cohort study

Q3 Medicine
James Wei Tatt Toh , Devansh Shah , Henry Wang , Charlotte Kwik , Joseph Do Woong Choi , Chelsie Leonie Beinke , Paul Morris , Eleni Baird-Gunning , Geoffrey Peter Collins , Fiona Gavegan , Karen Shedden , Toufic El-Khoury , Nimalan Pathma-Nathan , Kerry Hitos
{"title":"Results of selective decontamination with oral neomycin and metronidazole for major colorectal surgery in Australia: A cohort study","authors":"James Wei Tatt Toh ,&nbsp;Devansh Shah ,&nbsp;Henry Wang ,&nbsp;Charlotte Kwik ,&nbsp;Joseph Do Woong Choi ,&nbsp;Chelsie Leonie Beinke ,&nbsp;Paul Morris ,&nbsp;Eleni Baird-Gunning ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Peter Collins ,&nbsp;Fiona Gavegan ,&nbsp;Karen Shedden ,&nbsp;Toufic El-Khoury ,&nbsp;Nimalan Pathma-Nathan ,&nbsp;Kerry Hitos","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The role of selective decontamination with oral antibiotics (OABs) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) prior to elective colorectal surgery is still widely debated. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of selective decontamination with neomycin, metronidazole and MBP compared to those of decontamination with MBP alone or with no preparation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Selective decontamination with neomycin and metronidazole combined with bowel preparation was introduced prior to elective colorectal surgery as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery program at Westmead Hospital, a major Australian tertiary referral hospital, between June 2017 and January 2023. Comparisons between short-term outcomes of OAB + MBP and MBP/no preparation were made using prospectively collected data on length of stay (LOS), readmission, mortality within 30 days, anastomotic leakage (AL), surgical site infection (SSI), urinary tract infection, deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and ileus. Follow-up was limited to hospital stays and subsequent presentations within the health district within thirty days of surgery. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyse continuous data, and the chi-square test was used for categorical data. Univariate and multivariate regression modelling was performed to identify risk factors associated with an increased likelihood of SSI and AL.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with oral neomycin and metronidazole combined with bowel preparation had reduced superficial SSI (2.7% vs. 7.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.043) and overall complications (32.7% vs. 44.6%, <em>p</em> = 0.020), particularly Clavien–Dindo 1 complications (7.3% vs. 16.5%, <em>p</em> = 0.009). However, the differences in AL (2.7% vs. 4.5%, <em>p</em> = 0.369) and organ/space SSI (1.3% vs. 3.7%, <em>p</em> = 0.327) were not statistically significant. The median LOS (6 d vs. 6 d, <em>p</em> = 0.370) was not different between the groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Selective decontamination with neomycin and metronidazole reduces the risk of SSIs and overall complications. There was a trend to toward a lower AL, but this difference was not statistically significant.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000215/pdfft?md5=b8de5e3010c70e4193b935e8ec2cb78a&pid=1-s2.0-S2468900924000215-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900924000215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The role of selective decontamination with oral antibiotics (OABs) and mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) prior to elective colorectal surgery is still widely debated. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of selective decontamination with neomycin, metronidazole and MBP compared to those of decontamination with MBP alone or with no preparation.

Methods

Selective decontamination with neomycin and metronidazole combined with bowel preparation was introduced prior to elective colorectal surgery as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery program at Westmead Hospital, a major Australian tertiary referral hospital, between June 2017 and January 2023. Comparisons between short-term outcomes of OAB + MBP and MBP/no preparation were made using prospectively collected data on length of stay (LOS), readmission, mortality within 30 days, anastomotic leakage (AL), surgical site infection (SSI), urinary tract infection, deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, and ileus. Follow-up was limited to hospital stays and subsequent presentations within the health district within thirty days of surgery. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyse continuous data, and the chi-square test was used for categorical data. Univariate and multivariate regression modelling was performed to identify risk factors associated with an increased likelihood of SSI and AL.

Results

Patients with oral neomycin and metronidazole combined with bowel preparation had reduced superficial SSI (2.7% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.043) and overall complications (32.7% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.020), particularly Clavien–Dindo 1 complications (7.3% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.009). However, the differences in AL (2.7% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.369) and organ/space SSI (1.3% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.327) were not statistically significant. The median LOS (6 d vs. 6 d, p = 0.370) was not different between the groups.

Conclusion

Selective decontamination with neomycin and metronidazole reduces the risk of SSIs and overall complications. There was a trend to toward a lower AL, but this difference was not statistically significant.

澳大利亚大肠手术中使用口服新霉素和甲硝唑进行选择性净化的结果:一项队列研究
目的在择期结直肠手术前使用口服抗生素(OABs)和机械肠道准备(MBP)进行选择性净化的作用仍存在广泛争议。本研究的目的是比较使用新霉素、甲硝唑和机械肠道准备进行选择性去污与仅使用机械肠道准备或不进行准备进行去污的结果。方法2017 年 6 月至 2023 年 1 月期间,澳大利亚一家大型三级转诊医院韦斯特米德医院在择期结直肠手术前引入了新霉素和甲硝唑联合肠道准备的选择性去污,作为术后增强恢复计划的一部分。通过前瞻性收集的住院时间(LOS)、再入院率、30 天内死亡率、吻合口漏(AL)、手术部位感染(SSI)、尿路感染、深静脉血栓和/或肺栓塞、肺炎和回肠瘘等数据,对 OAB + MBP 和 MBP/无准备的短期疗效进行了比较。随访仅限于手术后三十天内的住院情况和随后在卫生区内的就诊情况。连续数据采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验,分类数据采用卡方检验。结果患者在口服新霉素和甲硝唑并进行肠道准备后,表皮SSI(2.7% vs. 7.6%,p = 0.043)和总体并发症(32.7% vs. 44.6%,p = 0.020)均有所减少,尤其是Clavien-Dindo 1并发症(7.3% vs. 16.5%,p = 0.009)。然而,AL(2.7% 对 4.5%,p = 0.369)和器官/空间 SSI(1.3% 对 3.7%,p = 0.327)的差异无统计学意义。结论使用新霉素和甲硝唑进行选择性净化可降低 SSI 和总体并发症的风险。AL值有降低的趋势,但差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信