Real-world data on treatment patterns in at least high cardiovascular risk patients on dual and triple lipid lowering therapy in a Hellenic nationwide e-prescription database

IF 1.9 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios , Ioanna Dima , Panorios Benardos , Panagiota Mitrou , Konstantinos Mathioudakis , Anastasios Tsolakidis , Fotios Barkas , Konstantinos Tsioufis , Petros P. Sfikakis , Evangelos Liberopoulos , Charalambos Vlachopoulos
{"title":"Real-world data on treatment patterns in at least high cardiovascular risk patients on dual and triple lipid lowering therapy in a Hellenic nationwide e-prescription database","authors":"Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios ,&nbsp;Ioanna Dima ,&nbsp;Panorios Benardos ,&nbsp;Panagiota Mitrou ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Mathioudakis ,&nbsp;Anastasios Tsolakidis ,&nbsp;Fotios Barkas ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Tsioufis ,&nbsp;Petros P. Sfikakis ,&nbsp;Evangelos Liberopoulos ,&nbsp;Charalambos Vlachopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcrp.2024.200261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Despite recent guidelines appropriate lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) remains suboptimal in everyday clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>We aimed to describe clinical practice of use of LLT for at least high CV risk populations in a Hellenic real-world setting and assess how this relates to the European Society of Cardiology treatment guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from a retrospective cohort study of the National Registry of patients with dyslipidemia between 1/7/2017 and 30/6/2019 who were at least of high CV risk and filled a dual or triple lipid-lowering treatment (dLLT, tLLT) prescription. The primary outcomes of interest of this analysis were to report on the patterns of LLT use in at least high CV risk patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 994,255 (45.4% of Greeks on LLT) were of at least high CV risk and 120,490 (5.5%) were on dLLT or tLLT. The percentage of patients with reported statin intolerance ranged from 2 to 10%. While persistence was reported to be satisfactory (&gt;85% for both dLLT or tLLT), adherence was low (ranging between 14 and 34% for dLLT). In 6-month intervals, the percentage of patients achieving a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target below 100 md/dL ranged from 20% to 23% for dLLT and 34%–37% for tLLT.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The prevalence of at least high CV risk patients among patients receiving LLT in Greece is substantial. Despite the high persistence and probably due to the low adherence to treatment, LDL-C remains above targets in more than two thirds of patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29726,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 200261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000266/pdfft?md5=a58c177db33e8331dea93700cfbefbe7&pid=1-s2.0-S2772487524000266-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiology Cardiovascular Risk and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772487524000266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite recent guidelines appropriate lipid-lowering treatment (LLT) remains suboptimal in everyday clinical practice.

Aims

We aimed to describe clinical practice of use of LLT for at least high CV risk populations in a Hellenic real-world setting and assess how this relates to the European Society of Cardiology treatment guidelines.

Methods

We analyzed data from a retrospective cohort study of the National Registry of patients with dyslipidemia between 1/7/2017 and 30/6/2019 who were at least of high CV risk and filled a dual or triple lipid-lowering treatment (dLLT, tLLT) prescription. The primary outcomes of interest of this analysis were to report on the patterns of LLT use in at least high CV risk patients.

Results

A total of 994,255 (45.4% of Greeks on LLT) were of at least high CV risk and 120,490 (5.5%) were on dLLT or tLLT. The percentage of patients with reported statin intolerance ranged from 2 to 10%. While persistence was reported to be satisfactory (>85% for both dLLT or tLLT), adherence was low (ranging between 14 and 34% for dLLT). In 6-month intervals, the percentage of patients achieving a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target below 100 md/dL ranged from 20% to 23% for dLLT and 34%–37% for tLLT.

Conclusions

The prevalence of at least high CV risk patients among patients receiving LLT in Greece is substantial. Despite the high persistence and probably due to the low adherence to treatment, LDL-C remains above targets in more than two thirds of patients.

希腊全国电子处方数据库中有关接受双重和三重降脂疗法的至少心血管高危患者治疗模式的真实数据
背景尽管最近出台了相关指南,但在日常临床实践中,适当的降脂治疗(LLT)仍未达到最佳效果。目的我们旨在描述希腊真实世界中至少高 CV 风险人群使用 LLT 的临床实践,并评估这与欧洲心脏病学会治疗指南之间的关系。方法我们分析了2017年7月1日至2019年6月30日期间国家登记处的一项回顾性队列研究的数据,该研究的对象是至少具有高 CV 风险并开具了双重或三重降脂治疗(dLLT、tLLT)处方的血脂异常患者。结果共有 994,255 人(占服用 LLT 的希腊人的 45.4%)至少具有高 CV 风险,120,490 人(5.5%)服用了 dLLT 或 tLLT。据报告,他汀类药物不耐受的患者比例从 2% 到 10% 不等。据报告,患者的坚持率令人满意(dLLT 或 tLLT 均为 85%),但坚持率较低(dLLT 为 14% 至 34%)。在 6 个月的间隔期内,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)目标值低于 100 md/dL 的患者比例,dLLT 为 20% 至 23%,tLLT 为 34% 至 37%。尽管持续率很高,但可能由于治疗依从性较低,三分之二以上的患者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇仍高于目标值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
72 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信