Mahima T. Kumara , Rebecca J. Cleveland , Aleksandra M. Kostic , Serena E. Weisner , Kelli D. Allen , Yvonne M. Golightly , Heather Welch , Melissa Dale , Stephen P. Messier , David J. Hunter , Jeffrey N. Katz , Leigh F. Callahan , Elena Losina
{"title":"Budget impact of the Walk With Ease program for knee osteoarthritis","authors":"Mahima T. Kumara , Rebecca J. Cleveland , Aleksandra M. Kostic , Serena E. Weisner , Kelli D. Allen , Yvonne M. Golightly , Heather Welch , Melissa Dale , Stephen P. Messier , David J. Hunter , Jeffrey N. Katz , Leigh F. Callahan , Elena Losina","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Walk With Ease (WWE) is an effective low-cost walking program. We estimated the budget impact of implementing WWE in persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA) as a measure of affordability that can inform payers’ funding decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We estimated changes in two-year healthcare costs with and without WWE. We used the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) Model to estimate per-person medical expenditures. We estimated total and per-member-per-month (PMPM) costs of funding WWE for a hypothetical insurance plan with 75,000 members under two conditions: 1) all individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible for WWE, and 2) inactive and insufficiently active individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible. In sensitivity analyses, we varied WWE cost and efficacy and considered productivity costs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>With eligibility unrestricted by activity level, implementing WWE results in an additional $1,002,408 to the insurance plan over two years ($0.56 PMPM). With eligibility restricted to inactive and insufficiently active individuals, funding WWE results in an additional $571,931 over two years ($0.32 PMPM). In sensitivity analyses, when per-person costs of $10 to $1000 were added with 10–50% decreases in failure rate (enhanced sustainability of WWE benefits), two-year budget impact varied from $242,684 to $6,985,674 with unrestricted eligibility and from -$43,194 (cost-saving) to $4,484,122 with restricted eligibility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Along with the cost-effectiveness of WWE at widely accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds, these results can inform payers in deciding to fund WWE. In the absence of accepted thresholds to define affordability, these results can assist in comparing the affordability of WWE with other behavioral interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100463"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591312400030X/pdfft?md5=fcf17763a67bc8c5ac2c88dd2b7749b9&pid=1-s2.0-S266591312400030X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266591312400030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Walk With Ease (WWE) is an effective low-cost walking program. We estimated the budget impact of implementing WWE in persons with knee osteoarthritis (OA) as a measure of affordability that can inform payers’ funding decisions.
Methods
We estimated changes in two-year healthcare costs with and without WWE. We used the Osteoarthritis Policy (OAPol) Model to estimate per-person medical expenditures. We estimated total and per-member-per-month (PMPM) costs of funding WWE for a hypothetical insurance plan with 75,000 members under two conditions: 1) all individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible for WWE, and 2) inactive and insufficiently active individuals aged 45+ with knee OA eligible. In sensitivity analyses, we varied WWE cost and efficacy and considered productivity costs.
Results
With eligibility unrestricted by activity level, implementing WWE results in an additional $1,002,408 to the insurance plan over two years ($0.56 PMPM). With eligibility restricted to inactive and insufficiently active individuals, funding WWE results in an additional $571,931 over two years ($0.32 PMPM). In sensitivity analyses, when per-person costs of $10 to $1000 were added with 10–50% decreases in failure rate (enhanced sustainability of WWE benefits), two-year budget impact varied from $242,684 to $6,985,674 with unrestricted eligibility and from -$43,194 (cost-saving) to $4,484,122 with restricted eligibility.
Conclusion
Along with the cost-effectiveness of WWE at widely accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds, these results can inform payers in deciding to fund WWE. In the absence of accepted thresholds to define affordability, these results can assist in comparing the affordability of WWE with other behavioral interventions.
目的 "轻松行走"(WWE)是一项有效的低成本行走计划。我们估算了在膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)患者中实施 WWE 对预算的影响,以此衡量支付者的经济承受能力,为他们的资助决策提供参考。我们使用骨关节炎政策(OAPol)模型来估算人均医疗支出。我们估算了一个拥有 75,000 名成员的假定保险计划在两种情况下为 WWE 提供资金的总成本和每名成员每月的成本(PMPM):1)所有年龄在 45 岁以上的膝关节 OA 患者均符合 WWE 条件;2)年龄在 45 岁以上的膝关节 OA 非活动和非充分活动患者符合条件。在敏感性分析中,我们改变了 WWE 的成本和疗效,并考虑了生产成本。结果在活动水平不受限制的情况下,实施 WWE 会在两年内为保险计划带来 1,002,408 美元的额外收益(0.56 美元 PMPM)。如果资格仅限于不活跃和不够活跃的个人,资助 WWE 将在两年内增加 571,931 美元(0.32 美元 PMPM)。在敏感性分析中,当每人成本增加 10 美元到 1000 美元,失败率降低 10%-50%(增强 WWE 收益的可持续性)时,在不限制资格的情况下,两年的预算影响从 242,684 美元到 6,985,674 美元不等;在限制资格的情况下,两年的预算影响从-43,194 美元(节省成本)到 4,484,122 美元不等。在缺乏公认的可负担性阈值的情况下,这些结果有助于比较 WWE 与其他行为干预措施的可负担性。