‘Non-maternal’ educational practices of mothers: contents, features, barriers to implementation

Irina A. Simonova, A. Shvetsova, Marina S. Krivoshchikova
{"title":"‘Non-maternal’ educational practices of mothers: contents, features, barriers to implementation","authors":"Irina A. Simonova, A. Shvetsova, Marina S. Krivoshchikova","doi":"10.32744/pse.2024.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The issue of studying the educational practices that women use to maintain their social, political and economic positions during changes in their usual living conditions due to caring for small children is updated by the need to develop effective programs to support motherhood – a priority task in the unfavorable demographic situation of recent years. The study aims to characterize and create a typology of educational activities used by Russian mothers as ‘non-maternal’ practices and to identify problematic aspects implementing these. Materials and methods. Methodologically, the study is based on the gender social construction theory and the concept of ‘non-maternal’ practices of mothers. Women's statements in thematic online communities were analyzed (22 communities, 248 statements); in-depth interviews (N=20), survey (N=471) and interview with an expert on advanced training programs for mothers in Sverdlovsk Oblast (Russian Federation) were conducted. Research results. 62% of statements and 36% of questionnaires contain references to learning experience. 58% of participants see education as a way to develop their potential and capabilities, 71% of statements contain information about entrepreneurial and work initiatives implemented as a result of training. 37% of informants do not know of any educational programs to support mothers. The typology includes the following criteria: motives (investment, leisure, existential, instrumental); field of activity (beauty; cooking, making clothes; interior design; photography; web design, IT; psychology, coaching; business education; driving; foreign languages; pedagogy; music); financial accessibility (paid, free); implementation (formal, informal). Conclusion. Personality problems and obstacles such as inconsistency in the maternity support system at the political and program levels are highlighted. Recommendations for optimizing systems for supporting mothers’ education are as follows: taking into account the contents of practices when forming a portfolio of state support programs, developing informal education resources, modernizing the infrastructure of educational sites, taking into account the needs of women with incomplete education; mentoring; reforming communication channels; working with public opinion in the field of maternal education.","PeriodicalId":422100,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of Science and Education","volume":"513 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of Science and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The issue of studying the educational practices that women use to maintain their social, political and economic positions during changes in their usual living conditions due to caring for small children is updated by the need to develop effective programs to support motherhood – a priority task in the unfavorable demographic situation of recent years. The study aims to characterize and create a typology of educational activities used by Russian mothers as ‘non-maternal’ practices and to identify problematic aspects implementing these. Materials and methods. Methodologically, the study is based on the gender social construction theory and the concept of ‘non-maternal’ practices of mothers. Women's statements in thematic online communities were analyzed (22 communities, 248 statements); in-depth interviews (N=20), survey (N=471) and interview with an expert on advanced training programs for mothers in Sverdlovsk Oblast (Russian Federation) were conducted. Research results. 62% of statements and 36% of questionnaires contain references to learning experience. 58% of participants see education as a way to develop their potential and capabilities, 71% of statements contain information about entrepreneurial and work initiatives implemented as a result of training. 37% of informants do not know of any educational programs to support mothers. The typology includes the following criteria: motives (investment, leisure, existential, instrumental); field of activity (beauty; cooking, making clothes; interior design; photography; web design, IT; psychology, coaching; business education; driving; foreign languages; pedagogy; music); financial accessibility (paid, free); implementation (formal, informal). Conclusion. Personality problems and obstacles such as inconsistency in the maternity support system at the political and program levels are highlighted. Recommendations for optimizing systems for supporting mothers’ education are as follows: taking into account the contents of practices when forming a portfolio of state support programs, developing informal education resources, modernizing the infrastructure of educational sites, taking into account the needs of women with incomplete education; mentoring; reforming communication channels; working with public opinion in the field of maternal education.
母亲的 "非母性 "教育实践:内容、特点、实施障碍
导言。研究妇女在因照顾年幼子女而导致其通常生活条件发生变化时为保持其社会、政治和经济地位而采 取的教育做法这一问题,是因为需要制定有效的计划来支持母性--这是近年来不利的人口状况下的一项 优先任务。本研究旨在对俄罗斯母亲使用的 "非母性 "做法的教育活动进行定性和分类,并找出实施这些活动的问题所在。材料和方法。在方法上,本研究以性别社会建构理论和母亲的 "非母性 "实践概念为基础。研究分析了妇女在专题在线社区中的发言(22 个社区,248 条发言);进行了深度访谈(20 人)、调查(471 人)以及对斯维尔德洛夫州(俄罗斯联邦)母亲高级培训项目专家的访谈。研究结果。62%的陈述和 36%的调查问卷都提到了学习经验。58% 的参与者将教育视为开发自身潜力和能力的途径,71% 的陈述中包含因培训而实施的创业和工作举措的信息。37% 的信息提供者不知道有任何支持母亲的教育计划。类型学包括以下标准:动机(投资、休闲、生存、工具);活动领域(美容;烹饪、制衣;室内设计;摄影;网页设计、信息技术;心理学、教练;商业教育;驾驶;外语;教育学;音乐);经济可得性(付费、免费);实施(正式、非正式)。结论强调了孕产妇支持系统在政治和计划层面不一致等个性问题和障碍。关于优化母亲教育支助系统的建议如下:在制定国家支助方案组合时考虑到实践内容,开发非正规教育资源,实现教育场所基础设施的现代化,考虑到未完成学业妇女的需求;指导;改革沟通渠道;在母亲教育领域与公众舆论合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信