Association between oral frailty and sarcopenia among frailty clinic outpatients: A cross-sectional study

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Koki Kawamura , Keisuke Maeda , Shuzo Miyahara , Akio Shimizu , Yuria Ishida , Junko Ueshima , Ayano Nagano , Hitoshi Kagaya , Yasumoto Matsui , Hidenori Arai , Naoharu Mori
{"title":"Association between oral frailty and sarcopenia among frailty clinic outpatients: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Koki Kawamura ,&nbsp;Keisuke Maeda ,&nbsp;Shuzo Miyahara ,&nbsp;Akio Shimizu ,&nbsp;Yuria Ishida ,&nbsp;Junko Ueshima ,&nbsp;Ayano Nagano ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Kagaya ,&nbsp;Yasumoto Matsui ,&nbsp;Hidenori Arai ,&nbsp;Naoharu Mori","doi":"10.1016/j.nut.2024.112438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of oral frailty and explore its relationship with oral function and sarcopenia among older outpatients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively included older patients who visited a frailty outpatient clinic. We assessed total oral frailty employing, among other measures, oral diadochokinesis (/ta/ sound) for tongue–lip movement and tongue pressure. Patients who did not meet the cut-off values for three or more of these were classified as having oral frailty. Sarcopenia was assessed according to Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria and analyzed for the relationship with oral function.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean ± standard deviation age of the 111 patients was 77.2 ± 5.7 y; 63 were women (57%). Fifteen patients (14%) had either sarcopenia or dynapenia. The overall prevalence of oral frailty was 38%, with no significant difference in its prevalence between the sarcopenia/dynapenia group (44%) and the robust (no sarcopenia/dynapenia) group (35%). The following oral function assessments significantly differed between the sarcopenia/dynapenia group and the robust group: median (interquartile range) total oral frailty score, 2 (2–4) and 2 (1–3) (<em>P</em> = 0.019); tongue–lip motor function, 5.4 ± 1.2 and 5.9 ± 1.2 times/s (<em>P</em> = 0.049); and tongue pressure, 27.3 ± 8.5 kPa and 31.7 ± 8.0 kPa (<em>P</em> = 0.009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Approximately 40% of patients exhibited a decline in oral function regardless of the presence of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia and dynapenia may particularly affect tongue function. Although assessing patients for sarcopenia is crucial, separate evaluations of oral function should also be considered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900724000881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

In this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of oral frailty and explore its relationship with oral function and sarcopenia among older outpatients.

Materials and Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively included older patients who visited a frailty outpatient clinic. We assessed total oral frailty employing, among other measures, oral diadochokinesis (/ta/ sound) for tongue–lip movement and tongue pressure. Patients who did not meet the cut-off values for three or more of these were classified as having oral frailty. Sarcopenia was assessed according to Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria and analyzed for the relationship with oral function.

Results

The mean ± standard deviation age of the 111 patients was 77.2 ± 5.7 y; 63 were women (57%). Fifteen patients (14%) had either sarcopenia or dynapenia. The overall prevalence of oral frailty was 38%, with no significant difference in its prevalence between the sarcopenia/dynapenia group (44%) and the robust (no sarcopenia/dynapenia) group (35%). The following oral function assessments significantly differed between the sarcopenia/dynapenia group and the robust group: median (interquartile range) total oral frailty score, 2 (2–4) and 2 (1–3) (P = 0.019); tongue–lip motor function, 5.4 ± 1.2 and 5.9 ± 1.2 times/s (P = 0.049); and tongue pressure, 27.3 ± 8.5 kPa and 31.7 ± 8.0 kPa (P = 0.009).

Conclusions

Approximately 40% of patients exhibited a decline in oral function regardless of the presence of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia and dynapenia may particularly affect tongue function. Although assessing patients for sarcopenia is crucial, separate evaluations of oral function should also be considered.

虚弱门诊患者口腔虚弱与肌肉疏松之间的关系:一项横断面研究
材料与方法 在这项横断面研究中,我们回顾性地纳入了到虚弱门诊就诊的老年患者。除其他测量方法外,我们还采用口腔舌唇运动和舌压的口腔双动力(/ta/音)来评估总体口腔虚弱程度。其中三项或三项以上未达到临界值的患者被归类为口腔虚弱。结果 111 名患者的平均年龄为 77.2±5.7 岁,女性 63 人(占 57%)。15名患者(14%)患有肌肉疏松症或动态肌无力症。口腔虚弱的总体患病率为 38%,而肌肉疏松症/动力不足症组(44%)与健壮组(无肌肉疏松症/动力不足症)(35%)的患病率无明显差异。以下口腔功能评估结果在肌肉疏松症/动态关节病组和健壮组之间存在明显差异:口腔虚弱总评分中位数(四分位数间距),2(2-4)和 2(1-3)(P = 0.019);舌唇运动功能,5.结论无论是否存在肌肉疏松症,约 40% 的患者表现出口腔功能下降。肌肉疏松症和动力不足症尤其会影响舌头功能。虽然评估患者是否患有肌肉疏松症至关重要,但也应考虑对口腔功能进行单独评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信