Vilaprisan for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis: results from a terminated phase 2b randomized controlled trial

Hugh S. Taylor M.D. , Liying Dong M.D., Ph.D. , Johanna Haikonen M.D. , Peter Oppelt M.D. , Karl Tamussino M.D. , Rene Wenzl M.D., Ph.D. , Thomas Faustmann M.D. , Esther Groettrup-Wolfers M.D., Ph.D. , Xiaowei Ren Ph.D. , Christian Seitz M.D., Ph.D.
{"title":"Vilaprisan for the treatment of symptomatic endometriosis: results from a terminated phase 2b randomized controlled trial","authors":"Hugh S. Taylor M.D. ,&nbsp;Liying Dong M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Johanna Haikonen M.D. ,&nbsp;Peter Oppelt M.D. ,&nbsp;Karl Tamussino M.D. ,&nbsp;Rene Wenzl M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Thomas Faustmann M.D. ,&nbsp;Esther Groettrup-Wolfers M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Ren Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Christian Seitz M.D., Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of vilaprisan vs. placebo in participants with symptomatic endometriosis.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 2b trial (NCT03573336). The initially planned sample size was 315 patients. Recruitment was paused to assess long-term toxicity findings in rodents; although the findings were assessed as likely to be of limited clinical relevance in humans, the study was closed by the sponsor. During the pause, enrolled patients completed 3 or 6 months of treatment per their assigned regimen.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>University hospitals, a regional hospital, and a private clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><p>Premenopausal adults with confirmed endometriosis and moderate-to-severe pelvic pain (≥4/10 on a numerical rating scale) were enrolled. Inclusion required protocol adherence, including ≥24 diary entries, and an average pain score of ≥3.5.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive vilaprisan (2 mg), vilaprisan (4 mg), or placebo.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was a change in the 7-day mean “worst pain” (per the endometriosis symptom diary item 1) from baseline to month 3. All analyses were descriptive only.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight participants were randomly assigned to treatment before the study pause: 6 received vilaprisan (4 mg, n = 4 and 2 mg, n = 2), and 2 received placebo. The 6 vilaprisan recipients experienced an improvement in endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, whereas the 2 placebo recipients experienced no change or increased pain; all 8 participants had decreased use of pain medication. Bleeding intensity decreased from baseline in the vilaprisan group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study findings suggest that vilaprisan may improve outcomes in patients with endometriosis. Further studies in larger populations would be needed to accurately assess treatment effects.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Trial Registration Number</h3><p>NCT03573336</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 189-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124000436/pdfft?md5=aef1ec4aeb107210c8b123eaf24560d0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666334124000436-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124000436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of vilaprisan vs. placebo in participants with symptomatic endometriosis.

Design

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 2b trial (NCT03573336). The initially planned sample size was 315 patients. Recruitment was paused to assess long-term toxicity findings in rodents; although the findings were assessed as likely to be of limited clinical relevance in humans, the study was closed by the sponsor. During the pause, enrolled patients completed 3 or 6 months of treatment per their assigned regimen.

Setting

University hospitals, a regional hospital, and a private clinic.

Patients

Premenopausal adults with confirmed endometriosis and moderate-to-severe pelvic pain (≥4/10 on a numerical rating scale) were enrolled. Inclusion required protocol adherence, including ≥24 diary entries, and an average pain score of ≥3.5.

Intervention

Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive vilaprisan (2 mg), vilaprisan (4 mg), or placebo.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was a change in the 7-day mean “worst pain” (per the endometriosis symptom diary item 1) from baseline to month 3. All analyses were descriptive only.

Results

Eight participants were randomly assigned to treatment before the study pause: 6 received vilaprisan (4 mg, n = 4 and 2 mg, n = 2), and 2 received placebo. The 6 vilaprisan recipients experienced an improvement in endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, whereas the 2 placebo recipients experienced no change or increased pain; all 8 participants had decreased use of pain medication. Bleeding intensity decreased from baseline in the vilaprisan group.

Conclusion

The study findings suggest that vilaprisan may improve outcomes in patients with endometriosis. Further studies in larger populations would be needed to accurately assess treatment effects.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03573336

用于治疗症状性子宫内膜异位症的 Vilaprisan:已终止的 2b 期随机对照试验的结果
设计多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组 2b 期试验(NCT03573336)。最初计划的样本量为 315 例患者。为评估啮齿类动物的长期毒性结果,暂停了招募;尽管评估结果被认为对人类的临床意义有限,但赞助商还是终止了这项研究。在暂停期间,入组患者按照指定方案完成了 3 个月或 6 个月的治疗。患者入组对象为已确诊患有子宫内膜异位症且伴有中度至重度盆腔疼痛(数字评分表≥4/10)的绝经成年人。干预参与者按1:1:1的比例随机分配接受维拉普利生(2毫克)、维拉普利生(4毫克)或安慰剂。主要结果测量主要结果是7天平均 "最严重疼痛"(根据子宫内膜异位症症状日记第1项)从基线到第3个月的变化。 结果8名参与者在研究暂停前被随机分配接受治疗:其中 6 人接受了维拉普生治疗(4 毫克,n = 4;2 毫克,n = 2),2 人接受了安慰剂治疗。接受维拉普利生治疗的 6 位患者的子宫内膜异位症相关盆腔疼痛有所改善,而接受安慰剂治疗的 2 位患者的疼痛没有变化或加剧;所有 8 位患者都减少了止痛药的使用。结论研究结果表明,维拉普利生可能会改善子宫内膜异位症患者的治疗效果。临床试验注册号NCT03573336
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信