Antihypertensive Medications and Risk of Melanoma and Keratinocyte Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Olivia G. Cohen , Matthew Taylor , Cassandra Mohr , Kevin T. Nead , Candice L. Hinkston , Sharon H. Giordano , Sinead M. Langan , David J. Margolis , Mackenzie R. Wehner
{"title":"Antihypertensive Medications and Risk of Melanoma and Keratinocyte Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Olivia G. Cohen ,&nbsp;Matthew Taylor ,&nbsp;Cassandra Mohr ,&nbsp;Kevin T. Nead ,&nbsp;Candice L. Hinkston ,&nbsp;Sharon H. Giordano ,&nbsp;Sinead M. Langan ,&nbsp;David J. Margolis ,&nbsp;Mackenzie R. Wehner","doi":"10.1016/j.xjidi.2024.100272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Some antihypertensive medications are photosensitizing. The implications for skin cancer risk remain unclear because results from prior studies are inconsistent and as new evidence is published. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between antihypertensives and common skin cancers (cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma) and to evaluate dose–response relationships. Forty-four articles met inclusion criteria, and 42 could be meta analyzed. Increased risks were seen for basal cell carcinoma with calcium channel blockers (relative risk [RR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11–1.22), diuretics (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03–1.10), and thiazides (RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04–1.16); for squamous cell carcinoma with calcium channel blockers (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.01–1.14), diuretics (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.17–1.43), and thiazides (RR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.15–1.61); and for melanoma in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03–1.14), calcium channel blockers (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03–1.12), and thiazides (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02–1.17). The quality of evidence was low or very low. We observed evidence for dose–response for thiazides with basal cell carcinoma; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and thiazides with squamous cell carcinoma; and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and thiazides with melanoma. Our meta-analysis supports a potential causal association between some antihypertensives, particularly diuretics, and skin cancer risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73548,"journal":{"name":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000195/pdfft?md5=0a6957143e51e056ecf1465c49643308&pid=1-s2.0-S2667026724000195-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667026724000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some antihypertensive medications are photosensitizing. The implications for skin cancer risk remain unclear because results from prior studies are inconsistent and as new evidence is published. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between antihypertensives and common skin cancers (cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and melanoma) and to evaluate dose–response relationships. Forty-four articles met inclusion criteria, and 42 could be meta analyzed. Increased risks were seen for basal cell carcinoma with calcium channel blockers (relative risk [RR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11–1.22), diuretics (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.03–1.10), and thiazides (RR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.04–1.16); for squamous cell carcinoma with calcium channel blockers (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.01–1.14), diuretics (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.17–1.43), and thiazides (RR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.15–1.61); and for melanoma in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.03–1.14), calcium channel blockers (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03–1.12), and thiazides (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.02–1.17). The quality of evidence was low or very low. We observed evidence for dose–response for thiazides with basal cell carcinoma; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and thiazides with squamous cell carcinoma; and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics, and thiazides with melanoma. Our meta-analysis supports a potential causal association between some antihypertensives, particularly diuretics, and skin cancer risk.

抗高血压药物与黑色素瘤和角质细胞癌的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析
有些降压药具有光敏性。由于之前的研究结果不一致,而且随着新证据的公布,对皮肤癌风险的影响仍不明确。我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估降压药与常见皮肤癌(皮肤鳞状细胞癌、基底细胞癌和黑色素瘤)之间的关系,并评估剂量反应关系。有 44 篇文章符合纳入标准,其中 42 篇可进行元分析。使用钙通道阻滞剂(相对风险 [RR] = 1.17,95% 置信区间 [CI] = 1.11-1.22)、利尿剂(RR = 1.06,95% CI = 1.03-1.10)和噻嗪类药物(RR = 1.10,95% CI = 1.04-1.16)会增加基底细胞癌的风险;使用钙通道阻滞剂会增加鳞状细胞癌的风险(RR = 1.08,95% CI = 1.01-1.14)、利尿剂(RR = 1.29,95% CI = 1.17-1.43)和噻嗪类药物(RR = 1.36,95% CI = 1.15-1.61);使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗黑色素瘤(RR = 1.09,95% CI = 1.03-1.14)、钙通道阻滞剂(RR = 1.08,95% CI = 1.03-1.12)和噻嗪类药物(RR = 1.09,95% CI = 1.02-1.17)。证据质量较低或很低。我们观察到噻嗪类药物与基底细胞癌;血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、利尿剂和噻嗪类药物与鳞状细胞癌;血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、利尿剂和噻嗪类药物与黑色素瘤的剂量反应证据。我们的荟萃分析支持某些降压药(尤其是利尿剂)与皮肤癌风险之间可能存在因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信