Конституирующие нарративы локальной исторической памяти жителей регионов Сибири: между личным и общественным

С.А. Чернышев
{"title":"Конституирующие нарративы локальной исторической памяти жителей регионов Сибири: между личным и общественным","authors":"С.А. Чернышев","doi":"10.33876/2311-0546/2024-1/7-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the narratives of local historical self-identification of residents of the Siberian regions of Russia. The main objective of the study was to search for specific ideas, not related to the typical historical myths of the Russian periphery, through which Siberians construct their own social identity. The information base for the study was the results of focus groups conducted in 9 cities of Siberia and the Urals: Perm, Tyumen, Omsk, Novosibirsk, Barnaul, Kemerovo, Tomsk, Krasnoyarsk, Irkutsk. It was revealed that the local historical self-identification of Siberians is based on the perceived uncritically typical heroic narrative of the Russian periphery, associated with its development by representatives of the “country,” which is understood as the central government. Among the narratives of local historical memory, narrow local subjects associated with specific territories dominate - from the construction of a bridge across the Ob in Novosibirsk to the development of the coal industry in Kuzbass. Common myths are the narratives of the heroic “development of Siberia” from Ermak to Soviet industrial construction projects. In this form, the identified set of historical myths has a clearly Moscow-centric character and cannot serve as a basis for constructing local identity. However, as soon as the peripheral national narrative comes into conflict with the personal or family experiences of respondents, it corrodes. This leads to a critical understanding of the constitutive narratives of local historical self-identification.","PeriodicalId":216882,"journal":{"name":"Вестник антропологии (Herald of Anthropology)","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Вестник антропологии (Herald of Anthropology)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33876/2311-0546/2024-1/7-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the narratives of local historical self-identification of residents of the Siberian regions of Russia. The main objective of the study was to search for specific ideas, not related to the typical historical myths of the Russian periphery, through which Siberians construct their own social identity. The information base for the study was the results of focus groups conducted in 9 cities of Siberia and the Urals: Perm, Tyumen, Omsk, Novosibirsk, Barnaul, Kemerovo, Tomsk, Krasnoyarsk, Irkutsk. It was revealed that the local historical self-identification of Siberians is based on the perceived uncritically typical heroic narrative of the Russian periphery, associated with its development by representatives of the “country,” which is understood as the central government. Among the narratives of local historical memory, narrow local subjects associated with specific territories dominate - from the construction of a bridge across the Ob in Novosibirsk to the development of the coal industry in Kuzbass. Common myths are the narratives of the heroic “development of Siberia” from Ermak to Soviet industrial construction projects. In this form, the identified set of historical myths has a clearly Moscow-centric character and cannot serve as a basis for constructing local identity. However, as soon as the peripheral national narrative comes into conflict with the personal or family experiences of respondents, it corrodes. This leads to a critical understanding of the constitutive narratives of local historical self-identification.
西伯利亚地区居民的地方历史记忆构成叙事:在个人与公共之间
文章研究了俄罗斯西伯利亚地区居民对当地历史自我认同的叙述。研究的主要目的是寻找与俄罗斯周边地区典型历史神话无关的具体观点,西伯利亚人通过这些观点构建自己的社会认同。研究的信息基础是在西伯利亚和乌拉尔地区 9 个城市开展的焦点小组活动的结果:这些城市是:彼尔姆、秋明、鄂木斯克、新西伯利亚、巴尔瑙尔、克麦罗沃、托木斯克、克拉斯诺亚尔斯克、伊尔库茨克。研究表明,西伯利亚人的地方历史自我认同是建立在对俄罗斯边缘地区典型英雄叙事的不加批判的认知基础之上的,这种叙事与 "国家"(被理解为中央政府)代表的发展相关联。在地方历史记忆的叙事中,与特定地域相关的狭隘地方主题占据主导地位--从新西伯利亚建造横跨鄂毕河的大桥到库兹巴斯的煤炭工业发展。共同的神话是关于 "西伯利亚发展 "的英雄叙事,从埃尔马克到苏联工业建设项目。在这种形式下,所确定的一系列历史神话明显具有以莫斯科为中心的特点,不能作为构建地方特性的基础。然而,一旦边缘国家叙事与受访者的个人或家庭经历发生冲突,它就会受到侵蚀。这就导致了对地方历史自我认同的构成叙事的批判性理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信