Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the BCPT Eight Symptom Scale (BESS) in patients with breast cancer

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yi Kuang , Feng Jing , Lichen Tang , Jiajia Qiu , Weijie Xing
{"title":"Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the BCPT Eight Symptom Scale (BESS) in patients with breast cancer","authors":"Yi Kuang ,&nbsp;Feng Jing ,&nbsp;Lichen Tang ,&nbsp;Jiajia Qiu ,&nbsp;Weijie Xing","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to translate the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial Eight Symptom Scale (BESS) into Chinese and subsequently examine the latent constructs and psychometric properties of the Chinese BESS (C-BESS) among patients with breast cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In Phase 1, the BESS was translated from English into Chinese using the FACIT translation method. An expert panel was convened to assess the content validity, and pilot testing was performed with 20 patients with breast cancer. In Phase 2, a total of 427 patients with breast cancer from four Grade-A public hospitals in China were recruited to examine psychometric properties of the C-BESS. The internal consistency was evaluated based on the Cronbach's α, and the construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The C-BESS demonstrated satisfactory content validity index (item-level content validity index [I-CVI]: 0.8–1.0; scale-level content validity index [S-CVI]: 0.97). The Cronbach's α value for the entire C-BESS scale was 0.92. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that eight-factor structure of the C-BESS was a good fit to the data (CFI = 0.959, AGFI = 0.904, RMSEA = 0.05, RMR = 0.029). The scale exhibited good convergent validity and discriminant validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study translated and validated the C-BESS for use in the Chinese population. The results demonstrate that the C-BESS exhibits good reliability and validity, with ideal psychometric properties for assessing the symptom burden in Chinese patients with breast cancer. This tool can be effectively integrated into the routine symptom monitoring of patients with breast cancer in China, helping Chinese clinical professionals in conducting comprehensive assessments of symptom burden.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524000696/pdfft?md5=73670e448dd1b0c5d4735287b7a2418f&pid=1-s2.0-S2347562524000696-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524000696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to translate the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial Eight Symptom Scale (BESS) into Chinese and subsequently examine the latent constructs and psychometric properties of the Chinese BESS (C-BESS) among patients with breast cancer.

Methods

In Phase 1, the BESS was translated from English into Chinese using the FACIT translation method. An expert panel was convened to assess the content validity, and pilot testing was performed with 20 patients with breast cancer. In Phase 2, a total of 427 patients with breast cancer from four Grade-A public hospitals in China were recruited to examine psychometric properties of the C-BESS. The internal consistency was evaluated based on the Cronbach's α, and the construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and discriminant validity.

Results

The C-BESS demonstrated satisfactory content validity index (item-level content validity index [I-CVI]: 0.8–1.0; scale-level content validity index [S-CVI]: 0.97). The Cronbach's α value for the entire C-BESS scale was 0.92. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that eight-factor structure of the C-BESS was a good fit to the data (CFI = 0.959, AGFI = 0.904, RMSEA = 0.05, RMR = 0.029). The scale exhibited good convergent validity and discriminant validity.

Conclusions

This study translated and validated the C-BESS for use in the Chinese population. The results demonstrate that the C-BESS exhibits good reliability and validity, with ideal psychometric properties for assessing the symptom burden in Chinese patients with breast cancer. This tool can be effectively integrated into the routine symptom monitoring of patients with breast cancer in China, helping Chinese clinical professionals in conducting comprehensive assessments of symptom burden.

在乳腺癌患者中翻译和验证中文版 BCPT 八种症状量表 (BESS)
目的 本研究旨在将乳腺癌预防试验八种症状量表(BESS)翻译成中文,并随后研究中文BESS(C-BESS)在乳腺癌患者中的潜在结构和心理测量学特性。方法 在第一阶段,采用FACIT翻译法将BESS从英文翻译成中文。召集专家小组评估内容效度,并对 20 名乳腺癌患者进行了试点测试。在第二阶段,从中国四家甲级公立医院共招募了 427 名乳腺癌患者,对 C-BESS 的心理测量学特性进行了研究。结果 C-BESS的内容效度指数令人满意(项目级内容效度指数[I-CVI]:0.8-1.0;量表级内容效度指数[I-CVI]:0.8-1.0):0.8-1.0;量表级内容效度指数 [S-CVI]:0.97:0.97).整个 C-BESS 量表的 Cronbach's α 值为 0.92。确认性因素分析表明,C-BESS 的八因素结构与数据拟合良好(CFI = 0.959,AGFI = 0.904,RMSEA = 0.05,RMR = 0.029)。该量表具有良好的收敛效度和区分效度。结果表明,C-BESS 具有良好的信度和效度,在评估中国乳腺癌患者的症状负担方面具有理想的心理测量学特性。该工具可有效地整合到中国乳腺癌患者的常规症状监测中,帮助中国临床专业人员对症状负担进行全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信