Current practice in autologous rib and costal-cartilage harvest for rhinoplasty: A systematic review

Mengyuan Jiang , Haizhong Huo , Lu Zhang
{"title":"Current practice in autologous rib and costal-cartilage harvest for rhinoplasty: A systematic review","authors":"Mengyuan Jiang ,&nbsp;Haizhong Huo ,&nbsp;Lu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cjprs.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Autologous costal grafts are used universally in clinical practice for rhinoplasty and reconstruction. However, surgeons worldwide have not agreed on the details of graft harvesting, including rib selection, side preference, operation mode, cutting methods, and handling of the periosteum and perichondrium. This study aimed to provide an overview of the novel techniques used for auto-rib harvesting in rhinoplasty within the past 5 years and identify potential avenues for future research.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched for related articles in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from 2019 to 2023, summarized crucial but controversial steps in recent practice, and analyzed their theoretical basis and clinical feasibility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Auto-rib and cartilage open harvest is still mainstream in rhinoplasty and reconstruction, with the 5th to 8th ribs and cartilage being the most used. The laparoscopic harvest is gaining attention, being second only to the open harvest, with the 9th/10th ribs and cartilages being particularly convenient. The clinical applications of full-cut and split-cut methods differ in their advantages. Except for some special reasons, almost all studies tended to preserve the periosteum and perichondrium <em>in situ</em>, and few surgeons chose to harvest the grafts on the left side.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Multiple techniques have emerged, requiring surgeons to balance the benefits and risks of various strategies at each step. New theories and techniques should be fully tested promptly and in clinical practice before wide application. Overall, a professional consensus is needed for better directivity, precision, and stability in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":65600,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209669112400013X/pdfft?md5=13332668ad1380b51a73e4ebe3788354&pid=1-s2.0-S209669112400013X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S209669112400013X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Autologous costal grafts are used universally in clinical practice for rhinoplasty and reconstruction. However, surgeons worldwide have not agreed on the details of graft harvesting, including rib selection, side preference, operation mode, cutting methods, and handling of the periosteum and perichondrium. This study aimed to provide an overview of the novel techniques used for auto-rib harvesting in rhinoplasty within the past 5 years and identify potential avenues for future research.

Methods

We searched for related articles in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from 2019 to 2023, summarized crucial but controversial steps in recent practice, and analyzed their theoretical basis and clinical feasibility.

Results

Auto-rib and cartilage open harvest is still mainstream in rhinoplasty and reconstruction, with the 5th to 8th ribs and cartilage being the most used. The laparoscopic harvest is gaining attention, being second only to the open harvest, with the 9th/10th ribs and cartilages being particularly convenient. The clinical applications of full-cut and split-cut methods differ in their advantages. Except for some special reasons, almost all studies tended to preserve the periosteum and perichondrium in situ, and few surgeons chose to harvest the grafts on the left side.

Conclusion

Multiple techniques have emerged, requiring surgeons to balance the benefits and risks of various strategies at each step. New theories and techniques should be fully tested promptly and in clinical practice before wide application. Overall, a professional consensus is needed for better directivity, precision, and stability in clinical practice.

自体肋骨和肋软骨采集用于鼻整形术的当前实践:系统回顾
背景自体肋骨移植物被普遍用于鼻整形和鼻重建的临床实践中。然而,世界各地的外科医生对移植物采集的细节,包括肋骨的选择、偏好的一侧、操作模式、切割方法以及骨膜和软骨膜的处理等,尚未达成一致意见。本研究旨在概述过去 5 年中用于鼻整形术中自体肋骨采集的新技术,并确定未来研究的潜在途径。方法我们在 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 中检索了 2019 年至 2023 年的相关文章,总结了近期实践中关键但有争议的步骤,并分析了其理论基础和临床可行性。结果自体肋骨和软骨开放式采集仍是鼻整形和重建的主流,其中第 5 至第 8 根肋骨和软骨使用最多。腹腔镜取材越来越受到重视,仅次于开放式取材,其中第 9/10 肋骨和软骨的取材尤为方便。全切法和分切法的临床应用优势各不相同。除一些特殊原因外,几乎所有的研究都倾向于原位保留骨膜和软骨周围,很少有外科医生选择在左侧采集移植物。新理论和新技术在广泛应用之前,应及时在临床实践中进行充分检验。总之,要想在临床实践中获得更好的指导性、精确性和稳定性,需要达成专业共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Pathology and Medical Technology, Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信