{"title":"Lifespan integration therapy: Patients’ discourse about outcomes and integration feeling","authors":"Maylis Bahans , Grégoire Baudin , Manon Dubourg , Aurélie Untas","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2024.100399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Lifespan Integration (LI) therapy is a relatively recent mind-body psychotherapy, primarily developed to help survivors in the treatment of trauma. The therapy resets integration, a high-level process promoting mental health, well-being, and flexible adaptation to the environment. This study aims to explore the perception of LI outcomes and “integration feeling” through LI patients’ perspectives.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Twelve patients were recruited via LI-certified therapists and took part in an interview (50 % men; mean age 45.1 years; with therapies lasting 1–5 years). Each interview was conducted using a guide, and discourse was analyzed using a general inductive approach (interjudge fidelity = 0.750).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The analysis revealed six salient themes: <em>relation to oneself</em> (including well-being, self-acceptance, self-consciousness, self-knowledge, self-care, self-image, and self-sufficiency), <em>skills</em> (emotional regulation, self-determination, and parenting skills), <em>relation to others</em> (involving relational openness, authenticity, independence, acceptance of others, and social connections readjustment), <em>relation to reality</em> (change in perspective and acceptance of reality), <em>integration feeling</em> (unification, appeasement, strength, reconnection and focusing), <em>process</em> (effectiveness perception, sensations, disorganization, non-linear evolution, commitment to therapy, trust with therapist, and difficulty of observing changes), and <em>symptomatic improvement</em> (depression, anxiety, substance use, and other symptoms).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study highlights the processes that improve LI therapy efficacy according to patients. More generally, it sheds some light on the integration process and its consequences underlying the unity of identity and consciousness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749924000231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Lifespan Integration (LI) therapy is a relatively recent mind-body psychotherapy, primarily developed to help survivors in the treatment of trauma. The therapy resets integration, a high-level process promoting mental health, well-being, and flexible adaptation to the environment. This study aims to explore the perception of LI outcomes and “integration feeling” through LI patients’ perspectives.
Method
Twelve patients were recruited via LI-certified therapists and took part in an interview (50 % men; mean age 45.1 years; with therapies lasting 1–5 years). Each interview was conducted using a guide, and discourse was analyzed using a general inductive approach (interjudge fidelity = 0.750).
Results
The analysis revealed six salient themes: relation to oneself (including well-being, self-acceptance, self-consciousness, self-knowledge, self-care, self-image, and self-sufficiency), skills (emotional regulation, self-determination, and parenting skills), relation to others (involving relational openness, authenticity, independence, acceptance of others, and social connections readjustment), relation to reality (change in perspective and acceptance of reality), integration feeling (unification, appeasement, strength, reconnection and focusing), process (effectiveness perception, sensations, disorganization, non-linear evolution, commitment to therapy, trust with therapist, and difficulty of observing changes), and symptomatic improvement (depression, anxiety, substance use, and other symptoms).
Conclusion
This study highlights the processes that improve LI therapy efficacy according to patients. More generally, it sheds some light on the integration process and its consequences underlying the unity of identity and consciousness.