The Value of Knife Add-on to Vessel Sealing Devices: A Retrospective Comparison of Covidien Ligasure Impact and ERBE Biclamp 200 in Non-descent Vaginal Hysterectomy

Ahmed Kasem Mohamed Zain Eldin, Ashraf Elmantwe, Hossam Elbanhawy, Mohamed El noury, Ahmed Sabra
{"title":"The Value of Knife Add-on to Vessel Sealing Devices: A Retrospective Comparison of Covidien Ligasure Impact and ERBE Biclamp 200 in Non-descent Vaginal Hysterectomy","authors":"Ahmed Kasem Mohamed Zain Eldin, Ashraf Elmantwe, Hossam Elbanhawy, Mohamed El noury, Ahmed Sabra","doi":"10.21608/bmfj.2024.239516.1910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Background: non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH)is the differentiating procedure of gynecologic surgeons, introducing a new technique is crucial. Aim: To contrast perioperative consequences of employing Covidien LigaSure Impact™ with built-in add-on knife (Curved Large Jaw Open Sealer / Divider) and ERBE BiClamp®200C (Curved Sealer) standalone forceps with use of separate scissors for executing NDVH. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis included 164 NDVH executed between January 2015 and April 2023 in Benha University Hospital. The LigaSure Impact™ group included 86 NDVH. The BiClamp® group included 78 NDVH. Results: Both groups showed no significant dissimilarity regarding their age, BMI, parity, preoperative mean hemoglobin levels, associated comorbidities, numbers of prior Cesarean section (CS), the indications for hysterectomy, the preoperative HBA1c or the preoperative hospital administration(P>0.05). Also, there was no difference between both groups in operative time, blood loss, removed uterine weight, intra-operative complications, need for blood transfusion, rates of incidental cystotomy, need for additional general anesthesia intraoperatively, shorter postoperative hospital stay, wound complications, less consumption of analgesic and lower amount as well as the need for postoperative venous thromboembolic prophylaxis (VTE), earlier ambulation, earlier return to daily activity, earlier resumption of coital activity, need to reoperate for wound-related complication (P>0.05). Conclusion: NDVH could be safely and efficiently achieved either Covidien LigaSure Impact™ or by ERBE BiClamp®200C. The gynecologist should follow the recommendations of gynecologic societies at least for feasible mobile non-scared uteri with uterine size up to 12 weeks needed to be extirpated to be accomplished vaginally.","PeriodicalId":503219,"journal":{"name":"Benha Medical Journal","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2024.239516.1910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Background: non-descent vaginal hysterectomy (NDVH)is the differentiating procedure of gynecologic surgeons, introducing a new technique is crucial. Aim: To contrast perioperative consequences of employing Covidien LigaSure Impact™ with built-in add-on knife (Curved Large Jaw Open Sealer / Divider) and ERBE BiClamp®200C (Curved Sealer) standalone forceps with use of separate scissors for executing NDVH. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis included 164 NDVH executed between January 2015 and April 2023 in Benha University Hospital. The LigaSure Impact™ group included 86 NDVH. The BiClamp® group included 78 NDVH. Results: Both groups showed no significant dissimilarity regarding their age, BMI, parity, preoperative mean hemoglobin levels, associated comorbidities, numbers of prior Cesarean section (CS), the indications for hysterectomy, the preoperative HBA1c or the preoperative hospital administration(P>0.05). Also, there was no difference between both groups in operative time, blood loss, removed uterine weight, intra-operative complications, need for blood transfusion, rates of incidental cystotomy, need for additional general anesthesia intraoperatively, shorter postoperative hospital stay, wound complications, less consumption of analgesic and lower amount as well as the need for postoperative venous thromboembolic prophylaxis (VTE), earlier ambulation, earlier return to daily activity, earlier resumption of coital activity, need to reoperate for wound-related complication (P>0.05). Conclusion: NDVH could be safely and efficiently achieved either Covidien LigaSure Impact™ or by ERBE BiClamp®200C. The gynecologist should follow the recommendations of gynecologic societies at least for feasible mobile non-scared uteri with uterine size up to 12 weeks needed to be extirpated to be accomplished vaginally.
血管封堵装置的附加刀的价值:Covidien Ligasure Impact 和 ERBE Biclamp 200 在非后天性阴道子宫切除术中的回顾性比较
:背景:非后天性阴道子宫切除术(NDVH)是妇科外科医生的特色手术,引进新技术至关重要。目的:对比使用带内置附加刀的 Covidien LigaSure Impact™(弯形大钳开口封堵器/分割器)和 ERBE BiClamp®200C (弯形封堵器)独立镊子与使用单独剪刀实施 NDVH 的围手术期后果。患者和方法:回顾性分析包括 2015 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月期间在本哈大学医院实施的 164 例 NDVH。LigaSure Impact™ 组包括 86 例 NDVH。BiClamp® 组包括 78 例 NDVH。结果:两组在年龄、体重指数(BMI)、胎次、术前平均血红蛋白水平、相关合并症、既往剖宫产次数(CS)、子宫切除术指征、术前 HBA1c 或术前医院管理方面均无明显差异(P>0.05)。此外,两组在手术时间、失血量、切除子宫重量、术中并发症、输血需求、意外膀胱切开率、术中追加全身麻醉需求、术后住院时间缩短、伤口并发症、镇痛剂用量减少等方面均无差异、伤口并发症、镇痛剂用量减少、术后静脉血栓栓塞预防(VTE)需要量减少、更早下地行走、更早恢复日常活动、更早恢复同房活动、因伤口相关并发症需要再次手术(P>0.05)。05).结论Covidien LigaSure Impact™ 或 ERBE BiClamp®200C 均可安全有效地实现 NDVH。妇科医生应遵循妇科协会的建议,至少在可行的情况下,对子宫大小不超过 12 周的活动性无疤痕子宫进行阴道切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信