The Discussion of the Tendences and Evolution of the European Security Issues in the British Parliament (1990-2010)

D. Ivanov
{"title":"The Discussion of the Tendences and Evolution of the European Security Issues in the British Parliament (1990-2010)","authors":"D. Ivanov","doi":"10.46869/2707-6776-2023-24-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the discussion of European security issues in the British Parliament in the post-bipolar period. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the British establishment had to revise the foreign policy doctrine of the United Kingdom to adapt it to the demands of the post-bipolar age. During this period, parliamentarians discussed the future role of NATO after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact. The political establishment has continued to define NATO as the foundation of the Euroatlantic system of collective security. After the direct military threat from the USSR vanished, the British elites had difficulties formulating the strategic goal of the North Atlantic alliance's existence. Another important topic was the creation of the European Union, its future enlargement in Central-Eastern Europe, and the search for the best approach to British European policy under new circumstances. There was an agreement that the idea of the “Europe of Nations” was best suited to British national interests. The British government also deterred attempts by France and Germany to transform the European Union into a federal superstate. The Balkan crisis also became a central topic that caused heated debates in Parliament in an attempt to find a path to a peaceful settlement. In the case of military interventions in local conflicts, the British establishment tried to evade direct intervention in the Balkan crisis but was forced to reconsider its position under growing pressure from allies, who began to experience economic and reputational damage. The humanitarian intervention in Kosovo created a precedent that was used to justify interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Additionally, the conflicts in Nagorno-Karabakh and Georgia were also discussed.","PeriodicalId":211354,"journal":{"name":"Problems of World History","volume":"20 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of World History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46869/2707-6776-2023-24-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the discussion of European security issues in the British Parliament in the post-bipolar period. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the British establishment had to revise the foreign policy doctrine of the United Kingdom to adapt it to the demands of the post-bipolar age. During this period, parliamentarians discussed the future role of NATO after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact. The political establishment has continued to define NATO as the foundation of the Euroatlantic system of collective security. After the direct military threat from the USSR vanished, the British elites had difficulties formulating the strategic goal of the North Atlantic alliance's existence. Another important topic was the creation of the European Union, its future enlargement in Central-Eastern Europe, and the search for the best approach to British European policy under new circumstances. There was an agreement that the idea of the “Europe of Nations” was best suited to British national interests. The British government also deterred attempts by France and Germany to transform the European Union into a federal superstate. The Balkan crisis also became a central topic that caused heated debates in Parliament in an attempt to find a path to a peaceful settlement. In the case of military interventions in local conflicts, the British establishment tried to evade direct intervention in the Balkan crisis but was forced to reconsider its position under growing pressure from allies, who began to experience economic and reputational damage. The humanitarian intervention in Kosovo created a precedent that was used to justify interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq. Additionally, the conflicts in Nagorno-Karabakh and Georgia were also discussed.
英国议会对欧洲安全问题的讨论趋势和演变(1990-2010 年)
文章专门讨论了后两极时代英国议会对欧洲安全问题的讨论。苏联解体后,英国政府不得不修改其外交政策理论,以适应后两极时代的要求。在此期间,议员们讨论了华约解体后北约的未来作用。政治机构继续将北约定义为欧洲-大西洋集体安全体系的基础。在来自苏联的直接军事威胁消失后,英国精英们难以制定北大西洋联盟存在的战略目标。另一个重要议题是欧盟的成立、欧盟未来在中东欧的扩张,以及在新形势下寻求英国欧洲政策的最佳方法。与会者一致认为,"万国欧洲 "的理念最符合英国的国家利益。英国政府还阻止了法国和德国将欧盟转变为联邦制超级国家的企图。巴尔干危机也成为议会激烈辩论的核心议题,试图找到和平解决的途径。在对地方冲突进行军事干预方面,英国政府试图回避对巴尔干危机的直接干预,但在盟国越来越大的压力下被迫重新考虑其立场,因为盟国开始遭受经济和声誉上的损失。对科索沃的人道主义干预开创了一个先例,被用来为干预阿富汗和伊拉克提供理由。此外,还讨论了纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫和格鲁吉亚的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书