Becoming the change we want to see: Aspirations and initial progress with diversity, equity, access, and inclusion practices to create welcoming environments and center community in informal science institutions

IF 1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Karen Peterman, Lynn Chesnut, M. J. Gathings, Keshia Martin, Allison Black Maier, Jane Robertson Evia, Regina Ayala Chávez, Maren Harris, K. C. Busch, Darrell Stover, Lincoln R. Larson, Kathryn Stevenson, Charles Yelton
{"title":"Becoming the change we want to see: Aspirations and initial progress with diversity, equity, access, and inclusion practices to create welcoming environments and center community in informal science institutions","authors":"Karen Peterman,&nbsp;Lynn Chesnut,&nbsp;M. J. Gathings,&nbsp;Keshia Martin,&nbsp;Allison Black Maier,&nbsp;Jane Robertson Evia,&nbsp;Regina Ayala Chávez,&nbsp;Maren Harris,&nbsp;K. C. Busch,&nbsp;Darrell Stover,&nbsp;Lincoln R. Larson,&nbsp;Kathryn Stevenson,&nbsp;Charles Yelton","doi":"10.1111/cura.12621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study focuses on the diversity, equity, access, and inclusion (DEAI) practices of informal science institutions (ISI) that are part of a statewide grants program. Data were collected to understand how ISIs interpret and implement DEAI in thought and action in their efforts to create more welcoming spaces for members of communities that are often underrepresented or marginalized in informal learning spaces. Modeled after the Cultural Competence Learning Institute's (CCLI) Framework, survey data were collected to understand DEAI practices being used to create welcoming environments. Interview data were collected 2 years later to understand how ISIs collaborate with others to center communities in their work. Results indicated that while DEAI was considered a high priority, strategies were limited. A positive relationship was found between the number of strategies used and perceived success. ISIs' stories of collaboration focused most often on transactional relationships with organizational partners. Those working with communities directly collaborated in needs-based or reciprocal ways. Results are interpreted in relation to the CCLI Framework's potential to provide benchmarks for both individual institutions and groups like our statewide grants program to use as comparison points for their own DEAI practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10791,"journal":{"name":"Curator: The Museum Journal","volume":"67 3","pages":"617-637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curator: The Museum Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cura.12621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on the diversity, equity, access, and inclusion (DEAI) practices of informal science institutions (ISI) that are part of a statewide grants program. Data were collected to understand how ISIs interpret and implement DEAI in thought and action in their efforts to create more welcoming spaces for members of communities that are often underrepresented or marginalized in informal learning spaces. Modeled after the Cultural Competence Learning Institute's (CCLI) Framework, survey data were collected to understand DEAI practices being used to create welcoming environments. Interview data were collected 2 years later to understand how ISIs collaborate with others to center communities in their work. Results indicated that while DEAI was considered a high priority, strategies were limited. A positive relationship was found between the number of strategies used and perceived success. ISIs' stories of collaboration focused most often on transactional relationships with organizational partners. Those working with communities directly collaborated in needs-based or reciprocal ways. Results are interpreted in relation to the CCLI Framework's potential to provide benchmarks for both individual institutions and groups like our statewide grants program to use as comparison points for their own DEAI practice.

成为我们希望看到的变革:在非正规科学机构中创建欢迎环境和中心社区的多样性、公平、准入和包容做法的愿望和初步进展
本研究侧重于非正规科学机构(ISI)的多样性、公平性、准入性和包容性(DEAI)实践,这些机构是全州补助金计划的一部分。收集数据的目的是了解非正规科学机构如何在思想和行动上诠释和实施 DEAI,努力为那些在非正规学习空间中代表性不足或被边缘化的群体成员创造更受欢迎的空间。以文化能力学习研究所(CCLI)的框架为模型,收集了调查数据,以了解用于创建欢迎环境的 DEAI 实践。两年后收集了访谈数据,以了解 ISI 如何与他人合作,在工作中以社区为中心。结果表明,尽管 DEAI 被认为是一个高度优先事项,但战略却很有限。结果发现,所使用策略的数量与所认为的成功之间存在正相关关系。基础设施服务机构的合作故事大多集中在与组织合作伙伴的交易关系上。那些直接与社区合作的机构则以基于需求或互惠的方式开展合作。CCLI 框架可以为单个机构和团体(如我们的全州补助金计划)提供基准,作为其自身 DEAI 实践的比较点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Curator: The Museum Journal
Curator: The Museum Journal HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信