MOLECULAR DETECTION PROTOCOL OF SARS-COV-2 THROUGH SELF-COLLECTED SALIVA SPECIMENS VERSUS NASOPHARYNGEAL SWABS

Q4 Medicine
A. Ghidouche, Sarah Hallouche, D. Ait‐Ali, Lila BOUDRAHEM-HANNOU, Hamid Nouri, S. Tliba, Idir Bitam, A. Amirouche
{"title":"MOLECULAR DETECTION PROTOCOL OF SARS-COV-2 THROUGH SELF-COLLECTED SALIVA SPECIMENS VERSUS NASOPHARYNGEAL SWABS","authors":"A. Ghidouche, Sarah Hallouche, D. Ait‐Ali, Lila BOUDRAHEM-HANNOU, Hamid Nouri, S. Tliba, Idir Bitam, A. Amirouche","doi":"10.21010/ajidv18i2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Various detection methods, based on specific nucleotide sequences of SARS-CoV-2, were rapidly developed and used as emergency laboratory applications. The most common diagnostic method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection is real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Aims: Here, we carried out to assess the sensitivity and specificity of using saliva self-collected from adult and pediatric patients, as a biological sample for RT-PCR diagnosis. Methods: We compared the sensitivity and specificity of RT-qPCR from 85 samples of adult and pediatric patient, including nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and saliva. Results: Our RT-qPCR results provide that saliva samples showed the highest sensitivity followed by a nasopharyngeal swab for symptomatic as well as for asymptomatic adult patients. On the other hand, samples from symptomatic patients showed a higher sensitivity as compared to asymptomatic patients, while a cycle threshold (Ct) value exhibited a higher sensitivity as compared to higher Ct value. Together, including symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, the overall agreement between the saliva sample and the nasopharyngeal is about 84%. Conclusion: The sensitivity of saliva samples remains acceptable; it may still be a viable option in locations where laboratory facilities are lacking for diagnostic purposes in the early phase of the disease.","PeriodicalId":39108,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"31 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21010/ajidv18i2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Various detection methods, based on specific nucleotide sequences of SARS-CoV-2, were rapidly developed and used as emergency laboratory applications. The most common diagnostic method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection is real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Aims: Here, we carried out to assess the sensitivity and specificity of using saliva self-collected from adult and pediatric patients, as a biological sample for RT-PCR diagnosis. Methods: We compared the sensitivity and specificity of RT-qPCR from 85 samples of adult and pediatric patient, including nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and saliva. Results: Our RT-qPCR results provide that saliva samples showed the highest sensitivity followed by a nasopharyngeal swab for symptomatic as well as for asymptomatic adult patients. On the other hand, samples from symptomatic patients showed a higher sensitivity as compared to asymptomatic patients, while a cycle threshold (Ct) value exhibited a higher sensitivity as compared to higher Ct value. Together, including symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects, the overall agreement between the saliva sample and the nasopharyngeal is about 84%. Conclusion: The sensitivity of saliva samples remains acceptable; it may still be a viable option in locations where laboratory facilities are lacking for diagnostic purposes in the early phase of the disease.
通过自取唾液标本和鼻咽拭子进行 SARS-COV-2 分子检测的方案
背景:以 SARS-CoV-2 的特异核苷酸序列为基础的各种检测方法被迅速开发出来,并在实验室紧急应用。检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染最常用的诊断方法是实时定量反转录聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)。目的:在此,我们评估了使用成人和儿童患者自取唾液作为 RT-PCR 诊断生物样本的灵敏度和特异性。方法我们比较了 85 份成人和儿童患者样本(包括鼻咽拭子(NPS)和唾液)中 RT-qPCR 的灵敏度和特异性。结果我们的 RT-qPCR 结果表明,对于有症状和无症状的成人患者,唾液样本的灵敏度最高,其次是鼻咽拭子。另一方面,与无症状患者相比,有症状患者的样本显示出更高的灵敏度,而与较高的 Ct 值相比,周期阈值 (Ct) 值显示出更高的灵敏度。包括有症状和无症状的受试者在内,唾液样本与鼻咽样本的总体一致性约为 84%。结论唾液样本的灵敏度仍然是可以接受的;在缺乏实验室设施的地方,唾液样本可能仍然是疾病早期诊断的一个可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Infectious Diseases
African Journal of Infectious Diseases Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信