{"title":"CLASS AND CLASS CONSCIOUSNESS ACCORDING TO E. P. THOMPSON","authors":"Daniel Cunningham","doi":"10.1111/hith.12343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article, I extract a theory of class from E. P. Thompson's historical works of the 1960s and 1970s, focusing especially on his 1963 magnum opus <i>The Making of the English Working Class</i>, the articles later collected in the 1991 volume <i>Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture</i>, and the essays “The Peculiarities of the English” and “Eighteenth-Century English Society: Class Struggle without Class?” In the first section, I argue, following Ellen Meiksins Wood, that Thompson developed a genuinely historical materialist theory of class formation as a “structured process” that moves from class struggle to class consciousness, a theory that complicates the frequent description of Thompson as a “voluntarist.” In the second section, I take a more critical position toward Thompson's understanding of class, discussing a tension between this notion of class as structured process and his numerous invocations of class as a form of “lived experience” whose diversity and unpredictability exceed theorization. This tension aside, Thompson claims that, in the case of the nineteenth-century English working class, to which he dedicated so much research, lived experience coincided with the more general structured process he posits. In the third section, therefore, I more fully elaborate on this specific process of class formation as Thompson portrays it, identifying and discussing three intertwined threads: (1) a movement from a past-oriented defense of traditional institutions to a future-oriented demand for reforms, (2) the development of oppositional, class-specific pedagogical institutions and practices, and (3) the creation of a distinct class culture (which Thompson closely aligns with the achievement of class consciousness) that is aware both of itself and of its antagonism with other classes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47473,"journal":{"name":"History and Theory","volume":"63 2","pages":"219-239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hith.12343","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hith.12343","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, I extract a theory of class from E. P. Thompson's historical works of the 1960s and 1970s, focusing especially on his 1963 magnum opus The Making of the English Working Class, the articles later collected in the 1991 volume Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture, and the essays “The Peculiarities of the English” and “Eighteenth-Century English Society: Class Struggle without Class?” In the first section, I argue, following Ellen Meiksins Wood, that Thompson developed a genuinely historical materialist theory of class formation as a “structured process” that moves from class struggle to class consciousness, a theory that complicates the frequent description of Thompson as a “voluntarist.” In the second section, I take a more critical position toward Thompson's understanding of class, discussing a tension between this notion of class as structured process and his numerous invocations of class as a form of “lived experience” whose diversity and unpredictability exceed theorization. This tension aside, Thompson claims that, in the case of the nineteenth-century English working class, to which he dedicated so much research, lived experience coincided with the more general structured process he posits. In the third section, therefore, I more fully elaborate on this specific process of class formation as Thompson portrays it, identifying and discussing three intertwined threads: (1) a movement from a past-oriented defense of traditional institutions to a future-oriented demand for reforms, (2) the development of oppositional, class-specific pedagogical institutions and practices, and (3) the creation of a distinct class culture (which Thompson closely aligns with the achievement of class consciousness) that is aware both of itself and of its antagonism with other classes.
在本文中,我从汤普森(E. P. Thompson)20 世纪 60 和 70 年代的历史著作中提炼出一种阶级理论,尤其侧重于他 1963 年的巨著《英国工人阶级的形成》(The Making of the English Working Class)、后来收录在 1991 年出版的《共同习俗:传统大众文化研究》(Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture)一书中的文章,以及 "英国人的特殊性"(The Peculiarities of the English)和 "18 世纪英国社会"(Eighteenth-Century English Society)两篇论文:没有阶级的阶级斗争?在第一部分中,我追随埃伦-梅克辛斯-伍德(Ellen Meiksins Wood),认为汤普森提出了真正的历史唯物主义理论,即阶级的形成是一个从阶级斗争到阶级意识的 "结构化过程",这一理论使人们经常将汤普森描述为 "唯意志论者 "的说法变得复杂起来。在第二部分,我对汤普森对阶级的理解采取了更为批判性的立场,讨论了阶级作为结构化过程的概念与他多次援引阶级作为 "生活经验 "的形式之间的紧张关系,后者的多样性和不可预测性超出了理论化的范畴。撇开这种紧张关系不谈,汤普森声称,就他潜心研究的十九世纪英国工人阶级而言,生活经验与他所假设的更为普遍的结构化过程不谋而合。因此,在第三部分中,我将更全面地阐述汤普森所描绘的这一阶级形成的具体过程,确定并讨论三条相互交织的线索:(1) 从以过去为导向的对传统制度的捍卫到以未来为导向的改革要求的转变,(2) 对立的、阶级特定的教学机构和实践的发展,(3) 一种独特的阶级文化的产生(汤普森将其与阶级意识的实现紧密联系在一起),这种文化既意识到自身的存在,也意识到与其他阶级的对立。
期刊介绍:
History and Theory leads the way in exploring the nature of history. Prominent international thinkers contribute their reflections in the following areas: critical philosophy of history, speculative philosophy of history, historiography, history of historiography, historical methodology, critical theory, and time and culture. Related disciplines are also covered within the journal, including interactions between history and the natural and social sciences, the humanities, and psychology.