Median pelisäännöt. Sananvapauden toteutuminen oikeustapausten ja toimitustyön eettisyyttä arvioivien Julkisen sanan neuvoston ratkaisujen pohjalta

Heikki Kuutti
{"title":"Median pelisäännöt. Sananvapauden toteutuminen oikeustapausten\nja toimitustyön eettisyyttä arvioivien Julkisen\nsanan neuvoston ratkaisujen pohjalta","authors":"Heikki Kuutti","doi":"10.17011/jyureports/2024/37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The online publication examines the implementation of freedom of speech and the requirements set for editorial work based on selected legal cases and the decisions of Council for Mass Media in Finland, which evaluates the ethics of journalism. The presentation aims to identify and illustrate\" the problem areas of journalistic work by connecting the discussed case examples as part of the chronological editorial work process. Presentation starts from the external starting points of journalism (Journalism's operating environment), the general rights related to freedom of speech and access to information (The public's relationship with the media) and the journalistic decision-making power and independence of newsrooms, where we also look at possible abuses of media power (Journalism's credibility). The chapters following these parts deal with the time-sequenced practices of editorial work (Information acquisition, Story implementation, Publishing, and Follow-up journalistic activities).\n\"Efforts have been made to follow selected legal cases until their final, legally binding decisions\" Some of the cases have been resolved in the national district court, court of appeal or supreme court proceedings, but some of these have progressed to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights, which interprets freedom of speech. The examples also include non-accusation settlements regarding the use of freedom of speech.\n\nIn the cases decided by the Council for Mass Media in Finland, features assessed as both unethical and meeting ethical requirements have been dealt with. In the examples, ethical interpretation of the considered part of the solution has been described, but the exempt-condemnatory marking that characterizes the conclusion as a whole has been removed.\nThe publication is based on the author's lecture courses on legal standards and ethics of journalism at the University of Jyväskylä and its partner institutions.","PeriodicalId":359109,"journal":{"name":"JYU Reports","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JYU Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17011/jyureports/2024/37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The online publication examines the implementation of freedom of speech and the requirements set for editorial work based on selected legal cases and the decisions of Council for Mass Media in Finland, which evaluates the ethics of journalism. The presentation aims to identify and illustrate" the problem areas of journalistic work by connecting the discussed case examples as part of the chronological editorial work process. Presentation starts from the external starting points of journalism (Journalism's operating environment), the general rights related to freedom of speech and access to information (The public's relationship with the media) and the journalistic decision-making power and independence of newsrooms, where we also look at possible abuses of media power (Journalism's credibility). The chapters following these parts deal with the time-sequenced practices of editorial work (Information acquisition, Story implementation, Publishing, and Follow-up journalistic activities). "Efforts have been made to follow selected legal cases until their final, legally binding decisions" Some of the cases have been resolved in the national district court, court of appeal or supreme court proceedings, but some of these have progressed to the decision of the European Court of Human Rights, which interprets freedom of speech. The examples also include non-accusation settlements regarding the use of freedom of speech. In the cases decided by the Council for Mass Media in Finland, features assessed as both unethical and meeting ethical requirements have been dealt with. In the examples, ethical interpretation of the considered part of the solution has been described, but the exempt-condemnatory marking that characterizes the conclusion as a whole has been removed. The publication is based on the author's lecture courses on legal standards and ethics of journalism at the University of Jyväskylä and its partner institutions.
媒体游戏规则。从法庭案例和公共政策委员会关于编辑工作伦理的决定看表达自由
该在线出版物根据选定的法律案例和芬兰大众传媒委员会的决定,审查了言论自由的落实情况和对编辑工作的要求,该委员会负责评估新闻伦理。演讲的目的是通过将所讨论的案例作为按时间顺序排列的编辑工作过程的一部分进行连接,"确定并说明 "新闻工作的问题领域。介绍从新闻业的外部起点(新闻业的运作环境)、与言论自由和获取信息相关的一般权利(公众与媒体的关系)以及新闻决策权和新闻编辑室的独立性开始,我们还探讨了可能滥用媒体权力的问题(新闻业的公信力)。这些部分之后的章节涉及编辑工作的时间顺序实践(信息获取、报道实施、出版和后续新闻活动)。"我们努力跟踪选定的法律案件,直至做出具有法律约束力的最终裁决",其中一些案件已在国家地区法院、上诉法院或最高法院诉讼程序中得到解决,但其中一些案件已发展到解释言论自由的欧洲人权法院的裁决。在芬兰大众传媒理事会裁决的案件中,既有被评估为不道德的,也有符合道德要求的。在这些案例中,对解决方案中被视为不道德的部分进行了道德解释,但删除了作为整个结论特征的免责-谴责标记。该出版物基于作者在于韦斯屈莱大学及其合作机构讲授的新闻法律标准和道德课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信