Dual channel sales in supply chain: live streaming or traditional e-commerce

Xuejun Zhou, Zhibing Liu, Jie Liu, Chen Pan
{"title":"Dual channel sales in supply chain: live streaming or traditional e-commerce","authors":"Xuejun Zhou, Zhibing Liu, Jie Liu, Chen Pan","doi":"10.1051/ro/2024066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, live streaming is becoming a popular channel to sell products all over the world. Compared to traditional e-commerce channel, live streaming channel may not only bring consumers more shopping convenience, but also pose consumers more privacy concern. This paper considers a supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and an e-tailer who sells through dual channels (i.e., live streaming and traditional e-commerce) to explore how shopping convenience and privacy concern affect the optimal decisions. We build game models of two pricing (exogenous and endogenous) and two incentive contracts (wholesale price and two-part tariff).\nWe find that the optimal promotion efforts are decreasing in shopping convenience while increasing in privacy concerns under the wholesale price contract, and independent of them under the two-part tariff contract when pricing is not a decision (such as iPhone); the optimal promotion efforts are increasing in shopping convenience while decreasing in privacy concern when pricing is a decision (such as the seasonal products). Whether the retail pricing is a decision or not, supply chain coordination can be achieved by the two-part tariff contract, but not through the wholesale price contract. Further, the two-part tariff contract is more favorable to the manufacturer if the exogenously given retail price is low, and the wholesale price contract is more favorable to the manufacturer if the retail price is high; the two-part tariff contract is always more beneficial for the supply chain than the wholesale price contract. Finally, we extend our analysis to relax a more realistic form with a variable effort elasticity and verify the robustness of the theoretical results.","PeriodicalId":506995,"journal":{"name":"RAIRO - Operations Research","volume":"42 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAIRO - Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2024066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, live streaming is becoming a popular channel to sell products all over the world. Compared to traditional e-commerce channel, live streaming channel may not only bring consumers more shopping convenience, but also pose consumers more privacy concern. This paper considers a supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and an e-tailer who sells through dual channels (i.e., live streaming and traditional e-commerce) to explore how shopping convenience and privacy concern affect the optimal decisions. We build game models of two pricing (exogenous and endogenous) and two incentive contracts (wholesale price and two-part tariff). We find that the optimal promotion efforts are decreasing in shopping convenience while increasing in privacy concerns under the wholesale price contract, and independent of them under the two-part tariff contract when pricing is not a decision (such as iPhone); the optimal promotion efforts are increasing in shopping convenience while decreasing in privacy concern when pricing is a decision (such as the seasonal products). Whether the retail pricing is a decision or not, supply chain coordination can be achieved by the two-part tariff contract, but not through the wholesale price contract. Further, the two-part tariff contract is more favorable to the manufacturer if the exogenously given retail price is low, and the wholesale price contract is more favorable to the manufacturer if the retail price is high; the two-part tariff contract is always more beneficial for the supply chain than the wholesale price contract. Finally, we extend our analysis to relax a more realistic form with a variable effort elasticity and verify the robustness of the theoretical results.
供应链中的双渠道销售:直播还是传统电子商务
近年来,直播正在成为世界各地销售产品的热门渠道。与传统电子商务渠道相比,直播渠道不仅会给消费者带来更多购物便利,也会给消费者带来更多隐私方面的担忧。本文考虑了一个由制造商和网络零售商组成的供应链,该供应链通过双渠道(即直播和传统电子商务)进行销售,以探讨购物便利性和隐私顾虑如何影响最优决策。我们建立了两种定价(外生性和内生性)和两种激励合约(批发价和两部分关税)的博弈模型。我们发现,在批发价合约下,最优促销力度在购物便利性上递减,而在隐私关注度上递增,而在两部分关税合约下,当定价不是决定因素时(如 iPhone),最优促销力度与购物便利性无关;当定价是决定因素时(如季节性产品),最优促销力度在购物便利性上递增,而在隐私关注度上递减。无论零售定价是否是决定性的,供应链协调都可以通过两部分关税合同来实现,但不能通过批发价格合同来实现。此外,如果外生给定的零售价格较低,两部分关税合同对制造商更有利;如果零售价格较高,批发价格合同对制造商更有利;两部分关税合同总是比批发价格合同更有利于供应链。最后,我们将分析扩展到更现实的可变努力弹性形式,并验证了理论结果的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信