A qualitative analysis and evaluation of social support received after experiencing a broken marriage engagement and impacts on holistic health

Wendy Riemann
{"title":"A qualitative analysis and evaluation of social support received after experiencing a broken marriage engagement and impacts on holistic health","authors":"Wendy Riemann","doi":"10.4081/qrmh.2024.11603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study provides new insights into the role of social sup- port in the largely unexplored field of broken marriage engage- ments and an individual’s wellbeing. The study extends the optimal matching theory (OMT) and the research surrounding helpful, unhelpful, and mixed social support. It uses constant comparison to examine the social support messages individuals received after telling others their engagement ended, as de- scribed in 43, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Six types of helpful support messengers, six types of unhelpful support mes- sengers, and four mixed messenger types were found. Receiver- centric messengers were found to be more helpful than messengers who centered on their own feelings and needs, sometimes to the detriment of the receiver’s own wellbeing. Being present, thoughtful, and intentional with words, can have a positive impact on a person’s holistic health, regardless of whether the relationship is a weak-tie or strong-tie. Using study findings, the broken engagement message stoplight is proposed, detailing messages that are generally helpful to a person’s over- all wellbeing, messages that should likely be avoided, and mes- sages that should be said cautiously when interacting with someone experiencing a broken engagement.","PeriodicalId":375726,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2024.11603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides new insights into the role of social sup- port in the largely unexplored field of broken marriage engage- ments and an individual’s wellbeing. The study extends the optimal matching theory (OMT) and the research surrounding helpful, unhelpful, and mixed social support. It uses constant comparison to examine the social support messages individuals received after telling others their engagement ended, as de- scribed in 43, in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Six types of helpful support messengers, six types of unhelpful support mes- sengers, and four mixed messenger types were found. Receiver- centric messengers were found to be more helpful than messengers who centered on their own feelings and needs, sometimes to the detriment of the receiver’s own wellbeing. Being present, thoughtful, and intentional with words, can have a positive impact on a person’s holistic health, regardless of whether the relationship is a weak-tie or strong-tie. Using study findings, the broken engagement message stoplight is proposed, detailing messages that are generally helpful to a person’s over- all wellbeing, messages that should likely be avoided, and mes- sages that should be said cautiously when interacting with someone experiencing a broken engagement.
对经历婚姻破裂后获得的社会支持及其对整体健康影响的定性分析和评估
本研究为社会支持在破碎婚姻关系中的作用以及个人福祉提供了新的见解。本研究扩展了最优匹配理论(OMT)以及围绕有益、无益和混合社会支持的研究。该研究采用恒定比较法,通过 43 个深入的半结构化访谈,考察了个人在告诉他人其婚约结束后所收到的社会支持信息。研究发现了六种有益的支持信息传递者、六种无益的支持信息传递者和四种混合的信息传递者。研究发现,以受助者为中心的信息传递者比以自己的感受和需求为中心的信息传递者更有帮助,后者有时会损害受助者自身的健康。无论人际关系是弱联系还是强联系,保持在场、体贴和用心说话的态度都会对一个人的整体健康产生积极影响。利用研究结果,我们提出了 "婚约破裂信息红绿灯",详细说明了哪些信息通常有助于一个人的整体健康,哪些信息可能应该避免,哪些信息在与经历婚约破裂的人互动时应该谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信