Where does the EU-path on new genomic techniques lead us?

IF 4.9 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Finja Bohle, Robin Schneider, Juliane Mundorf, Luise Zühl, Samson Simon, Margret Engelhard
{"title":"Where does the EU-path on new genomic techniques lead us?","authors":"Finja Bohle, Robin Schneider, Juliane Mundorf, Luise Zühl, Samson Simon, Margret Engelhard","doi":"10.3389/fgeed.2024.1377117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the European Commission (EC) published a regulatory proposal on plants generated with new genomic techniques (NGTs) (5 July 2023). According to this proposal, NGT plant applications are categorized into category 1 NGT (NGT1) and category 2 NGT (NGT2) based on their molecular characteristics, which diverges from the current legislation centered around Directive 2001/18/EC. To demonstrate where the path of the proposal leads to in practice, we applied the proposed criteria for categorization to a list of NGT plant applications currently in the commercialization pipeline. Combining literature research and a descriptive statistical approach, we can show that 94% of the plant applications affected by the EC proposal, would be classified as NGT1 and thus would receive market approval without risk assessment, monitoring, and sufficient labeling provisions. The remaining 6% of applications would be classified as NGT2 plants, for which, in deviation from the current regulation, an adapted risk assessment is proposed. Screening of the intended traits in the pipeline highlights that certain NGT1 plants can pose similar environmental risks (e.g., invasiveness) to other genetically modified organisms (GMOs), as defined in Directive 2001/18/EC. For example, NGT1 applications based on RNA interference technology can exhibit insecticidal effects with potential side effects on non-target organisms (i.e., other insects). Our quantitative and case-specific elaboration of how the current EC regulatory proposal would affect the environment, health, and consumer protection will be informative for decision-makers and politicians.","PeriodicalId":73086,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in genome editing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in genome editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2024.1377117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, the European Commission (EC) published a regulatory proposal on plants generated with new genomic techniques (NGTs) (5 July 2023). According to this proposal, NGT plant applications are categorized into category 1 NGT (NGT1) and category 2 NGT (NGT2) based on their molecular characteristics, which diverges from the current legislation centered around Directive 2001/18/EC. To demonstrate where the path of the proposal leads to in practice, we applied the proposed criteria for categorization to a list of NGT plant applications currently in the commercialization pipeline. Combining literature research and a descriptive statistical approach, we can show that 94% of the plant applications affected by the EC proposal, would be classified as NGT1 and thus would receive market approval without risk assessment, monitoring, and sufficient labeling provisions. The remaining 6% of applications would be classified as NGT2 plants, for which, in deviation from the current regulation, an adapted risk assessment is proposed. Screening of the intended traits in the pipeline highlights that certain NGT1 plants can pose similar environmental risks (e.g., invasiveness) to other genetically modified organisms (GMOs), as defined in Directive 2001/18/EC. For example, NGT1 applications based on RNA interference technology can exhibit insecticidal effects with potential side effects on non-target organisms (i.e., other insects). Our quantitative and case-specific elaboration of how the current EC regulatory proposal would affect the environment, health, and consumer protection will be informative for decision-makers and politicians.
欧盟的基因组新技术之路将把我们引向何方?
最近,欧盟委员会(EC)发布了一份关于利用新基因组技术(NGT)培育植物的监管提案(2023 年 7 月 5 日)。根据该提案,NGT 植物应用将根据其分子特征分为第 1 类 NGT(NGT1)和第 2 类 NGT(NGT2),这与当前以第 2001/18/EC 号指令为中心的立法有所不同。为了证明该提案在实践中的应用前景,我们将建议的分类标准应用于目前处于商业化进程中的 NGT 植物应用清单。结合文献研究和描述性统计方法,我们可以看出,受欧盟委员会提案影响的植物应用中,94% 将被归类为 NGT1,从而在没有风险评估、监测和充分标签规定的情况下获得市场批准。其余 6% 的申请将被归类为 NGT2 植物,与现行法规不同,建议对其进行调整后的风险评估。对管道中的预期性状进行筛选后发现,某些 NGT1 植物可能会带来与其他转基因生物(GMO)类似的环境风险(如入侵性),正如第 2001/18/EC 号指令所定义的那样。例如,基于 RNA 干扰技术的 NGT1 应用可表现出杀虫效果,并对非目标生物(即其他昆虫)产生潜在的副作用。我们对当前欧盟委员会的监管提案将如何影响环境、健康和消费者保护进行了定量和针对具体案例的阐述,这将为决策者和政治家提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信