The functioning of phraseological units in texts of court decisions in criminal cases (on the material of the German language)

O. V. Petryanina, Elena Vladimirovna Revina
{"title":"The functioning of phraseological units in texts of court decisions in criminal cases (on the material of the German language)","authors":"O. V. Petryanina, Elena Vladimirovna Revina","doi":"10.30853/phil20240109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is dedicated to the study of phraseological units in texts of court decisions in criminal cases within the German legal system. The research objective is to identify legal phraseological units that repeatedly appear in a fixed form in the analyzed legal documents and hold a specialized meaning in terms of professional language. The authors distinguish types of fixed expressions and clichés, organizing them based on their usage in various structural parts of court decisions. The research novelty lies in the first examination of the characteristics of phraseological language tools in the sphere of legal practice based on German court decisions, shedding light on issues related not only to the construction of court decision texts but also to the influence of the content of structural elements on significant text characteristics of legal documents. The analysis revealed a specific set of professionally marked phraseological units regularly present in the examined texts. It was also found that such linguistic clichés act as distinct markers of the compositional organization of court decisions, representing the thematic content of corresponding sections (headings and thematic blocks), predominantly presented either as multi-word terms or as functional verbal constructions and collocations.","PeriodicalId":508324,"journal":{"name":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","volume":"9 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philology. Issues of Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is dedicated to the study of phraseological units in texts of court decisions in criminal cases within the German legal system. The research objective is to identify legal phraseological units that repeatedly appear in a fixed form in the analyzed legal documents and hold a specialized meaning in terms of professional language. The authors distinguish types of fixed expressions and clichés, organizing them based on their usage in various structural parts of court decisions. The research novelty lies in the first examination of the characteristics of phraseological language tools in the sphere of legal practice based on German court decisions, shedding light on issues related not only to the construction of court decision texts but also to the influence of the content of structural elements on significant text characteristics of legal documents. The analysis revealed a specific set of professionally marked phraseological units regularly present in the examined texts. It was also found that such linguistic clichés act as distinct markers of the compositional organization of court decisions, representing the thematic content of corresponding sections (headings and thematic blocks), predominantly presented either as multi-word terms or as functional verbal constructions and collocations.
刑事案件法院判决文本中短语单位的作用(以德语为材料)
本文致力于研究德国法律体系中刑事案件法院判决文本中的短语单位。研究目的是找出在所分析的法律文件中以固定形式反复出现并具有专业语言意义的法律用语单位。作者区分了固定表达和陈词滥调的类型,并根据它们在法院判决书各结构部分中的用法对其进行了整理。研究的新颖之处在于首次以德国法院判决为基础,对法律实践领域的短语语言工具的特点进行了研究,不仅揭示了与法院判决文本的构建有关的问题,还揭示了结构要素的内容对法律文件重要文本特征的影响。分析结果表明,在所研究的文本中经常出现一组特定的具有专业标记的短语单位。分析还发现,这些语言陈词滥调是法院判决书构成组织的独特标记,代表了相应章节(标题和主题块)的主题内容,主要以多词术语或功能性动词结构和搭配的形式出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信