Rethinking heritage for sustainable development By Sophia Labadi, London: UCL Press. 2022. 256 pages. $45 (paperback). ISBN: 9781800081932; $0 (ebook). ISBN: 9781800081925

IF 0.7 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
Christopher Hernandez
{"title":"Rethinking heritage for sustainable development By Sophia Labadi, London: UCL Press. 2022. 256 pages. $45 (paperback). ISBN: 9781800081932; $0 (ebook). ISBN: 9781800081925","authors":"Christopher Hernandez","doi":"10.1111/muan.12287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sophia Labadi begins her book by asking us to consider why of the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—which include a total of 169 sub-goals—only one (Target 11.4) directly mentions culture and heritage. The singular recognition aims at strengthening “efforts to protect and safeguard the world's cultural and natural heritage…” to create more inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable human settlements (p. 2). Although this aim is worthwhile, Labadi draws from her extensive field experience and body of published works to highlight the pitfalls in this approach. Culture, and by extension heritage, are resources for development, though, as she fully demonstrates in the book, ones that need to be considered in greater depth to actually increase well-being for peoples across the globe. Labadi supports her argument by examining how culture and heritage were employed in projects funded as part of the UN Millenium Development Goals Achievement Fund (MDG-F). Each project had varying lengths but took place within a 5-year span (2008–2013). The MDG-F, which included support for “Culture and Development” projects, was established by the Spanish government to help achieve the Millenium Development Goals, which are a precursor to the SDGs. She applies her analytical focus to examine projects in Ethiopia, Mozambique, Namibia, and Senegal. Labadi's aim through the case studies is “to understand whether and how heritage has contributed the three key dimensions of sustainable development (namely poverty reduction, gender equality and environmental sustainability) within the context of its marginalisation from the SDGs and from previous international development agendas” (p. 3).</p><p>The book is organized as a historical and conceptual overview of cultural approaches to development, namely at UNESCO, followed by an analysis of the case studies. After the introduction, Labadi examines, in Chapters 2 and 3, how UNESCO and its partner institution, the World Bank, have historically engaged with culture in their broader development agendas. She begins her discussion in the 1970s with the efforts of postcolonial nations to have their national and cultural sovereignty recognized at the international level. This section concludes by demonstrating how the emphasis on culture for (sustainable) development expanded in the 2000s. Labadi also highlights how the limited attention given to culture or heritage in the SDGs was due, in large part, to political machinations of various parties, including the United States and UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova. Bokova created a crisis during her administration by recognizing Palestine as a member state. As a result, to appease the United States and strengthen her case for becoming UN Secretary General, Bokova, did not motivate UNESCO to lobby for greater inclusion of culture in the SDGs. By the first decade of the new millennium, culture had become a “politicized” term that United States delegates and those from other world powers viewed with suspicion (p. 78).</p><p>Following the historical discussion of the focus on culture in development at UNESCO and the World Bank, Labadi examines the African case studies. In Chapter 4 she outlines the overall methods of her research and provides results, including a discussion of strengths and weaknesses of the selected development projects. One of her major contributions is follow-up ethnographic studies that occurred years after the international development projects ended. Labadi highlights that this type of work is rare, though much needed. The goal of her investigation was to assess whether, and to what extent, the goals of poverty reduction, gender equality, and environmental sustainability had been achieved, as well as the degree to which “culture and heritage” were operationalized by UN partners to achieve them. Labadi found that in each case state-level sponsors and their partners tended to adopt a “do everything” approach that reduced benefits for people on the ground. Moreover, the neocolonial structure of international development led to low national ownership of much of the proposed work, along with the disenfranchisement of locals. Throughout the book, Labadi utilizes the concept of erasure to demonstrate how eurocentrism erases other perspectives pertinent to culture, heritage, development, gender equality and so forth. Still, some positive outcomes were achieved in the four projects she examined.</p><p>In Chapters 5–7, Labadi analyzes the case studies while focusing on a particular development goal. Across her case studies, the use of tangible and intangible heritage in the tourism industry was a predominant theme. Labadi highlights this particularly in Chapter 5, which focuses on the goal of poverty reduction. As is well-documented throughout the world (Gould, <span>2018</span>), state actors have sought to promote economic development by creating tourist attractions. In this vein, many innovative, bottom-up approaches were employed in the projects Labadi analyzed, including a concerted effort to train and collaborate with the people who lived on or near the cultural heritage sites being developed. Via this process of capacity building, some small-scale gains were made, such as tourism operators in Mozambique who felt more empowered to serve as guides, or at the very least, utilize their UNESCO training for advertising purposes. Yet, Labadi is careful to highlight that heritage for tourism projects remain narrow in their focus on attracting foreign, typically Western, visitors, and are fickle in their engagement with the people who live at or near heritage sites.</p><p>Labadi demonstrates how in each of the projects she studied, regardless of which of the UN MDGs they purported to address, tended to fall short of true collaboration. For example, in Chapter 6 she discusses how, at the outset of each project, gender was defined in binary, Eurocentric terms. Consequently, man and woman (or male and female), were considered fixed categories and any local, culturally based understandings of gender identity were erased or excluded. As a result, projects aimed toward increasing gender equality focused on empowering “women.” Even under this Eurocentric framework, Labadi argues that development projects can find avenues for collaboration and promote well-being. For example, a major component of the work in Mozambique was combatting the HIV/AIDS epidemic by opening discussions on intangible heritage, and specifically the practice of widow cleansing, which is known to spread HIV/AIDS due to its reliance on sexual intercourse as a ritual component. Somewhat unique to this case study is that these critical discussions were carried out by locals via their own means, such as radio stations and word-of-mouth. As a result, people living in the Inhambane province of Mozambique decided to alter their practice of widow cleansing by substituting herbs and water for sex as a purifier. By not implementing a patronizing, neocolonial structure to the conversations real change occurred because it was locally driven.</p><p>Despite the success in Mozambique, the top-down structure imposed in each of the development projects Labadi examined generally excluded the voices and perspectives of the people they were supposed to help. For example, capacity building opportunities were set up in Senegal but received limited participation from women. This was due in large part to a lack of acknowledgement of women's other roles in their communities, such as caretaker, which made it difficult for them to attend training events. This lack of engagement with local voices and experiences meant no effort was made to provide labor or financial assistance to offset women's workloads.</p><p>Chapter 7 neatly summarizes how protecting the environment—or what is often simplistically referred to as nature—must be done in tandem with culture. Highlighting that the division between nature and culture is erroneous, Labadi demonstrates how people living in poverty are likely to engage in poaching and deforestation activities if they are the few means available to alleviate their struggle. Yet, she is also careful to argue that approaches to sustainability must be multiscalar. Too often people at the local level are blamed for environmental degradation, which ignores how broader geopolitical and economic forces shape decisions made in Africa and other parts of the globe. This was the case in the Saloum Delta of Senegal. Fishing had long been an important component of culture in this region and national developers considered the growth of artisanal fishing tourism as providing potential economic benefits. Yet, there were concerns that a tourism economy based on fishing could lead to overharvesting. Locals were quick to point out that fish numbers in the region had been dwindling since the onset of industrial fishing practices off the Senegal coast. Most of this harvesting is done by European, Chinese, and other foreign vessels, with about 37% of this work being carried out illegally (p. 180).</p><p>Labadi provides a strong case for how top-down development projects tend to fall short of their stated goals because they impose a neocolonial structure that erases and disenfranchises people at the local level. Consequently, her book is a call for more bottom-up, collaborative approaches to development, which she highlights in the conclusion. The people who live in the places where development projects are implemented should not only be consulted, but must be active partners in these projects. Taking this approach a step further, Labadi's work provides the empirical evidence to substantiate a complete reversal in the modus operandi of international development. Instead of the UN, foreign operators or NGOS, and nation-states controlling development, this process should be driven by and done at the behest of more local groups. Furthermore, as part of building effective heritage and cultural development projects, Labadi argues that combatting eurocentrism (i.e., decolonization) requires an intersectional framework. Race, gender, nationality, and other factors cannot be considered in isolation when attempting to promote well-being. This final point brings the reader back to the SDGs. Why is the general omission of culture and heritage so critical? Not only are they resources for development, but sustainable development must happen in conjunction with them.</p><p>After reading Labadi's book, I only have two critiques that do not necessarily detract from the overall scope of her work. The first is likely an issue with the press in that the color photos on the print version are grainy and not of great quality. However, one can consult the free digital version of the book for high-quality images. The second is Labadi's general lack of engagement with the work of community-based archeologists, many of whom have been implementing and developing the types of bottom-up, collaborative solutions that she calls for at the end of her book (e.g., Atalay, <span>2012</span>; Moshenska, <span>2017</span>; Schmidt, <span>2019</span>; Schmidt &amp; Pikirayi, <span>2016</span>). Again, this omission does not detract from her overall argument but would add to it by making the conclusion sound less aspirational and more grounded in ideas that have been tested in various parts of the world. Nevertheless, Labadi's book is a powerful call for collaborative, intersectional approaches to development that would benefit scholars, UN staff, political officials, nonprofit professionals, and others working in a wide array of development fields.</p>","PeriodicalId":43404,"journal":{"name":"Museum Anthropology","volume":"47 1","pages":"40-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/muan.12287","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Museum Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/muan.12287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sophia Labadi begins her book by asking us to consider why of the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)—which include a total of 169 sub-goals—only one (Target 11.4) directly mentions culture and heritage. The singular recognition aims at strengthening “efforts to protect and safeguard the world's cultural and natural heritage…” to create more inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable human settlements (p. 2). Although this aim is worthwhile, Labadi draws from her extensive field experience and body of published works to highlight the pitfalls in this approach. Culture, and by extension heritage, are resources for development, though, as she fully demonstrates in the book, ones that need to be considered in greater depth to actually increase well-being for peoples across the globe. Labadi supports her argument by examining how culture and heritage were employed in projects funded as part of the UN Millenium Development Goals Achievement Fund (MDG-F). Each project had varying lengths but took place within a 5-year span (2008–2013). The MDG-F, which included support for “Culture and Development” projects, was established by the Spanish government to help achieve the Millenium Development Goals, which are a precursor to the SDGs. She applies her analytical focus to examine projects in Ethiopia, Mozambique, Namibia, and Senegal. Labadi's aim through the case studies is “to understand whether and how heritage has contributed the three key dimensions of sustainable development (namely poverty reduction, gender equality and environmental sustainability) within the context of its marginalisation from the SDGs and from previous international development agendas” (p. 3).

The book is organized as a historical and conceptual overview of cultural approaches to development, namely at UNESCO, followed by an analysis of the case studies. After the introduction, Labadi examines, in Chapters 2 and 3, how UNESCO and its partner institution, the World Bank, have historically engaged with culture in their broader development agendas. She begins her discussion in the 1970s with the efforts of postcolonial nations to have their national and cultural sovereignty recognized at the international level. This section concludes by demonstrating how the emphasis on culture for (sustainable) development expanded in the 2000s. Labadi also highlights how the limited attention given to culture or heritage in the SDGs was due, in large part, to political machinations of various parties, including the United States and UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova. Bokova created a crisis during her administration by recognizing Palestine as a member state. As a result, to appease the United States and strengthen her case for becoming UN Secretary General, Bokova, did not motivate UNESCO to lobby for greater inclusion of culture in the SDGs. By the first decade of the new millennium, culture had become a “politicized” term that United States delegates and those from other world powers viewed with suspicion (p. 78).

Following the historical discussion of the focus on culture in development at UNESCO and the World Bank, Labadi examines the African case studies. In Chapter 4 she outlines the overall methods of her research and provides results, including a discussion of strengths and weaknesses of the selected development projects. One of her major contributions is follow-up ethnographic studies that occurred years after the international development projects ended. Labadi highlights that this type of work is rare, though much needed. The goal of her investigation was to assess whether, and to what extent, the goals of poverty reduction, gender equality, and environmental sustainability had been achieved, as well as the degree to which “culture and heritage” were operationalized by UN partners to achieve them. Labadi found that in each case state-level sponsors and their partners tended to adopt a “do everything” approach that reduced benefits for people on the ground. Moreover, the neocolonial structure of international development led to low national ownership of much of the proposed work, along with the disenfranchisement of locals. Throughout the book, Labadi utilizes the concept of erasure to demonstrate how eurocentrism erases other perspectives pertinent to culture, heritage, development, gender equality and so forth. Still, some positive outcomes were achieved in the four projects she examined.

In Chapters 5–7, Labadi analyzes the case studies while focusing on a particular development goal. Across her case studies, the use of tangible and intangible heritage in the tourism industry was a predominant theme. Labadi highlights this particularly in Chapter 5, which focuses on the goal of poverty reduction. As is well-documented throughout the world (Gould, 2018), state actors have sought to promote economic development by creating tourist attractions. In this vein, many innovative, bottom-up approaches were employed in the projects Labadi analyzed, including a concerted effort to train and collaborate with the people who lived on or near the cultural heritage sites being developed. Via this process of capacity building, some small-scale gains were made, such as tourism operators in Mozambique who felt more empowered to serve as guides, or at the very least, utilize their UNESCO training for advertising purposes. Yet, Labadi is careful to highlight that heritage for tourism projects remain narrow in their focus on attracting foreign, typically Western, visitors, and are fickle in their engagement with the people who live at or near heritage sites.

Labadi demonstrates how in each of the projects she studied, regardless of which of the UN MDGs they purported to address, tended to fall short of true collaboration. For example, in Chapter 6 she discusses how, at the outset of each project, gender was defined in binary, Eurocentric terms. Consequently, man and woman (or male and female), were considered fixed categories and any local, culturally based understandings of gender identity were erased or excluded. As a result, projects aimed toward increasing gender equality focused on empowering “women.” Even under this Eurocentric framework, Labadi argues that development projects can find avenues for collaboration and promote well-being. For example, a major component of the work in Mozambique was combatting the HIV/AIDS epidemic by opening discussions on intangible heritage, and specifically the practice of widow cleansing, which is known to spread HIV/AIDS due to its reliance on sexual intercourse as a ritual component. Somewhat unique to this case study is that these critical discussions were carried out by locals via their own means, such as radio stations and word-of-mouth. As a result, people living in the Inhambane province of Mozambique decided to alter their practice of widow cleansing by substituting herbs and water for sex as a purifier. By not implementing a patronizing, neocolonial structure to the conversations real change occurred because it was locally driven.

Despite the success in Mozambique, the top-down structure imposed in each of the development projects Labadi examined generally excluded the voices and perspectives of the people they were supposed to help. For example, capacity building opportunities were set up in Senegal but received limited participation from women. This was due in large part to a lack of acknowledgement of women's other roles in their communities, such as caretaker, which made it difficult for them to attend training events. This lack of engagement with local voices and experiences meant no effort was made to provide labor or financial assistance to offset women's workloads.

Chapter 7 neatly summarizes how protecting the environment—or what is often simplistically referred to as nature—must be done in tandem with culture. Highlighting that the division between nature and culture is erroneous, Labadi demonstrates how people living in poverty are likely to engage in poaching and deforestation activities if they are the few means available to alleviate their struggle. Yet, she is also careful to argue that approaches to sustainability must be multiscalar. Too often people at the local level are blamed for environmental degradation, which ignores how broader geopolitical and economic forces shape decisions made in Africa and other parts of the globe. This was the case in the Saloum Delta of Senegal. Fishing had long been an important component of culture in this region and national developers considered the growth of artisanal fishing tourism as providing potential economic benefits. Yet, there were concerns that a tourism economy based on fishing could lead to overharvesting. Locals were quick to point out that fish numbers in the region had been dwindling since the onset of industrial fishing practices off the Senegal coast. Most of this harvesting is done by European, Chinese, and other foreign vessels, with about 37% of this work being carried out illegally (p. 180).

Labadi provides a strong case for how top-down development projects tend to fall short of their stated goals because they impose a neocolonial structure that erases and disenfranchises people at the local level. Consequently, her book is a call for more bottom-up, collaborative approaches to development, which she highlights in the conclusion. The people who live in the places where development projects are implemented should not only be consulted, but must be active partners in these projects. Taking this approach a step further, Labadi's work provides the empirical evidence to substantiate a complete reversal in the modus operandi of international development. Instead of the UN, foreign operators or NGOS, and nation-states controlling development, this process should be driven by and done at the behest of more local groups. Furthermore, as part of building effective heritage and cultural development projects, Labadi argues that combatting eurocentrism (i.e., decolonization) requires an intersectional framework. Race, gender, nationality, and other factors cannot be considered in isolation when attempting to promote well-being. This final point brings the reader back to the SDGs. Why is the general omission of culture and heritage so critical? Not only are they resources for development, but sustainable development must happen in conjunction with them.

After reading Labadi's book, I only have two critiques that do not necessarily detract from the overall scope of her work. The first is likely an issue with the press in that the color photos on the print version are grainy and not of great quality. However, one can consult the free digital version of the book for high-quality images. The second is Labadi's general lack of engagement with the work of community-based archeologists, many of whom have been implementing and developing the types of bottom-up, collaborative solutions that she calls for at the end of her book (e.g., Atalay, 2012; Moshenska, 2017; Schmidt, 2019; Schmidt & Pikirayi, 2016). Again, this omission does not detract from her overall argument but would add to it by making the conclusion sound less aspirational and more grounded in ideas that have been tested in various parts of the world. Nevertheless, Labadi's book is a powerful call for collaborative, intersectional approaches to development that would benefit scholars, UN staff, political officials, nonprofit professionals, and others working in a wide array of development fields.

为可持续发展重新思考遗产 SophiaLabadi 著,伦敦:UCL Press.2022.256 页。45美元(平装本)。ISBN:9781800081932;0 美元(电子书)。ISBN: 9781800081925
因此,拉巴迪所分析的项目中采用了许多创新的、自下而上的方法,包括对居住在文化遗址或遗址附近的居民进行培训并与他们合作。通过这种能力建设过程,取得了一些小规模的成果,例如莫桑比克的旅游经营者认为自己更有能力担任导游,或者至少可以利用他们在联合国教科文组织接受的培训进行广告宣传。然而,拉巴迪谨慎地强调,旅游遗产项目的重点仍然是吸引外国游客(通常是西方游客),在与生活在遗产地或遗产地附近的人们接触时,他们的参与是浮躁的。拉巴迪展示了她所研究的每一个项目,无论它们声称要实现联合国千年发展目标中的哪一个目标,往往都无法实现真正的合作。例如,在第 6 章中,她讨论了在每个项目开始时,性别是如何被二元对立的、以欧洲为中心的定义的。因此,男人和女人(或男性和女性)被视为固定的类别,任何基于当地文化的性别认同理解都被抹杀或排除在外。因此,旨在促进性别平等的项目都侧重于增强 "妇女 "的权能。拉巴迪认为,即使在这种以欧洲为中心的框架下,发展项目也可以找到合作和促进福祉的途径。例如,在莫桑比克开展的一项重要工作就是通过讨论非物质遗产,特别是寡妇洁身的习俗来防治艾滋病毒/艾滋病。本案例研究的独特之处在于,这些重要的讨论是由当地人通过自己的方式进行的,如广播电台和口口相传。因此,生活在莫桑比克伊尼扬巴内省的人们决定改变他们的寡妇净化习俗,用草药和水代替性作为净化剂。尽管在莫桑比克取得了成功,但拉巴迪考察过的每个发展项目都采用了自上而下的结构,这通常会排斥本应得到帮助的人们的声音和观点。例如,塞内加尔提供了能力建设机会,但妇女的参与却很有限。这在很大程度上是由于不承认妇女在社区中的其他角色,如看护人,这使得她们很难参加培训活动。第 7 章简明扼要地总结了保护环境(或通常简单地称为自然)必须与文化相结合。拉巴迪强调,将自然与文化割裂开来是错误的,她展示了生活在贫困中的人们是如何从事偷猎和砍伐森林活动的,如果这些活动是缓解他们困境的少数可用手段的话。然而,她也谨慎地指出,可持续发展的方法必须是多领域的。人们常常把环境恶化归咎于当地人,而忽略了更广泛的地缘政治和经济力量是如何影响非洲和全球其他地区的决策的。塞内加尔萨卢姆三角洲的情况就是如此。长期以来,渔业一直是该地区文化的重要组成部分,国家开发商认为手工渔业旅游业的发展可带来潜在的经济效益。然而,人们担心以捕鱼为基础的旅游经济会导致过度捕捞。当地人很快指出,自从塞内加尔沿海开始工业化捕鱼以来,该地区的鱼类数量一直在减少。拉巴迪有力地证明了自上而下的发展项目往往无法实现其既定目标,因为这些项目强加了一种新殖民主义结构,抹杀并剥夺了当地人民的权利。因此,她在书中呼吁采用更多自下而上的合作发展方法,并在结论中强调了这一点。生活在发展项目实施地的人们不仅应该被征求意见,还必须成为这些项目的积极合作伙伴。在此基础上,拉巴迪的研究提供了经验证据,证明国际发展模式的彻底颠覆是有道理的。这一进程不应由联合国、外国运营商或非政府组织以及民族国家来控制,而应由更多的地方团体来推动和完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Museum Anthropology
Museum Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
75.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Museum Anthropology seeks to be a leading voice for scholarly research on the collection, interpretation, and representation of the material world. Through critical articles, provocative commentaries, and thoughtful reviews, this peer-reviewed journal aspires to cultivate vibrant dialogues that reflect the global and transdisciplinary work of museums. Situated at the intersection of practice and theory, Museum Anthropology advances our knowledge of the ways in which material objects are intertwined with living histories of cultural display, economics, socio-politics, law, memory, ethics, colonialism, conservation, and public education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信