Manuscript of Prince Semen Shakhovsky from the collection of the Russian State Library: content analysis

S. A. Volkov, N. A. Tropin
{"title":"Manuscript of Prince Semen Shakhovsky from the collection of the Russian State Library: content analysis","authors":"S. A. Volkov, N. A. Tropin","doi":"10.24888/2410-4205-2024-38-1-71-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article is a brief substantive analysis of the handwritten collection of works by Prince Semen Shakhovskoy. The collection consists of several dozen works of various genres, including historical, hymnographic, religious and philosophical, etc. The relevance of text analysis lies in obtaining a more complete understanding of the development of events of the period under study to which the manuscript belongs, including the Time of Troubles, through the restoration of biography and eyewitness testimony. Materials and methods. The main source of the work was a manuscript dating from 1652 from the collections of the Russian State Library, as well as its alleged copy (F. 173.1 No. 213 and No. 214). When writing the article, the following methods were used: the biographical method gave a clearer understanding of the life path and personality characteristics of Shakhovskoy; the paleographic method allowed to determine the distinctive features of the manuscript itself; the descriptive method allowed to reveal its content and classify the presented works. This classification is proposed for the first time. Results. The author managed to identify 5 types of texts in the collection: prayer, theological, hymnographic, historical and epistolary (epistles). An indication is also made of the preservation of authorship and the formation of a corpus of works for the memory of subsequent generations. This tradition, in many ways, was laid down by Maxim the Greek, references to whose works are in the Shakhovsky manuscript. Conclusion. Prince and voivode Shakhovskoy devoted his whole life to public service, but he gained the main fame thanks to the works that became historical and literary property. The collection under study does not contain all the works of Shakhovskoy known to researchers, but probably those that were of the greatest value to the author.","PeriodicalId":128487,"journal":{"name":"History: facts and symbols","volume":"67 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History: facts and symbols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24888/2410-4205-2024-38-1-71-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article is a brief substantive analysis of the handwritten collection of works by Prince Semen Shakhovskoy. The collection consists of several dozen works of various genres, including historical, hymnographic, religious and philosophical, etc. The relevance of text analysis lies in obtaining a more complete understanding of the development of events of the period under study to which the manuscript belongs, including the Time of Troubles, through the restoration of biography and eyewitness testimony. Materials and methods. The main source of the work was a manuscript dating from 1652 from the collections of the Russian State Library, as well as its alleged copy (F. 173.1 No. 213 and No. 214). When writing the article, the following methods were used: the biographical method gave a clearer understanding of the life path and personality characteristics of Shakhovskoy; the paleographic method allowed to determine the distinctive features of the manuscript itself; the descriptive method allowed to reveal its content and classify the presented works. This classification is proposed for the first time. Results. The author managed to identify 5 types of texts in the collection: prayer, theological, hymnographic, historical and epistolary (epistles). An indication is also made of the preservation of authorship and the formation of a corpus of works for the memory of subsequent generations. This tradition, in many ways, was laid down by Maxim the Greek, references to whose works are in the Shakhovsky manuscript. Conclusion. Prince and voivode Shakhovskoy devoted his whole life to public service, but he gained the main fame thanks to the works that became historical and literary property. The collection under study does not contain all the works of Shakhovskoy known to researchers, but probably those that were of the greatest value to the author.
俄罗斯国立图书馆收藏的塞门-沙霍夫斯基王子手稿:内容分析
导言。本文是对谢苗-沙霍夫斯科伊亲王手写作品集的简要实质性分析。该作品集由几十部不同体裁的作品组成,包括历史、赞美诗、宗教和哲学等。文本分析的意义在于通过还原传记和目击者证词,更全面地了解手稿所属研究时期(包括动乱时期)的事件发展。材料和方法。作品的主要来源是俄罗斯国立图书馆收藏的一份 1652 年的手稿及其据称的副本(F.173.1 No.213 和 No.214)。在撰写这篇文章时,使用了以下方法:通过传记方法更清楚地了解了沙霍夫斯科伊的生活轨迹和个性特征;通过古文字学方法确定了手稿本身的显著特征;通过描述方法揭示了手稿的内容并对所介绍的作品进行了分类。这是首次提出这种分类方法。结果。作者设法确定了手稿集中的五类文本:祈祷文、神学、赞美诗、历史和书信(书信)。作者还指出了对作者身份的保护以及为后代记忆而形成的作品集。这一传统在许多方面是由希腊人马克西姆奠定的,沙霍夫斯基手稿中提到了他的作品。结论。沙霍夫斯科伊亲王和省长毕生致力于公共服务,但他的名声主要归功于成为历史和文学财产的作品。所研究的作品集并不包含研究人员所知的沙霍夫斯科伊的所有作品,但可能包含对作者最有价值的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信