Mind the FemTech gap: regulation failings and exploitative systems

Maryam Mehrnezhad, Thyla Van Der Merwe, Michael Catt
{"title":"Mind the FemTech gap: regulation failings and exploitative systems","authors":"Maryam Mehrnezhad, Thyla Van Der Merwe, Michael Catt","doi":"10.3389/friot.2024.1296599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The security, privacy, and safety issues around Female-oriented technologies (FemTech) and data can lead to differential harms. These complex risks and harms are enabled by many factors including inadequate regulations, the non-compliant practices of the industry, and the lack of research and guidelines for cyber-secure, privacy-preserving, and safe products. In this paper, we review the existing regulations related to FemTech in the United Kingdom, EU, and Switzerland and identify the gaps. We run experiments on a range of FemTech devices and apps and identify several exploitative practices. We advocate for the policymakers to explicitly acknowledge and accommodate the risks of these technologies in the relevant regulations.","PeriodicalId":308773,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in The Internet of Things","volume":"78 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in The Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/friot.2024.1296599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The security, privacy, and safety issues around Female-oriented technologies (FemTech) and data can lead to differential harms. These complex risks and harms are enabled by many factors including inadequate regulations, the non-compliant practices of the industry, and the lack of research and guidelines for cyber-secure, privacy-preserving, and safe products. In this paper, we review the existing regulations related to FemTech in the United Kingdom, EU, and Switzerland and identify the gaps. We run experiments on a range of FemTech devices and apps and identify several exploitative practices. We advocate for the policymakers to explicitly acknowledge and accommodate the risks of these technologies in the relevant regulations.
警惕女性科技差距:监管失灵与剥削制度
围绕面向女性的技术(FemTech)和数据的安全、隐私和保障问题可能会导致不同的伤害。这些复杂的风险和危害是由许多因素造成的,其中包括法规不健全、行业不合规的做法,以及缺乏对网络安全、隐私保护和安全产品的研究和指导。在本文中,我们回顾了英国、欧盟和瑞士与 FemTech 相关的现行法规,并找出其中的差距。我们在一系列 FemTech 设备和应用程序上进行了实验,发现了几种漏洞。我们主张政策制定者在相关法规中明确承认并考虑这些技术的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信