A study on the usefulness of eppikajutsuto for cellulitis

Hajime Nakae, Haruka Hikichi, Hidenori Tanaka
{"title":"A study on the usefulness of eppikajutsuto for cellulitis","authors":"Hajime Nakae, Haruka Hikichi, Hidenori Tanaka","doi":"10.1002/tkm2.1405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cellulitis is a skin and soft‐tissue infection that is primarily treated with antimicrobial therapy, with the assumption that an organism is the causative agent. Eppikajutsuto (EPTJ) is generally used to alleviate inflammatory swelling, pain, and warmth in joints owing to its heat™1‐clearing and fluid™1‐regulating properties. This study is a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of EPTJ in the treatment of cellulitis.A total of 99 patients (48 men and 51 women) treated with EPTJ for cellulitis were recruited. The drug was considered effective when symptoms improved with EPTJ (including concomitant use of Kampo prescriptions) and ineffective when EPTJ was discontinued or changed to another drug. Adverse reactions were also monitored.There were 94 effective and five ineffective cases (efficacy rate, 94.9%). No adverse events were reported. The dosing period of the effective group was found to be significantly longer than that of the ineffective group (p = 0.0221). Antibiotics were used in 48.5% of the cases; however, there was no difference in concomitant antibiotic use between the effective and ineffective groups.EPTJ may be a safe and effective treatment option for cellulitis. Although antimicrobial agents were used in 48.5% of cases, further studies are needed to determine whether the concomitant use of antimicrobial agents is essential or the concomitant use of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs is useful.","PeriodicalId":285316,"journal":{"name":"Traditional & Kampo Medicine","volume":"354 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traditional & Kampo Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tkm2.1405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cellulitis is a skin and soft‐tissue infection that is primarily treated with antimicrobial therapy, with the assumption that an organism is the causative agent. Eppikajutsuto (EPTJ) is generally used to alleviate inflammatory swelling, pain, and warmth in joints owing to its heat™1‐clearing and fluid™1‐regulating properties. This study is a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of EPTJ in the treatment of cellulitis.A total of 99 patients (48 men and 51 women) treated with EPTJ for cellulitis were recruited. The drug was considered effective when symptoms improved with EPTJ (including concomitant use of Kampo prescriptions) and ineffective when EPTJ was discontinued or changed to another drug. Adverse reactions were also monitored.There were 94 effective and five ineffective cases (efficacy rate, 94.9%). No adverse events were reported. The dosing period of the effective group was found to be significantly longer than that of the ineffective group (p = 0.0221). Antibiotics were used in 48.5% of the cases; however, there was no difference in concomitant antibiotic use between the effective and ineffective groups.EPTJ may be a safe and effective treatment option for cellulitis. Although antimicrobial agents were used in 48.5% of cases, further studies are needed to determine whether the concomitant use of antimicrobial agents is essential or the concomitant use of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs is useful.
关于伊皮卡茹图对蜂窝组织炎的作用的研究
蜂窝织炎是一种皮肤和软组织感染,主要通过抗菌疗法进行治疗,假定病原体是一种有机体。Eppikajutsuto(EPTJ)具有清热™1和调节体液™1的特性,通常用于缓解关节炎症性肿胀、疼痛和发热。本研究是对 EPTJ 治疗蜂窝组织炎的疗效和安全性进行的回顾性分析。本研究共招募了 99 名使用 EPTJ 治疗蜂窝组织炎的患者(48 名男性和 51 名女性)。如果使用 EPTJ 后症状有所改善(包括同时使用康普处方),则认为该药物有效;如果停用 EPTJ 或改用其他药物,则认为该药物无效。此外,还对不良反应进行了监测。有效病例 94 例,无效病例 5 例(有效率 94.9%)。无不良反应报告。结果发现,有效组的用药时间明显长于无效组(P = 0.0221)。48.5%的病例使用了抗生素,但有效组和无效组在同时使用抗生素方面没有差异。虽然48.5%的病例使用了抗菌药,但仍需进一步研究,以确定同时使用抗菌药是否必要,或同时使用非甾体抗炎药是否有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信