Comparison between various oral health literacy scales among university students in Jaipur, India

Poonam Jangid, Naganandini Sampath, S. Mahuli, A. V. Mahuli, R. Yadav
{"title":"Comparison between various oral health literacy scales among university students in Jaipur, India","authors":"Poonam Jangid, Naganandini Sampath, S. Mahuli, A. V. Mahuli, R. Yadav","doi":"10.36922/jctr.23.00100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Oral health literacy (OHL) is a multidimensional concept that encompasses reading, writing, speaking, listening, proper decision-making skills, assessment of OHL level, and comparison between scales. Numerous tools are available to measure OHL using a range of indicators.\nAim: The purpose of this study is to compare three OHL scales, namely, Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine and Dentistry-20 (REALMD-20), OHL Adults Questionnaire (OHL-AQ), and Health Literacy in Dentistry (HeLD), among university students in Jaipur, India.\nMethods: A comparative study was conducted among 180 university students from non-medical courses. Students’ literacy was measured using REALMD-20, OHL-AQ, and HeLD. Independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Pearson’s correlation test were used for statistical analysis.\nResults: A weak positive correlation coefficient was obtained between REALMD-20, OHL-AQ, and HeLD. The mean REALMD-20 scores of Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 16.3, 14.98, and 15.8, respectively. For OHL-AQ, the mean scores obtained for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 6.77, 7.50, and 6.58, respectively. The mean HeLD scores in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 104.23, 102.70, and 100.4, respectively. However, the differences between these groups on all three tested scales were not statistically significant.\nConclusion: In the present study, a weak positive correlation was observed between REALMD-20, OHL-AQ, and HeLD, thereby revealing potential shortcomings in each of these tools.\nRelevance for Patients: Encouraging patients to articulate their comprehension of their conditions and instructions enables health-care providers to identify gaps and enhance OHL, leading to effective prevention of oral diseases.","PeriodicalId":15482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Research","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/jctr.23.00100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Oral health literacy (OHL) is a multidimensional concept that encompasses reading, writing, speaking, listening, proper decision-making skills, assessment of OHL level, and comparison between scales. Numerous tools are available to measure OHL using a range of indicators. Aim: The purpose of this study is to compare three OHL scales, namely, Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine and Dentistry-20 (REALMD-20), OHL Adults Questionnaire (OHL-AQ), and Health Literacy in Dentistry (HeLD), among university students in Jaipur, India. Methods: A comparative study was conducted among 180 university students from non-medical courses. Students’ literacy was measured using REALMD-20, OHL-AQ, and HeLD. Independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test, and Pearson’s correlation test were used for statistical analysis. Results: A weak positive correlation coefficient was obtained between REALMD-20, OHL-AQ, and HeLD. The mean REALMD-20 scores of Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 16.3, 14.98, and 15.8, respectively. For OHL-AQ, the mean scores obtained for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 6.77, 7.50, and 6.58, respectively. The mean HeLD scores in Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 104.23, 102.70, and 100.4, respectively. However, the differences between these groups on all three tested scales were not statistically significant. Conclusion: In the present study, a weak positive correlation was observed between REALMD-20, OHL-AQ, and HeLD, thereby revealing potential shortcomings in each of these tools. Relevance for Patients: Encouraging patients to articulate their comprehension of their conditions and instructions enables health-care providers to identify gaps and enhance OHL, leading to effective prevention of oral diseases.
印度斋浦尔大学生各种口腔健康知识量表之间的比较
背景:口腔健康素养(OHL)是一个多维概念,包括读、写、说、听、正确决策技能、OHL水平评估以及量表之间的比较。目的:本研究旨在比较印度斋浦尔大学生的三种口腔健康素养量表,即《医学和牙科成人素养快速评估-20》(REALMD-20)、《口腔健康素养成人问卷》(OHL-AQ)和《牙科健康素养》(HeLD):对 180 名非医学专业的大学生进行了一项比较研究。使用 REALMD-20、OHL-AQ 和 HeLD 测量学生的读写能力。统计分析采用独立样本 t 检验、单因素方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis 检验和皮尔逊相关检验:结果:REALMD-20、OHL-AQ 和 HeLD 之间呈弱正相关系数。第 1 组、第 2 组和第 3 组的 REALMD-20 平均得分分别为 16.3 分、14.98 分和 15.8 分。在 OHL-AQ 方面,第 1、2 和 3 组的平均得分分别为 6.77、7.50 和 6.58。第 1 组、第 2 组和第 3 组的 HeLD 平均得分分别为 104.23 分、102.70 分和 100.4 分。然而,这些组别在所有三个测试量表上的差异均无统计学意义:本研究观察到 REALMD-20、OHL-AQ 和 HeLD 之间存在微弱的正相关性,从而揭示了这些工具各自的潜在缺陷:鼓励患者明确表达他们对自身情况和说明的理解,使医疗服务提供者能够找出差距并提高口腔健康水平,从而有效预防口腔疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信