The Dilemma of Local Democracy in Bali: Two Sides of Power in the Election of Perbekel

Piers Andreas Noak
{"title":"The Dilemma of Local Democracy in Bali: Two Sides of Power in the Election of Perbekel","authors":"Piers Andreas Noak","doi":"10.31506/jog.v9i1.24306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This article discusses the dilemma of selecting perbekel in Bali. There is an opportunity to break down the kinship system among the masses of voters, who are in the two realms of customary and official power. In this position, there is an interest bias. The bet on the mass of voters positions the two in a potential division. This article starts with the basic problem of how the two sides of power work in selecting equipment in Bali. This article departs from an analysis of the institutional rational choice theoretical frame, one of the approaches in political science. This article shows the perceptional aspect related to the potential dilemma of the working of local democracy in Bali, which is considered to include the polarization of power between traditional villages and service villages. This research is descriptive-qualitative in nature and involves conducting interviews with traditional village figures, elites, and government agencies. The results obtained only guarantee electoral accountability. The village dilemma is between two powers: domination power on the one hand and hegemonic power, as well as power relations in building patron-client relationships in the essence of selecting village heads, or perbekel. In reality, the practice of exercising power in villages in their original autonomous capacity is more hegemonic in nature. This condition then allows for such a strong network to exist between residents. On the one hand, psychologically, the development of this network is also colored by calculations of economic interests. It is this calculation of interests that often disrupts relationships between citizens. Both in the capacity of official villages and traditional villages, including the presence of vertical government.","PeriodicalId":503663,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Governance","volume":"22 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v9i1.24306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: This article discusses the dilemma of selecting perbekel in Bali. There is an opportunity to break down the kinship system among the masses of voters, who are in the two realms of customary and official power. In this position, there is an interest bias. The bet on the mass of voters positions the two in a potential division. This article starts with the basic problem of how the two sides of power work in selecting equipment in Bali. This article departs from an analysis of the institutional rational choice theoretical frame, one of the approaches in political science. This article shows the perceptional aspect related to the potential dilemma of the working of local democracy in Bali, which is considered to include the polarization of power between traditional villages and service villages. This research is descriptive-qualitative in nature and involves conducting interviews with traditional village figures, elites, and government agencies. The results obtained only guarantee electoral accountability. The village dilemma is between two powers: domination power on the one hand and hegemonic power, as well as power relations in building patron-client relationships in the essence of selecting village heads, or perbekel. In reality, the practice of exercising power in villages in their original autonomous capacity is more hegemonic in nature. This condition then allows for such a strong network to exist between residents. On the one hand, psychologically, the development of this network is also colored by calculations of economic interests. It is this calculation of interests that often disrupts relationships between citizens. Both in the capacity of official villages and traditional villages, including the presence of vertical government.
巴厘岛地方民主的困境:佩尔贝克选举中的两面权力
:这篇文章讨论了巴厘岛选举 perbekel 的困境。广大选民处于习俗权力和官方权力的两个领域,有机会打破他们之间的亲属制度。在这个立场上,存在着利益偏差。对选民群众的押注,将二者定位在潜在的分裂中。本文从权力双方如何在巴厘岛选择设备这一基本问题入手。本文从政治学方法之一的制度理性选择理论框架分析出发。本文展示了与巴厘岛地方民主运作的潜在困境有关的感知方面,其中包括传统村落和服务村落之间的权力两极分化。本研究为描述-定性研究,包括对传统村落人物、精英和政府机构进行访谈。所获得的结果只能保证选举问责。村庄的困境在于两种权力之间:一方面是统治权力,另一方面是霸权权力,以及在选择村长(或 perbekel)的本质上建立赞助人-客户关系的权力关系。在现实中,村庄以其原有的自治身份行使权力的做法更具有霸权性质。在这种情况下,居民之间便形成了如此强大的关系网。一方面,从心理上讲,这种网络的发展也带有经济利益计算的色彩。正是这种利益算计常常破坏公民之间的关系。无论是官方村落还是传统村落,包括垂直政府的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信