CHALLENGING THE INTERPRETATION OF THE VERSE ON HIJAB BY M. QURAISH SHIHAB: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS REVIEW

Abdul Rohman, Ghazi Abdullah Muttaqien, Faisal Hamad ALMonawer, Tigran Rumanian, Mohammad Deik
{"title":"CHALLENGING THE INTERPRETATION OF THE VERSE ON HIJAB BY M. QURAISH SHIHAB: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS REVIEW","authors":"Abdul Rohman, Ghazi Abdullah Muttaqien, Faisal Hamad ALMonawer, Tigran Rumanian, Mohammad Deik","doi":"10.23917/qist.v3i2.4046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a variety of interpretations regarding the verse on the hijab in the Qur'an. Some commentaries demonstrate strong arguments, while others appear to be subjective and ambiguous. This article examines the thoughts of Quraish Shihab on the hijab verse and critically analyzes them. The research falls under the category of library research, utilizing a descriptive analysis method to explain research findings based on the study's focus with a critical analysis to produce objective results. The approach employed is content analysis. The primary sources for this research are the Tafsir Al-Mishbah and Jilbab Pakaian Wanita Muslimah. The research findings indicate: First, Quraish Shihab argues that wearing the hijab is not obligatory but merely a recommendation and is applicable only in the time of Prophet Muhammad. Scholars also do not agree on the limits of women's modesty, and the rules of the hijab are considered part of Arab cultural traditions, not applicable to other nations that do not wear the hijab. Second, Quraish Shihab's interpretation of the hijab verse lacks strong arguments in the context of Islamic studies. The wording of the command in the hijab verse is still regarded as an obligation and cannot be transformed into a recommendation due to the lack of supporting evidence. Scholars have unanimously agreed on the limits of women's modesty, from the top of the head to the tips of the toes, excluding the face and the palms of the hands. The law of the hijab remains in effect until the end of time, even though it was revealed under specific conditions and in specific regions, as Islam is considered a universal religion.","PeriodicalId":508062,"journal":{"name":"QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies","volume":"26 31","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v3i2.4046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a variety of interpretations regarding the verse on the hijab in the Qur'an. Some commentaries demonstrate strong arguments, while others appear to be subjective and ambiguous. This article examines the thoughts of Quraish Shihab on the hijab verse and critically analyzes them. The research falls under the category of library research, utilizing a descriptive analysis method to explain research findings based on the study's focus with a critical analysis to produce objective results. The approach employed is content analysis. The primary sources for this research are the Tafsir Al-Mishbah and Jilbab Pakaian Wanita Muslimah. The research findings indicate: First, Quraish Shihab argues that wearing the hijab is not obligatory but merely a recommendation and is applicable only in the time of Prophet Muhammad. Scholars also do not agree on the limits of women's modesty, and the rules of the hijab are considered part of Arab cultural traditions, not applicable to other nations that do not wear the hijab. Second, Quraish Shihab's interpretation of the hijab verse lacks strong arguments in the context of Islamic studies. The wording of the command in the hijab verse is still regarded as an obligation and cannot be transformed into a recommendation due to the lack of supporting evidence. Scholars have unanimously agreed on the limits of women's modesty, from the top of the head to the tips of the toes, excluding the face and the palms of the hands. The law of the hijab remains in effect until the end of time, even though it was revealed under specific conditions and in specific regions, as Islam is considered a universal religion.
质疑 M. Quraish Shihab 对《头巾》经文的解释:批判性分析评论古莱什-谢哈布:批判性分析评论
关于《古兰经》中有关头巾的经文有多种解释。一些注释论证有力,而另一些则显得主观且含糊不清。本文研究了古莱什-谢哈布(Quraish Shihab)关于头巾经文的思想,并对其进行了批判性分析。本研究属于图书馆研究范畴,采用描述性分析方法,根据研究重点解释研究结果,并通过批判性分析得出客观结果。采用的方法是内容分析法。本研究的主要资料来源是 Tafsir Al-Mishbah 和 Jilbab Pakaian Wanita Muslimah。研究结果表明首先,Quraish Shihab 认为戴头巾不是强制性的,只是一种建议,只适用于先知穆罕默德时代。学者们也没有就女性谦逊的界限达成一致,头巾的规定被认为是阿拉伯文化传统的一部分,不适用于其他不戴头巾的民族。其次,古莱什-谢哈布对头巾经文的解释缺乏伊斯兰研究方面的有力论据。由于缺乏佐证,头巾经文中的命令措辞仍被视为一种义务,不能转化为建议。学者们一致同意妇女谦逊的界限,即从头顶到脚趾尖,但不包括脸部和手掌。尽管头巾法是在特定条件下和特定地区启示的,但由于伊斯兰教被认为是一种普世宗教,因此头巾法一直有效,直到世界末日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信