Delving into educators’ perspectives on ChatGPT in management education: a qualitative exploration

IF 3.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Preeti Bhaskar, Puneet Kumar Kumar Gupta
{"title":"Delving into educators’ perspectives on ChatGPT in management education: a qualitative exploration","authors":"Preeti Bhaskar, Puneet Kumar Kumar Gupta","doi":"10.1108/itse-08-2023-0169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aims to delve into the perspectives of educators on integrating ChatGPT, an AI language model into management education. In the current research, educators were asked to talk as widely as possible about the perceived benefits, limitations of ChatGPT in management education and strategies to improve ChatGPT for management education. Also, shedding light on what motivates or inhibits them to use ChatGPT in management education in the Indian context.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nInterpretative phenomenological analysis commonly uses purposive sampling. In this research, the purpose is to delve into educators’ perspectives on ChatGPT in management education. The data was collected from the universities offering management education in Uttarakhand, India. The final sample size for the study was constrained to 57 educators, reflecting the point of theoretical saturation in data collection.\n\nFindings\nThe present study involved educators discussing the various advantages of using ChatGPT in the context of management education. When educators were interviewed, their responses were categorized into nine distinct sub-themes related to the benefits of ChatGPT in management education. Similarly, when educators were asked to provide their insights on the limitations of using ChatGPT in management education, their responses were grouped into six sub-themes that emerged during the interviews. Furthermore, in the process of interviewing educators about potential strategies to enhance ChatGPT for management education, their feedback was organized into seven sub-themes, reflecting the various approaches suggested by the educators.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nIn the qualitative study, perceptions and experiences of educators at a certain period are captured. It would be necessary to conduct longitudinal research to comprehend how perceptions and experiences might change over time. The study’s exclusive focus on management education may not adequately reflect the experiences and viewpoints of educators in another discipline. The findings may not be generalizable and applicable to other educational disciplines.\n\nPractical implications\nThe research has helped in identifying the strengths and limitations of ChatGPT as perceived by educators for management education. Understanding educators’ perceptions and experiences with ChatGPT provided valuable insight into how the tool is being used in real-world educational settings. These insights can guide higher education institutions, policymakers and ChatGPT service providers in refining and improving the ChatGPT tool to better align with the specific needs of management educators.\n\nOriginality/value\nAmid the rising interest in ChatGPT’s educational applications, a research gap exists in exploring educators’ perspectives on AI tools like ChatGPT. While some studies have addressed its role in fields like medical, engineering, legal education and natural sciences, the context of management education remains underexplored. This study focuses on educators’ experiences with ChatGPT in transforming management education, aiming to reveal its benefits, limitations and factors influencing adoption. As research in this area is limited, educators’ insights can guide higher education institutions, ChatGPT providers and policymakers in effectively implementing ChatGPT in Indian management education.\n","PeriodicalId":44954,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Technology and Smart Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Technology and Smart Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-08-2023-0169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to delve into the perspectives of educators on integrating ChatGPT, an AI language model into management education. In the current research, educators were asked to talk as widely as possible about the perceived benefits, limitations of ChatGPT in management education and strategies to improve ChatGPT for management education. Also, shedding light on what motivates or inhibits them to use ChatGPT in management education in the Indian context. Design/methodology/approach Interpretative phenomenological analysis commonly uses purposive sampling. In this research, the purpose is to delve into educators’ perspectives on ChatGPT in management education. The data was collected from the universities offering management education in Uttarakhand, India. The final sample size for the study was constrained to 57 educators, reflecting the point of theoretical saturation in data collection. Findings The present study involved educators discussing the various advantages of using ChatGPT in the context of management education. When educators were interviewed, their responses were categorized into nine distinct sub-themes related to the benefits of ChatGPT in management education. Similarly, when educators were asked to provide their insights on the limitations of using ChatGPT in management education, their responses were grouped into six sub-themes that emerged during the interviews. Furthermore, in the process of interviewing educators about potential strategies to enhance ChatGPT for management education, their feedback was organized into seven sub-themes, reflecting the various approaches suggested by the educators. Research limitations/implications In the qualitative study, perceptions and experiences of educators at a certain period are captured. It would be necessary to conduct longitudinal research to comprehend how perceptions and experiences might change over time. The study’s exclusive focus on management education may not adequately reflect the experiences and viewpoints of educators in another discipline. The findings may not be generalizable and applicable to other educational disciplines. Practical implications The research has helped in identifying the strengths and limitations of ChatGPT as perceived by educators for management education. Understanding educators’ perceptions and experiences with ChatGPT provided valuable insight into how the tool is being used in real-world educational settings. These insights can guide higher education institutions, policymakers and ChatGPT service providers in refining and improving the ChatGPT tool to better align with the specific needs of management educators. Originality/value Amid the rising interest in ChatGPT’s educational applications, a research gap exists in exploring educators’ perspectives on AI tools like ChatGPT. While some studies have addressed its role in fields like medical, engineering, legal education and natural sciences, the context of management education remains underexplored. This study focuses on educators’ experiences with ChatGPT in transforming management education, aiming to reveal its benefits, limitations and factors influencing adoption. As research in this area is limited, educators’ insights can guide higher education institutions, ChatGPT providers and policymakers in effectively implementing ChatGPT in Indian management education.
深入了解教育工作者对管理教育中 ChatGPT 的看法:定性探索
目的 本研究旨在深入探讨教育工作者对将人工智能语言模型 ChatGPT 融入管理教育的看法。在当前的研究中,教育工作者被要求尽可能广泛地谈论他们认为 ChatGPT 在管理教育中的益处、局限性以及改进 ChatGPT 在管理教育中的应用的策略。设计/方法/途径解释性现象学分析通常使用目的性抽样。在本研究中,目的是深入了解教育工作者对管理教育中 ChatGPT 的看法。数据是从印度北阿坎德邦提供管理教育的大学中收集的。研究结果本研究涉及教育工作者讨论在管理教育中使用 ChatGPT 的各种优势。在对教育工作者进行访谈时,他们的回答被归类为九个与 ChatGPT 在管理教育中的优势相关的不同次主题。同样,当要求教育工作者就在管理教育中使用 ChatGPT 的局限性发表见解时,他们的回答被归纳为访谈中出现的六个次主题。此外,在访谈过程中,教育工作者被问及在管理教育中加强 ChatGPT 的潜在策略时,他们的反馈被归纳为七个次主题,反映了教育工作者建议的各种方法。有必要进行纵向研究,以了解看法和经验如何随着时间的推移而变化。本研究只关注管理教育,可能无法充分反映其他学科教育工作者的经验和观点。该研究有助于确定教育工作者认为 ChatGPT 在管理教育方面的优势和局限性。通过了解教育工作者对 ChatGPT 的看法和使用经验,我们可以深入了解该工具在实际教育环境中的使用情况。这些见解可以指导高等教育机构、政策制定者和 ChatGPT 服务提供商完善和改进 ChatGPT 工具,以更好地满足管理教育工作者的特定需求。原创性/价值在人们对 ChatGPT 的教育应用越来越感兴趣的同时,在探索教育工作者对 ChatGPT 等人工智能工具的看法方面还存在研究空白。虽然有些研究探讨了 ChatGPT 在医学、工程学、法律教育和自然科学等领域的作用,但对管理教育领域的研究仍然不足。本研究关注教育工作者在管理教育变革中使用 ChatGPT 的经验,旨在揭示其优势、局限性以及影响采用的因素。由于该领域的研究有限,教育工作者的见解可以指导高等教育机构、ChatGPT 提供商和政策制定者在印度管理教育中有效实施 ChatGPT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Technology and Smart Education
Interactive Technology and Smart Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Interactive Technology and Smart Education (ITSE) is a multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, which provides a distinct forum to specially promote innovation and participative research approaches. The following terms are defined, as used in the context of this journal: -Interactive Technology refers to all forms of digital technology, as described above, emphasizing innovation and human-/user-centred approaches. -Smart Education "SMART" is used as an acronym that refers to interactive technology that offers a more flexible and tailored approach to meet diverse individual requirements by being “Sensitive, Manageable, Adaptable, Responsive and Timely” to educators’ pedagogical strategies and learners’ educational and social needs’. -Articles are invited that explore innovative use of educational technologies that advance interactive technology in general and its applications in education in particular. The journal aims to bridge gaps in the field by promoting design research, action research, and continuous evaluation as an integral part of the development cycle of usable solutions/systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信