Reformulasi Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu menjadi Lembaga Independen Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pemilu

Mario Agritama S W Madjid
{"title":"Reformulasi Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu menjadi Lembaga Independen Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pemilu","authors":"Mario Agritama S W Madjid","doi":"10.30641/dejure.2024.v24.057-072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of implementing elections in Indonesia from time to time becomes an antinomy of the principle of honesty and fairness. This practice is evidenced by the increasing number of election violations, especially election crimes. This shows that the role of the Sentra Gakkumdu, which specifically functions to eradicate election crimes, has not been effective. The most highlighted issue regarding the existence of the Sentra Gakkumdu is the weak coordination and its limited nature as a forum between Bawaslu, the Police, and the Prosecutor’s Office. This research aims to describe the problematics of election criminal law enforcement in Indonesia and the reformulation of Sentra Gakkumdu into an Independent Institution for Eradicating Election Crimes. This research was conducted using normative juridical research. The results of this study show: First, the ineffectiveness of election criminal enforcement is caused by the limited time for handling cases, the weak institutional building of Gakkumdu which includes institutional nature, authority, human resource capacity and coordination between institutions in it. Second, it is necessary to reformulate the Gakkumdu Center into an Independent Institution for the Eradication of Election Crimes. The idea of making Gakkumdu an Independent Institution departs from several weaknesses in the existing institutional building plus the complexity of handling election crimes and speedy trial design requires a special institution that focuses on handling the eradication of election crimes. The institution will later take the form of an independent institution with prevention and prosecution functions, while. The institutional structure will consist of investigators, investigators, and permanent public prosecutors led by commissioners.","PeriodicalId":473010,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Hukum de Jure","volume":"111 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Hukum de Jure","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2024.v24.057-072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practice of implementing elections in Indonesia from time to time becomes an antinomy of the principle of honesty and fairness. This practice is evidenced by the increasing number of election violations, especially election crimes. This shows that the role of the Sentra Gakkumdu, which specifically functions to eradicate election crimes, has not been effective. The most highlighted issue regarding the existence of the Sentra Gakkumdu is the weak coordination and its limited nature as a forum between Bawaslu, the Police, and the Prosecutor’s Office. This research aims to describe the problematics of election criminal law enforcement in Indonesia and the reformulation of Sentra Gakkumdu into an Independent Institution for Eradicating Election Crimes. This research was conducted using normative juridical research. The results of this study show: First, the ineffectiveness of election criminal enforcement is caused by the limited time for handling cases, the weak institutional building of Gakkumdu which includes institutional nature, authority, human resource capacity and coordination between institutions in it. Second, it is necessary to reformulate the Gakkumdu Center into an Independent Institution for the Eradication of Election Crimes. The idea of making Gakkumdu an Independent Institution departs from several weaknesses in the existing institutional building plus the complexity of handling election crimes and speedy trial design requires a special institution that focuses on handling the eradication of election crimes. The institution will later take the form of an independent institution with prevention and prosecution functions, while. The institutional structure will consist of investigators, investigators, and permanent public prosecutors led by commissioners.
将综合执法中心改组为独立的消除选举犯罪机构
印度尼西亚的选举实践不时与诚实公正的原则背道而驰。违反选举法的行为,尤其是选举犯罪的数量不断增加,就是这种做法的明证。这表明,专门负责根除选举犯罪的 Sentra Gakkumdu 并未发挥有效作用。关于 Sentra Gakkumdu 的存在,最突出的问题是其作为 Bawaslu、警方和检察官办公室之间论坛的协调性和有限性较弱。本研究旨在阐述印尼选举刑事法律执行方面的问题,以及将 Sentra Gakkumdu 改组为根除选举犯罪的独立机构。本研究采用规范法学研究方法进行。研究结果表明第一,选举刑事执法效率低下的原因是办案时间有限,Gakkumdu 的机构建设薄弱,包括机构性质、权限、人力资源能力和机构间的协调。其次,有必要将 Gakkumdu 中心改组为消除选举犯罪的独立机构。将 Gakkumdu 中心改组为独立机构的想法是基于现有机构建设中的几个薄弱环节,再加上处理选举犯罪和快速审判设计的复杂性,需要一个专门的机构来集中处理根除选举犯罪的问题。该机构以后将采取独立机构的形式,具有预防和起诉职能,同时。体制结构将由专员领导的调查员、侦查员和常设检察官组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信