Re‐engagement, quality of life, and burden of treatment in adults on dupilumab for severe atopic dermatitis—A mixed methods study

Q3 Medicine
Emma Porter, C. O’Connor, M. Murphy
{"title":"Re‐engagement, quality of life, and burden of treatment in adults on dupilumab for severe atopic dermatitis—A mixed methods study","authors":"Emma Porter, C. O’Connor, M. Murphy","doi":"10.1002/ski2.372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Targeted biologic therapies have revolutionised the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD).To assess effects of dupilumab on patient re‐engagement, quality of life (QOL), and burden of treatment (BOT) in severe AD.Adults on dupilumab for AD completed questionnaires on QOL, BOT, and provided qualitative reflections, with a subset interviewed to explore experience of leaving and re‐engaging with dermatology. Prior treatments, adverse events, and clinical severity scoring were evaluated. Statements and interviews were qualitatively reviewed.Of 41 patients; median age was 34 years, 68% were male; and 93% (n = 38) had trialled ≥1 immunomodulatory therapies before dupilumab. Median dermatology life quality index was 21 (range 9–30, SD ± 5.1) pre‐dupilumab, and 2 (range 0–11, SD ± 3.4) post‐dupilumab. Median eczema area and severity index was 31.4 (range 10–46.4, SD ± 11.8) pre‐dupilumab, and 6.4 (range 0.4–13.2, SD ± 3.6) on dupilumab. Burden of treatment scores on dupilumab were low (median 0–3/10) across all domains. Themes identified pre‐dupilumab included sleep disturbance, low self‐esteem, social isolation, disempowerment, frustration with ineffective treatments, and high financial costs. Benefits included confidence reacquisition, enhanced sleep, liberation from time‐consuming ‘messy’ topical regimes, improved relationships, and reclaimed autonomy. Side effects included red/itchy eyes (37%, n = 13) and facial dermatitis (20%, n = 7).Twelve patients had deeper interviews. Regarding disengagement with dermatology, themes included ineffectiveness and toxicity of older treatments, attendance futility, dermatologist fatigue, and ‘fizzling out’. Regarding re‐engagement with dermatology, themes included social media influence, novelty, exasperation with QOL, and life‐changing improvements seen with dupilumab.The emergence of novel effective treatments for AD has significant implications for dermatology workforce and financial planning.","PeriodicalId":74804,"journal":{"name":"Skin health and disease","volume":"139 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin health and disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Targeted biologic therapies have revolutionised the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis (AD).To assess effects of dupilumab on patient re‐engagement, quality of life (QOL), and burden of treatment (BOT) in severe AD.Adults on dupilumab for AD completed questionnaires on QOL, BOT, and provided qualitative reflections, with a subset interviewed to explore experience of leaving and re‐engaging with dermatology. Prior treatments, adverse events, and clinical severity scoring were evaluated. Statements and interviews were qualitatively reviewed.Of 41 patients; median age was 34 years, 68% were male; and 93% (n = 38) had trialled ≥1 immunomodulatory therapies before dupilumab. Median dermatology life quality index was 21 (range 9–30, SD ± 5.1) pre‐dupilumab, and 2 (range 0–11, SD ± 3.4) post‐dupilumab. Median eczema area and severity index was 31.4 (range 10–46.4, SD ± 11.8) pre‐dupilumab, and 6.4 (range 0.4–13.2, SD ± 3.6) on dupilumab. Burden of treatment scores on dupilumab were low (median 0–3/10) across all domains. Themes identified pre‐dupilumab included sleep disturbance, low self‐esteem, social isolation, disempowerment, frustration with ineffective treatments, and high financial costs. Benefits included confidence reacquisition, enhanced sleep, liberation from time‐consuming ‘messy’ topical regimes, improved relationships, and reclaimed autonomy. Side effects included red/itchy eyes (37%, n = 13) and facial dermatitis (20%, n = 7).Twelve patients had deeper interviews. Regarding disengagement with dermatology, themes included ineffectiveness and toxicity of older treatments, attendance futility, dermatologist fatigue, and ‘fizzling out’. Regarding re‐engagement with dermatology, themes included social media influence, novelty, exasperation with QOL, and life‐changing improvements seen with dupilumab.The emergence of novel effective treatments for AD has significant implications for dermatology workforce and financial planning.
使用杜匹鲁单抗治疗严重特应性皮炎的成人的再参与、生活质量和治疗负担--一项混合方法研究
目的是评估dupilumab对重症特应性皮炎(AD)患者重新就医、生活质量(QOL)和治疗负担(BOT)的影响。使用dupilumab治疗AD的成年人填写了有关QOL和BOT的问卷,并提供了定性反思,其中一部分人接受了访谈,以了解离开皮肤科和重新就医的经历。对之前的治疗、不良事件和临床严重程度评分进行了评估。在41名患者中,中位年龄为34岁,68%为男性;93%(n=38)的患者在使用dupilumab前曾试用过≥1种免疫调节疗法。杜匹鲁单抗前的皮肤科生活质量指数中位数为21(9-30,SD ± 5.1),杜匹鲁单抗后为2(0-11,SD ± 3.4)。使用杜匹单抗前,湿疹面积和严重程度指数中位数为31.4(范围10-46.4,标度±11.8);使用杜匹单抗后,湿疹面积和严重程度指数中位数为6.4(范围0.4-13.2,标度±3.6)。使用杜比卢单抗后,所有领域的治疗负担得分都很低(中位数为 0-3/10)。使用杜匹鲁单抗前确定的主题包括睡眠障碍、自卑、社交孤立、丧失能力、对无效治疗的沮丧以及高昂的经济成本。疗效包括重拾自信、改善睡眠、摆脱耗时的 "混乱 "局部治疗、改善人际关系以及重新获得自主权。副作用包括眼睛发红/发痒(37%,n=13)和面部皮炎(20%,n=7)。12 名患者接受了更深入的访谈。关于脱离皮肤科治疗的问题,主题包括旧疗法的无效性和毒性、就诊无效、皮肤科医生疲劳以及 "揠苗助长"。关于重新参与皮肤科治疗,主题包括社交媒体的影响、新颖性、对 QOL 的愤懑以及使用 dupilumab 带来的改变生活的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信