Aerial and terrestrial digital images for quantification of powdery mildew severity in Ayocote bean (Phaseolus coccineus)

Alfonso Muñoz-Alcalá, G. Acevedo-Sánchez, Diana Gutiérrez-Esquivel, Oscar Bibiano-Nava, Ivonne García-González, Norma Ávila-Alistac, María José Armenta-Cárdenas, María del Carmen Zúñiga-Romano, Rene Gómez-Mercado, J. J. Coria-Contreras, Serafín Cruz-Izquierdo, Gustavo Mora-Aguilera, José Jesús Márquez-Diego
{"title":"Aerial and terrestrial digital images for quantification of powdery mildew severity in Ayocote bean (Phaseolus coccineus)","authors":"Alfonso Muñoz-Alcalá, G. Acevedo-Sánchez, Diana Gutiérrez-Esquivel, Oscar Bibiano-Nava, Ivonne García-González, Norma Ávila-Alistac, María José Armenta-Cárdenas, María del Carmen Zúñiga-Romano, Rene Gómez-Mercado, J. J. Coria-Contreras, Serafín Cruz-Izquierdo, Gustavo Mora-Aguilera, José Jesús Márquez-Diego","doi":"10.18781/r.mex.fit.2312-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective/Background. Epidemiological research on Phaseolus coccineus is lacking. The aim was to develop and validate digital methods to quantify the severity associated with powdery mildew in ayocote bean. Materials and Methods. An ayocote bean plot with 65.3 % incidence and 22.7 % average powdery mildew foliar severity was selected. Based on 250 leaves collected in field with varying severity degrees, eight 7- and 8-class logarithmic-diagrammatic scales (ELD) were designed and validated in a controlled environment (CEV) and field (FV). In Rstudio®, accuracy (β), precision (R2), reproducibility (r), and agreement level were determined with Cohen’s kappa index (kw) and Lin’s concordance coefficient (LCC). Additionally, a Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) was performed by scale and assessment environment for clustering by similarity evaluation. In ArcMap® v10.3, in a 15-quadrant block, an ‘image segmentation’ analysis was performed using supervised classification and maximum likelihood to estimate powdery mildew severity and an indicator of canopy coverage index (VCI). Results. In VEC-1, v1r2 (ELD-7c; β=1.07, R2=0.93, r=0.87) and v1r1 (ELD-8c; β=0.97, R2=0.85, r=0.87) scales were best evaluated. In VEC-2, comparing clusters conformed in the HCA, the ELD-7c was the best scored with perfect accuracy (β>0.96), very high precision (R2>0.94), very high reproducibility (r=0.97-0.99) and very high agreement (κw>0.96; LCC>0.97); and in ELD-8c reproducibility and agreement decreased. In VCa, ELD-7c maintained optimal metrics, but ELD-8c reached ideal parameters for preventive ELD in early stages of powdery mildew (β>0.98, R2>0.98, r=0.99, κw=0.99-0.999, LCC=0.98-0.999). Image analysis estimated severity = 8.4 % (CI = 5.3 - 12.6 %) and ICV = 0.88 (CI = 0.76 - 0.99), contrasting with field assessment 47% (CI = 38.8 - 55.3%) and 0.46 (CI = 0.76 - 0.99), respectively, mainly with ICV > 0.94 due to less symptomatic leaf exposure. Suggests applicability for canopy estimation with restrictions for severity based on pathogen expression. Conclusion. A methodology for ELD development is proposed, comprising: image acquisition, processing and quantification; controlled validation and field validation. Validation statistics included precision (R2); accuracy (β); reproducibility (Pearson’s coefficient and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis); and agreement (Lin’s Coefficient and Kappa Index), proposed in a comprehensive approach for first time. RGB-drone images are proposed to estimate a comprehensive vigor and severity coverage index.","PeriodicalId":360578,"journal":{"name":"Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, Mexican Journal of Phytopathology","volume":" 86","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología, Mexican Journal of Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18781/r.mex.fit.2312-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective/Background. Epidemiological research on Phaseolus coccineus is lacking. The aim was to develop and validate digital methods to quantify the severity associated with powdery mildew in ayocote bean. Materials and Methods. An ayocote bean plot with 65.3 % incidence and 22.7 % average powdery mildew foliar severity was selected. Based on 250 leaves collected in field with varying severity degrees, eight 7- and 8-class logarithmic-diagrammatic scales (ELD) were designed and validated in a controlled environment (CEV) and field (FV). In Rstudio®, accuracy (β), precision (R2), reproducibility (r), and agreement level were determined with Cohen’s kappa index (kw) and Lin’s concordance coefficient (LCC). Additionally, a Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) was performed by scale and assessment environment for clustering by similarity evaluation. In ArcMap® v10.3, in a 15-quadrant block, an ‘image segmentation’ analysis was performed using supervised classification and maximum likelihood to estimate powdery mildew severity and an indicator of canopy coverage index (VCI). Results. In VEC-1, v1r2 (ELD-7c; β=1.07, R2=0.93, r=0.87) and v1r1 (ELD-8c; β=0.97, R2=0.85, r=0.87) scales were best evaluated. In VEC-2, comparing clusters conformed in the HCA, the ELD-7c was the best scored with perfect accuracy (β>0.96), very high precision (R2>0.94), very high reproducibility (r=0.97-0.99) and very high agreement (κw>0.96; LCC>0.97); and in ELD-8c reproducibility and agreement decreased. In VCa, ELD-7c maintained optimal metrics, but ELD-8c reached ideal parameters for preventive ELD in early stages of powdery mildew (β>0.98, R2>0.98, r=0.99, κw=0.99-0.999, LCC=0.98-0.999). Image analysis estimated severity = 8.4 % (CI = 5.3 - 12.6 %) and ICV = 0.88 (CI = 0.76 - 0.99), contrasting with field assessment 47% (CI = 38.8 - 55.3%) and 0.46 (CI = 0.76 - 0.99), respectively, mainly with ICV > 0.94 due to less symptomatic leaf exposure. Suggests applicability for canopy estimation with restrictions for severity based on pathogen expression. Conclusion. A methodology for ELD development is proposed, comprising: image acquisition, processing and quantification; controlled validation and field validation. Validation statistics included precision (R2); accuracy (β); reproducibility (Pearson’s coefficient and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis); and agreement (Lin’s Coefficient and Kappa Index), proposed in a comprehensive approach for first time. RGB-drone images are proposed to estimate a comprehensive vigor and severity coverage index.
用于量化 Ayocote 豆(Phaseolus coccineus)白粉病严重程度的航空和地面数字图像
目的/背景。目前还缺乏对椰菜白粉病的流行病学研究。本研究旨在开发和验证数字化方法,以量化椰菜白粉病的严重程度。材料和方法。选择了一块白粉病发病率为 65.3%、平均叶片白粉病严重程度为 22.7%的菜豆地。根据在田间采集的 250 片不同严重程度的叶片,设计了 8 个 7 级和 8 级对数图解量表(ELD),并在受控环境(CEV)和田间(FV)中进行了验证。在 Rstudio® 中,使用科恩卡帕指数(kw)和林氏一致系数(LCC)确定了准确度(β)、精确度(R2)、重现性(r)和一致程度。此外,还按照量表和评估环境进行了层次聚类分析(HCA),通过相似性评价进行聚类。在 ArcMap® v10.3 中,利用监督分类和最大似然法对 15 个象限区块进行了 "图像分割 "分析,以估计白粉病严重程度和冠层覆盖指数(VCI)指标。结果在 VEC-1 中,v1r2(ELD-7c;β=1.07,R2=0.93,r=0.87)和 v1r1(ELD-8c;β=0.97,R2=0.85,r=0.87)尺度的评估结果最佳。在 VEC-2 中,比较 HCA 中符合的群组,ELD-7c 的得分最高,具有完美的准确性(β>0.96)、极高的精确性(R2>0.94)、极高的再现性(r=0.97-0.99)和极高的一致性(κw>0.96;LCC>0.97);而 ELD-8c 的再现性和一致性有所下降。在 VCa 中,ELD-7c 保持了最佳指标,但 ELD-8c 达到了白粉病早期阶段预防性 ELD 的理想参数(β>0.98,R2>0.98,r=0.99,κw=0.99-0.999,LCC=0.98-0.999)。图像分析估计的严重程度 = 8.4 %(CI = 5.3 - 12.6 %)和 ICV = 0.88(CI = 0.76 - 0.99),分别与实地评估的 47 %(CI = 38.8 - 55.3 %)和 0.46(CI = 0.76 - 0.99)形成对比,主要是由于症状叶暴露较少,ICV > 0.94。根据病原体的表现形式对严重程度进行限制,建议适用于树冠估计。结论提出了一种开发 ELD 的方法,包括:图像采集、处理和量化;对照验证和实地验证。验证统计包括精确度(R2)、准确度(β)、再现性(皮尔逊系数和层次聚类分析)和一致性(林氏系数和卡帕指数),首次以综合方法提出。建议使用 RGB 无人机图像估算综合活力和严重程度覆盖指数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信