Optometry student clinical practice at public health facilities: A systematic review

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Raserogole F. Segooa, V. Moodley
{"title":"Optometry student clinical practice at public health facilities: A systematic review","authors":"Raserogole F. Segooa, V. Moodley","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical training, supervision and practice are the most important aspects of health profession education, including optometry. Institutions implore various methods for students to gain access, exposure and experience in different clinical environments, away from their normal academic settings.Aim: This review aimed to investigate studies and related documentary evidence to determine existing standards and methods for educational institutions in conducting optometry clinical training at the external sites.Setting: The electronic databases – ProQuest One, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Sabinet, Science Direct and Google Scholar – were searched systematically for studies on the implementation of workplace clinical training of undergraduate optometry students.Methods: The study followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) systematic review methodology and a systematic search of various electronic databases was conducted for studies on implementation of workplace clinical training. Of the 450 full-text studies searched, 13 studies were found to be reputable sources of evidence and were included in this systematic review.Results: Four themes relating to student clinical training emerged, namely, clinical training approaches implemented, expected minimum standards at the training sites, clinical training environment wherein students and supervisors find themselves and clinical competence of the supervisors and students. They encompass important factors to consider in the planning and provision of quality, efficient and effective student clinical supervision at the external training facilities.Conclusion: There is a dearth of scholarly studies to guide clinical training of optometry training within the public health sector. However, more studies are undertaken in other health disciplines, and they provide generic guidelines, which can be adapted for optometry.Contribution: The article highlights the need for further studies in optometry student clinical training, focussing on programme designs and standardisation of clinical training in multi-institutional, low-income contexts.","PeriodicalId":45721,"journal":{"name":"Health SA Gesondheid","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health SA Gesondheid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical training, supervision and practice are the most important aspects of health profession education, including optometry. Institutions implore various methods for students to gain access, exposure and experience in different clinical environments, away from their normal academic settings.Aim: This review aimed to investigate studies and related documentary evidence to determine existing standards and methods for educational institutions in conducting optometry clinical training at the external sites.Setting: The electronic databases – ProQuest One, Scopus, EBSCOhost, Sabinet, Science Direct and Google Scholar – were searched systematically for studies on the implementation of workplace clinical training of undergraduate optometry students.Methods: The study followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) systematic review methodology and a systematic search of various electronic databases was conducted for studies on implementation of workplace clinical training. Of the 450 full-text studies searched, 13 studies were found to be reputable sources of evidence and were included in this systematic review.Results: Four themes relating to student clinical training emerged, namely, clinical training approaches implemented, expected minimum standards at the training sites, clinical training environment wherein students and supervisors find themselves and clinical competence of the supervisors and students. They encompass important factors to consider in the planning and provision of quality, efficient and effective student clinical supervision at the external training facilities.Conclusion: There is a dearth of scholarly studies to guide clinical training of optometry training within the public health sector. However, more studies are undertaken in other health disciplines, and they provide generic guidelines, which can be adapted for optometry.Contribution: The article highlights the need for further studies in optometry student clinical training, focussing on programme designs and standardisation of clinical training in multi-institutional, low-income contexts.
公共卫生机构的验光学生临床实践:系统回顾
背景:临床培训、监督和实践是包括眼视光学在内的健康专业教育的最重要方面。目的:本综述旨在调查研究和相关文献证据,以确定教育机构在校外地点开展验光临床培训的现有标准和方法:在 ProQuest One、Scopus、EBSCOhost、Sabinet、Science Direct 和 Google Scholar 等电子数据库中系统地搜索了有关对视光本科生实施工作场所临床培训的研究:本研究采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)的系统综述方法,在各种电子数据库中系统检索了有关实施工作场所临床培训的研究。在搜索到的 450 篇全文研究中,有 13 篇研究被认为是可靠的证据来源,并被纳入本系统综述:结果:与学生临床培训相关的四个主题分别是:实施的临床培训方法、培训地点的预期最低标准、学生和督导员所处的临床培训环境以及督导员和学生的临床能力。它们包含了在校外培训机构规划和提供优质、高效和有效的学生临床督导时需要考虑的重要因素:在公共卫生领域,指导验光配镜临床培训的学术研究十分匮乏。然而,在其他卫生学科中开展的研究较多,这些研究提供了通用指南,可适用于视光学:文章强调了进一步研究验光学生临床培训的必要性,重点关注多机构、低收入背景下的临床培训课程设计和标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health SA Gesondheid
Health SA Gesondheid HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信