Power and solidarity in pronominal forms of address: A case study of Chinese and Russian teacher-student interactions

Q1 Social Sciences
Qing Zhou, T. Larina
{"title":"Power and solidarity in pronominal forms of address: A case study of Chinese and Russian teacher-student interactions","authors":"Qing Zhou, T. Larina","doi":"10.22363/2521-442x-2024-8-1-87-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the evolving landscape of global education, understanding the intricacies of interpersonal dynamics in academic settings across different linguacultures is paramount for building effective multicultural teaching environments. This study investigates the usage of T/V pronominal forms of address within teacher-student interactions in Chinese and Russian academic contexts. It aims to reveal similarities and differences in the usage of pronominal forms of address in the two linguacultural contexts and unveil the impact of sociocultural factors, namely power and solidarity, on their choice. The data were obtained from a parallel questionnaire survey with the participation of 360 students (260 Chinese mainland students and 100 Russian students) and an interview with 30 students from each country. Employing a comprehensive dual-methodology approach, this study combines quantitative analyses of T/V forms of address frequencies with qualitative insights on their pragmatics, appropriateness, and students’ preferences from interviews. The findings revealed distinct T/V form usage strategies in Chinese and Russian academic discourse. They showed that Chinese teachers predominantly use the T form for students, while students use both V and T forms for teachers. Conversely, Russian settings show a prevalence of the reciprocal V form in teacher-student interactions, with some limited usage of the T form by teachers with students. The results underscore the significance of hierarchical relationships, the demonstration of power distance, and, at the same time, solidarity in the Chinese context, while Russian students and teachers emphasise reciprocal formality in relationships and maintain boundaries. We suggest that different types of interaction between teachers and students in two cultural contexts are due to differences in the sociocultural organisation of society and cultural values. The study provides insights for educators and researchers navigating linguistic and cultural diversity in academic contexts and contributes to effective interaction in a multicultural educational environment.","PeriodicalId":36167,"journal":{"name":"Training, Language and Culture","volume":" 27","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Training, Language and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2521-442x-2024-8-1-87-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the evolving landscape of global education, understanding the intricacies of interpersonal dynamics in academic settings across different linguacultures is paramount for building effective multicultural teaching environments. This study investigates the usage of T/V pronominal forms of address within teacher-student interactions in Chinese and Russian academic contexts. It aims to reveal similarities and differences in the usage of pronominal forms of address in the two linguacultural contexts and unveil the impact of sociocultural factors, namely power and solidarity, on their choice. The data were obtained from a parallel questionnaire survey with the participation of 360 students (260 Chinese mainland students and 100 Russian students) and an interview with 30 students from each country. Employing a comprehensive dual-methodology approach, this study combines quantitative analyses of T/V forms of address frequencies with qualitative insights on their pragmatics, appropriateness, and students’ preferences from interviews. The findings revealed distinct T/V form usage strategies in Chinese and Russian academic discourse. They showed that Chinese teachers predominantly use the T form for students, while students use both V and T forms for teachers. Conversely, Russian settings show a prevalence of the reciprocal V form in teacher-student interactions, with some limited usage of the T form by teachers with students. The results underscore the significance of hierarchical relationships, the demonstration of power distance, and, at the same time, solidarity in the Chinese context, while Russian students and teachers emphasise reciprocal formality in relationships and maintain boundaries. We suggest that different types of interaction between teachers and students in two cultural contexts are due to differences in the sociocultural organisation of society and cultural values. The study provides insights for educators and researchers navigating linguistic and cultural diversity in academic contexts and contributes to effective interaction in a multicultural educational environment.
代词式称呼中的权力与团结:中俄师生互动案例研究
在全球教育不断发展的背景下,了解不同语言文化背景下学术环境中人际动态的复杂性,对于建立有效的多元文化教学环境至关重要。本研究调查了汉语和俄语学术语境中师生互动中T/V代词形式的使用情况。研究旨在揭示在两种语言文化背景下使用代词形式的异同,并揭示社会文化因素(即权力和团结)对代词形式选择的影响。数据来自 360 名学生(260 名中国大陆学生和 100 名俄罗斯学生)参与的平行问卷调查,以及对两国各 30 名学生的访谈。本研究采用了综合的双重方法论,既有对 T/V 称呼形式频率的定量分析,也有通过访谈对其语用学、恰当性和学生偏好的定性分析。研究结果揭示了中俄学术话语中不同的 T/V 形式使用策略。他们发现,中国教师对学生主要使用 "T "形式,而学生对教师则同时使用 "V "和 "T "形式。相反,在俄语环境中,师生互动普遍使用互惠的 V 形式,教师对学生使用 T 形式的情况有限。研究结果强调了在中国环境中等级关系的重要性、权力距离的展示,同时也强调了团结,而俄罗斯师生则强调关系中的互惠形式并保持界限。我们认为,两种文化背景下师生互动的不同类型是由社会文化组织和文化价值观的差异造成的。这项研究为教育工作者和研究人员在学术环境中驾驭语言和文化多样性提供了启示,有助于在多元文化教育环境中实现有效互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Training, Language and Culture
Training, Language and Culture Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信