Culture of photosynthetic microalgae consortium in artificial produced water supplemented with liquid digestate in closed column photobioreactors and open-pond raceway
Aurélien Parsy , Elena Ficara , Valeria Mezzanotte , Marco Mantovani , Rémy Guyoneaud , Florian Monlau , Cecilia Sambusiti
{"title":"Culture of photosynthetic microalgae consortium in artificial produced water supplemented with liquid digestate in closed column photobioreactors and open-pond raceway","authors":"Aurélien Parsy , Elena Ficara , Valeria Mezzanotte , Marco Mantovani , Rémy Guyoneaud , Florian Monlau , Cecilia Sambusiti","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2024.107165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Large amounts of produced water are extracted by the Oil and Gas energy sector since the industrial revolution. This available water, often salty, can be used to dilute liquid digestate from the anaerobic digestion process, a promising source of nutrients for microalgae cultivation. The study investigates the growth of halotolerant microalgae and their associated bacteria in column photobioreactors (PBRs) and open raceway pond (RWP), to treat industrial wastewaters while producing biomass for energy valorisation. Microalgae were cultured in mixtures of saline artificial produced water (7–44 %v/v), liquid digestate (5 %v/v using PBRs, 29–63 %v/v using RWP) and seawater. <em>Nannochloropsis oceanica</em> and <em>Tetraselmis suecica</em> strains were firstly cultivated in 70 L PBRs in indoor conditions for 3 months and later in 1.1 m<sup>3</sup> RWP operated in outdoor conditions for 5 months in spring-summer period. In PBRs, average productivity was 9.0 ± 4.2 gVSS·m<sup>−2</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> (102–153 mgVSS·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>), with daily removal efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand, nitrogen and phosphorous up to 61.8, 31.6 and 97.2 %, respectively. In RWP, strong changes in the microalgae populations were observed. Productivity was 6.7 ± 5.2 gVSS·m<sup>−2</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup> (30 ± 23 mgVSS·L<sup>−1</sup>·d<sup>−1</sup>), with daily removal efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand, nitrogen and phosphorous up to 48.4, 44.4 and 88.1 %, respectively. In parallel with the production of microalgae, a nitrifying microbial population grew in the RWP despite the high salinity (70 g L<sup>−1</sup>). Over these periods of several months, microalgae production was maintained using a culture medium containing high salt concentration, metals and harmful aromatic compounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953424001181","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Large amounts of produced water are extracted by the Oil and Gas energy sector since the industrial revolution. This available water, often salty, can be used to dilute liquid digestate from the anaerobic digestion process, a promising source of nutrients for microalgae cultivation. The study investigates the growth of halotolerant microalgae and their associated bacteria in column photobioreactors (PBRs) and open raceway pond (RWP), to treat industrial wastewaters while producing biomass for energy valorisation. Microalgae were cultured in mixtures of saline artificial produced water (7–44 %v/v), liquid digestate (5 %v/v using PBRs, 29–63 %v/v using RWP) and seawater. Nannochloropsis oceanica and Tetraselmis suecica strains were firstly cultivated in 70 L PBRs in indoor conditions for 3 months and later in 1.1 m3 RWP operated in outdoor conditions for 5 months in spring-summer period. In PBRs, average productivity was 9.0 ± 4.2 gVSS·m−2·d−1 (102–153 mgVSS·L−1·d−1), with daily removal efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand, nitrogen and phosphorous up to 61.8, 31.6 and 97.2 %, respectively. In RWP, strong changes in the microalgae populations were observed. Productivity was 6.7 ± 5.2 gVSS·m−2·d−1 (30 ± 23 mgVSS·L−1·d−1), with daily removal efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand, nitrogen and phosphorous up to 48.4, 44.4 and 88.1 %, respectively. In parallel with the production of microalgae, a nitrifying microbial population grew in the RWP despite the high salinity (70 g L−1). Over these periods of several months, microalgae production was maintained using a culture medium containing high salt concentration, metals and harmful aromatic compounds.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.