Assessing visitor perceptions of recreation benefits from nearby public lands

IF 3.6 3区 管理学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Catherine A. Hughes, Travis B. Paveglio
{"title":"Assessing visitor perceptions of recreation benefits from nearby public lands","authors":"Catherine A. Hughes,&nbsp;Travis B. Paveglio","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2024.100735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shifting national priorities and social values for public lands recreation require proactive management decisions that respond to diverse visitor needs. Emerging policy and practice also indicate a need to better understand how local communities benefit from recreation trends on public lands, including whether visitors engage with community services as part of their recreation experience. The research presented here utilized an intercept survey of recreationists on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands in southeastern Idaho to explore how recreation benefits relate to intended future visits. We also focus on the importance of desired community benefits resulting from recreation on nearby public lands, which are noted as understudied components in recreation literature. Results indicate that higher levels of desired personal, community, economic, and environmental benefits correlate with greater likelihood of returning to the study area, though only community benefits remained significant when controlling for all benefit categories. We also found significant interactions between recreationists' desired community benefits and desired environmental benefits, and between desired personal benefits and desired economic benefits. Desirability of four recreation benefit categories differed significantly among visitors to the two adjacent BLM planning units sampled as part of the research. In sum, our results suggest that desired community benefits may influence distinct, yet important components of recreationists' overall experiences. We suggest a need for in-depth assessments of local and nonlocal recreationists' desires for area community benefits, as these benefits may significantly influence other aspects of visitor needs, including intentions to return to public lands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100735"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shifting national priorities and social values for public lands recreation require proactive management decisions that respond to diverse visitor needs. Emerging policy and practice also indicate a need to better understand how local communities benefit from recreation trends on public lands, including whether visitors engage with community services as part of their recreation experience. The research presented here utilized an intercept survey of recreationists on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands in southeastern Idaho to explore how recreation benefits relate to intended future visits. We also focus on the importance of desired community benefits resulting from recreation on nearby public lands, which are noted as understudied components in recreation literature. Results indicate that higher levels of desired personal, community, economic, and environmental benefits correlate with greater likelihood of returning to the study area, though only community benefits remained significant when controlling for all benefit categories. We also found significant interactions between recreationists' desired community benefits and desired environmental benefits, and between desired personal benefits and desired economic benefits. Desirability of four recreation benefit categories differed significantly among visitors to the two adjacent BLM planning units sampled as part of the research. In sum, our results suggest that desired community benefits may influence distinct, yet important components of recreationists' overall experiences. We suggest a need for in-depth assessments of local and nonlocal recreationists' desires for area community benefits, as these benefits may significantly influence other aspects of visitor needs, including intentions to return to public lands.

评估游客对附近公共土地带来的娱乐效益的看法
公共土地娱乐的国家优先事项和社会价值不断变化,这就要求做出积极的管理决策,以满足游客的不同需求。新的政策和实践也表明,需要更好地了解当地社区如何从公共土地上的娱乐趋势中获益,包括游客是否将社区服务作为其娱乐体验的一部分。本文介绍的研究利用对爱达荷州东南部土地管理局(BLM)土地上的娱乐者进行的拦截调查,探讨娱乐利益与未来预期访问的关系。我们还重点关注了在附近公共土地上休闲娱乐所带来的理想社区利益的重要性,这些利益在休闲娱乐文献中被认为是研究不足的组成部分。结果表明,期望的个人、社区、经济和环境效益水平越高,返回研究地区的可能性就越大,尽管在对所有效益类别进行控制后,只有社区效益仍然显著。我们还发现,休闲者期望的社区效益与期望的环境效益之间,以及期望的个人效益与期望的经济效益之间存在着明显的相互作用。在作为研究一部分的两个相邻的 BLM 规划单位中,游客对四个娱乐效益类别的期望值差异很大。总之,我们的研究结果表明,所期望的社区利益可能会影响休闲者整体体验中不同但重要的组成部分。我们建议有必要深入评估本地和非本地休闲者对地区社区福利的需求,因为这些福利可能会极大地影响游客需求的其他方面,包括重返公共土地的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信