{"title":"Assessing visitor perceptions of recreation benefits from nearby public lands","authors":"Catherine A. Hughes, Travis B. Paveglio","doi":"10.1016/j.jort.2024.100735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shifting national priorities and social values for public lands recreation require proactive management decisions that respond to diverse visitor needs. Emerging policy and practice also indicate a need to better understand how local communities benefit from recreation trends on public lands, including whether visitors engage with community services as part of their recreation experience. The research presented here utilized an intercept survey of recreationists on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands in southeastern Idaho to explore how recreation benefits relate to intended future visits. We also focus on the importance of desired community benefits resulting from recreation on nearby public lands, which are noted as understudied components in recreation literature. Results indicate that higher levels of desired personal, community, economic, and environmental benefits correlate with greater likelihood of returning to the study area, though only community benefits remained significant when controlling for all benefit categories. We also found significant interactions between recreationists' desired community benefits and desired environmental benefits, and between desired personal benefits and desired economic benefits. Desirability of four recreation benefit categories differed significantly among visitors to the two adjacent BLM planning units sampled as part of the research. In sum, our results suggest that desired community benefits may influence distinct, yet important components of recreationists' overall experiences. We suggest a need for in-depth assessments of local and nonlocal recreationists' desires for area community benefits, as these benefits may significantly influence other aspects of visitor needs, including intentions to return to public lands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","volume":"46 ","pages":"Article 100735"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism-Research Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213078024000033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Shifting national priorities and social values for public lands recreation require proactive management decisions that respond to diverse visitor needs. Emerging policy and practice also indicate a need to better understand how local communities benefit from recreation trends on public lands, including whether visitors engage with community services as part of their recreation experience. The research presented here utilized an intercept survey of recreationists on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands in southeastern Idaho to explore how recreation benefits relate to intended future visits. We also focus on the importance of desired community benefits resulting from recreation on nearby public lands, which are noted as understudied components in recreation literature. Results indicate that higher levels of desired personal, community, economic, and environmental benefits correlate with greater likelihood of returning to the study area, though only community benefits remained significant when controlling for all benefit categories. We also found significant interactions between recreationists' desired community benefits and desired environmental benefits, and between desired personal benefits and desired economic benefits. Desirability of four recreation benefit categories differed significantly among visitors to the two adjacent BLM planning units sampled as part of the research. In sum, our results suggest that desired community benefits may influence distinct, yet important components of recreationists' overall experiences. We suggest a need for in-depth assessments of local and nonlocal recreationists' desires for area community benefits, as these benefits may significantly influence other aspects of visitor needs, including intentions to return to public lands.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism offers a dedicated outlet for research relevant to social sciences and natural resources. The journal publishes peer reviewed original research on all aspects of outdoor recreation planning and management, covering the entire spectrum of settings from wilderness to urban outdoor recreation opportunities. It also focuses on new products and findings in nature based tourism and park management. JORT is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary journal, articles may focus on any aspect of theory, method, or concept of outdoor recreation research, planning or management, and interdisciplinary work is especially welcome, and may be of a theoretical and/or a case study nature. Depending on the topic of investigation, articles may be positioned within one academic discipline, or draw from several disciplines in an integrative manner, with overarching relevance to social sciences and natural resources. JORT is international in scope and attracts scholars from all reaches of the world to facilitate the exchange of ideas. As such, the journal enhances understanding of scientific knowledge, empirical results, and practitioners'' needs. Therefore in JORT each article is accompanied by an executive summary, written by the editors or authors, highlighting the planning and management relevant aspects of the article.