Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Esophagectomy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Myung Hun Lee, Moo In Park, Ju Won Lee, Kyoungwon Jung, Jae Hyun Kim, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park
{"title":"Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Esophagectomy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Myung Hun Lee, Moo In Park, Ju Won Lee, Kyoungwon Jung, Jae Hyun Kim, Sung Eun Kim, Won Moon, Seun Ja Park","doi":"10.4166/kjg.2023.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>The efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is unclear. This study compared the survival and recurrence of patients with locally advanced ESCC after definitive CCRT and surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent CCRT or esophagectomy at Kosin University Gospel Hospital from January 2010 to December 2016. The patients' baseline characteristics, pathology, recurrence rate, and three-year/five-year overall survival were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study evaluated ESCC patients with cT1-T2, N+ or cT3-T4, or N, who were treated by definitive CCRT (n=14) or esophagectomy (n=32). No significant difference was noted between the two groups, except for the location of the cancer and performance state. The respective three- and five-year overall survival rates were 30.8% and 23.1% in the CCRT group and 40.2% and 22.5% in the esophagectomy group (p=0.685). In the CCRT group, three patients (21.4%) had a complete response, and two (66.7%) had a recurrence. In the esophagectomy group, an R0 resection was achieved in 28 (87.5%) patients, and a recurrence occurred in 18 (64.3%). The median disease-free survival in the CCRT and esophagectomy groups was 14 and 17 months, respectively (p=0.882).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results showed no significant difference in survival between the definitive CCRT and surgery as the initial treatment. Nevertheless, larger prospective studies will be needed because of the retrospective nature and small number of patients in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":94245,"journal":{"name":"The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi","volume":"83 3","pages":"102-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2023.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: The efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is unclear. This study compared the survival and recurrence of patients with locally advanced ESCC after definitive CCRT and surgery.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent CCRT or esophagectomy at Kosin University Gospel Hospital from January 2010 to December 2016. The patients' baseline characteristics, pathology, recurrence rate, and three-year/five-year overall survival were obtained.

Results: This study evaluated ESCC patients with cT1-T2, N+ or cT3-T4, or N, who were treated by definitive CCRT (n=14) or esophagectomy (n=32). No significant difference was noted between the two groups, except for the location of the cancer and performance state. The respective three- and five-year overall survival rates were 30.8% and 23.1% in the CCRT group and 40.2% and 22.5% in the esophagectomy group (p=0.685). In the CCRT group, three patients (21.4%) had a complete response, and two (66.7%) had a recurrence. In the esophagectomy group, an R0 resection was achieved in 28 (87.5%) patients, and a recurrence occurred in 18 (64.3%). The median disease-free survival in the CCRT and esophagectomy groups was 14 and 17 months, respectively (p=0.882).

Conclusions: These results showed no significant difference in survival between the definitive CCRT and surgery as the initial treatment. Nevertheless, larger prospective studies will be needed because of the retrospective nature and small number of patients in this study.

局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者食管切除术与同期化放疗的临床疗效比较
背景/目的:局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的同期化放疗(CCRT)或食管切除术的疗效尚不明确。本研究比较了局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者明确接受 CCRT 和手术治疗后的生存率和复发率:2010年1月至2016年12月,科信大学福音医院对接受CCRT或食管切除术的局部晚期ESCC患者进行了回顾性研究。研究获得了患者的基线特征、病理、复发率和三年/五年总生存率:本研究评估了cT1-T2、N+或cT3-T4或N的ESCC患者,这些患者接受了CCRT(14人)或食管切除术(32人)的明确治疗。除癌症位置和表现状态外,两组患者无明显差异。CCRT组的三年和五年总生存率分别为30.8%和23.1%,食管切除组分别为40.2%和22.5%(P=0.685)。在CCRT组中,3名患者(21.4%)获得完全应答,2名患者(66.7%)复发。在食管切除术组中,28 名患者(87.5%)实现了 R0 切除,18 名患者(64.3%)复发。CCRT组和食管切除组的中位无病生存期分别为14个月和17个月(P=0.882):这些结果表明,作为初始治疗方法的CCRT和手术在生存期方面没有明显差异。尽管如此,由于本研究具有回顾性且患者人数较少,因此需要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信