Determinants of confrontation naming deficits on the Boston Naming Test associated with transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 pathology.

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Carling G Robinson, Austin W Goodrich, Stephen D Weigand, Nha Trang Thu Pham, Arenn F Carlos, Marina Buciuc, Melissa E Murray, Aivi T Nguyen, R Ross Reichard, David S Knopman, Ronald C Petersen, Dennis W Dickson, Rene L Utianski, Jennifer L Whitwell, Keith A Josephs, Mary M Machulda
{"title":"Determinants of confrontation naming deficits on the Boston Naming Test associated with transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 pathology.","authors":"Carling G Robinson, Austin W Goodrich, Stephen D Weigand, Nha Trang Thu Pham, Arenn F Carlos, Marina Buciuc, Melissa E Murray, Aivi T Nguyen, R Ross Reichard, David S Knopman, Ronald C Petersen, Dennis W Dickson, Rene L Utianski, Jennifer L Whitwell, Keith A Josephs, Mary M Machulda","doi":"10.1017/S1355617724000146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether poorer performance on the Boston Naming Test (BNT) in individuals with transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 pathology (TDP-43+) is due to greater loss of word knowledge compared to retrieval-based deficits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective clinical-pathologic study of 282 participants with Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic changes (ADNC) and known TDP-43 status. We evaluated item-level performance on the 60-item BNT for first and last available assessment. We fit cross-sectional negative binomial count models that assessed total number of incorrect items, number correct of responses with phonemic cue (reflecting retrieval difficulties), and number of \"I don't know\" (IDK) responses (suggestive of loss of word knowledge) at both assessments. Models included TDP-43 status and adjusted for sex, age, education, years from test to death, and ADNC severity. Models that evaluated the last assessment adjusted for number of prior BNT exposures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>43% were TDP-43+. The TDP-43+ group had worse performance on BNT total score at first (<i>p</i> = .01) and last assessments (<i>p</i> = .01). At first assessment, TDP-43+ individuals had an estimated 29% (CI: 7%-56%) higher mean number of incorrect items after adjusting for covariates, and a 51% (CI: 15%-98%) higher number of IDK responses compared to TDP-43-. At last assessment, compared to TDP-43-, the TDP-43+ group on average missed 31% (CI: 6%-62%; <i>p</i> = .01) more items and had 33% more IDK responses (CI: 1% fewer to 78% more; <i>p</i> = .06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An important component of poorer performance on the BNT in participants who are TDP-43+ is having loss of word knowledge versus retrieval difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":" ","pages":"575-583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11422518/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617724000146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether poorer performance on the Boston Naming Test (BNT) in individuals with transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 pathology (TDP-43+) is due to greater loss of word knowledge compared to retrieval-based deficits.

Methods: Retrospective clinical-pathologic study of 282 participants with Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic changes (ADNC) and known TDP-43 status. We evaluated item-level performance on the 60-item BNT for first and last available assessment. We fit cross-sectional negative binomial count models that assessed total number of incorrect items, number correct of responses with phonemic cue (reflecting retrieval difficulties), and number of "I don't know" (IDK) responses (suggestive of loss of word knowledge) at both assessments. Models included TDP-43 status and adjusted for sex, age, education, years from test to death, and ADNC severity. Models that evaluated the last assessment adjusted for number of prior BNT exposures.

Results: 43% were TDP-43+. The TDP-43+ group had worse performance on BNT total score at first (p = .01) and last assessments (p = .01). At first assessment, TDP-43+ individuals had an estimated 29% (CI: 7%-56%) higher mean number of incorrect items after adjusting for covariates, and a 51% (CI: 15%-98%) higher number of IDK responses compared to TDP-43-. At last assessment, compared to TDP-43-, the TDP-43+ group on average missed 31% (CI: 6%-62%; p = .01) more items and had 33% more IDK responses (CI: 1% fewer to 78% more; p = .06).

Conclusions: An important component of poorer performance on the BNT in participants who are TDP-43+ is having loss of word knowledge versus retrieval difficulties.

与转录反应 DNA 结合蛋白 43 病变有关的波士顿命名测试中对抗命名缺陷的决定因素。
目的目的:确定在波士顿命名测试(BNT)中,反式反应DNA结合蛋白43病变(TDP-43+)患者的表现较差是否是由于单词知识丧失较多,而非基于检索的缺陷:方法:对282名阿尔茨海默病神经病理学改变(ADNC)和已知TDP-43状态的参与者进行回顾性临床病理学研究。我们评估了 60 个项目的 BNT 在第一次和最后一次评估中的项目水平表现。我们拟合了横断面负二项计数模型,评估了两次评估中错误项目的总数、带有音位线索的正确回答数(反映检索困难)以及 "我不知道"(IDK)回答数(表明单词知识丧失)。模型包括 TDP-43 状态,并对性别、年龄、教育程度、从测试到死亡的年数以及 ADNC 严重程度进行了调整。评估最后一次评估的模型对之前接触 BNT 的次数进行了调整:43%为TDP-43+。TDP-43+ 组在首次评估(p = .01)和最后一次评估(p = .01)中的 BNT 总分表现较差。与 TDP-43+ 组相比,在首次评估时,经协变因素调整后,TDP-43+ 组的错误项目平均数量估计高出 29% (CI:7%-56%),IDK 反应数量高出 51% (CI:15%-98%)。在最后一次评估中,与 TDP-43- 组相比,TDP-43+ 组错过的项目平均多 31% (CI:6%-62%;p = .01),IDK 反应多 33%(CI:少 1%-多 78%;p = .06):结论:TDP-43+ 参与者在 BNT 中表现较差的一个重要原因是单词知识的丧失和检索困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信